NYU Wordpress Theme

NYU Prague Hosts Leading Intellectuals at Forum 2000 Conference

Forum 2000
What role does education play in the spread of democracy? This question – especially relevant to NYU in recent years as the global network expands – was the main issue at the 19th Forum 2000 Conference in Prague, which brought together over 150 politicians, activists, diplomats, artists and student leaders from around the world to debate the topic at over 50 panel discussions. NYU Prague faculty played an active role in the organization of the annual event, hosting a panel exploring how the writings of Vaclav Havel resonate in Europe today.
According to NYU Prague professor Petr Mucha, „Forum 2000 is to human rights what Davos is to economics– it is the place where people of many different backgrounds and cultures come to share ideas about global issues that affect us all. It is a unique event that has an open atmosphere and welcomes to public. World leaders share ideas with human rights activitists who have struggled– and it happens thanks to the legacy of Vaclav Havel.“ Forum 2000 was founded by former Czech President Havel in the year 1996, and every year it creates a platform where delegates share experiences with each other and the public.
Speakers at this year’s forum included Nobel laureate Frederic de Klerk, renowned British philosopher Roger Scruton, and Alex Chow- one of the student leaders of the umbrella movement in Hong Kong, and dissidents from around the world.
NYU Prague student Oriana Mansur (CAS 17), a Politics and Middle Eastern Studies major, came to Prague knowing that she wanted to volunteer for the conference. She was chosen to be a reporter– assigned to attend 5 panels and write a one-page summary of each. „Forum 2000 is a great way to inform people about problems in the world and discuss solutions,“said Mansur. „The panelists – who are often activists, journalists or dissidents – have great ideas but might not have the power to change things. Forum 2000 can help their voices be heard.“
The former mayor of Caracas, Lopolodo Lopez, was notably absent from the conference, as he is in jail for allegedly conspiring against the authoritarian Venezuelan regime. „I was shocked to learn that someone is killed every 20 minutes in Venezuela – and that there are 78 political prisoners,“said Mansur, whose mother is Venezuelan. To highlight the atrocities around the world, the speakers at the opening ceremony were all dissidents who gave testimony about their personal experiences fighting against totalitarian regimes – including Lopez’s wife, who was speaking on his behalf.
Unsurprisingly the refugee crisis in Europe was a main topic in many discussions. At the panel at NYU Prague, speakers considered what Vaclav Havel would have said in light of the current situation. Irina Lagunina, the head of the Russian Department at Radio Free Europe, traced examples of how Russian media is influencing the media in Western Europe. „Demons can awaken other demons,“ wrote Vaclav Havel – words that she believes still resonate today, as populist leaders use fear and misinformation to incite extremist views.
Sister Cyril Mooney, an Irish nun who founded a school for underprivileged children in India, urged listeners at Forum 2000 to think about education of the heart, not of the brain. Petr Mucha agrees. „Education is becoming more compartmentalized – more about how to get a better job, and lacking an ethical, spirtual aspect. Education should be about love of knowledge –if that is missing, then democracy can be endangered.“
Video recordings of many panels of Forum 2000, including the opening ceremony, can be found here: http://www.forum2000.cz/en/projects/forum-2000-conferences/-2015/video-recordings/

The PragueCast Podcast

Prague scene
Last year, Rob Cameron, Prague’s BBC correspondent, approached NYU Prague with the idea of launching PragueCast – a podcast with stories of Prague told through the eyes of our students. The plan was ambitious: to produce monthly 20-minute editions, each with a different theme chosen by students, and distribute it to an audience beyond NYU Prague. Students would write, record, produce, edit, and market the episodes – all as non-credit extracurricular program that would meet in the evenings.
One year later, the results surprise everyone. Two teams of students – one in the fall, one in the spring- have produced six high-quality episodes that tell stories in a sensitive, insightful and dramatic way. Last semester students recorded footage from the 25th anniversary celebrations of the Velvet Revolution, including interviews at a demonstration against the current Czech president. This semester, an episode entitled Survivors was inspired by the 70th anniversary of the end of WWII; there are stories about a Holocaust survivor, a WW2 pilot shot down over Nazi Germany, and a victim of the Communist era who was imprisoned in the 1950s.
This voluntary, non-credit program is very popular – and not just among journalism majors. Students of all disciplines apply, and it is becoming increasingly competitive to join. The podcast includes original theme music composed by Dalton Corr, a music student who was at NYU Prague when the program started in the fall.
According to Tom Ishizuka a sophomore in CAS studying economics environmental studies, „we were able to work on every aspect of podcast production: recording, interviewing, script writing, sound editing, and presenting. I decided to participate on a whim due to my personal interest in podcasts, and I’ve found that I now possess a greater appreciation for some of the shows that I listen to. .. I felt the quality of programming we were able to produce was exceptionally high.“
Winona Rinkacs agrees. “The PragueCast was a great experience for me. It allowed me to interact with locals and explore parts of Prague I would not have seen otherwise. Thanks to the PragueCast, I was able to talk to an elementary student, a gulag survivor, and a matchmaker about what life in the Czech Republic is like…. I enjoyed co-writing the script to string all the individual stories together and presenting in Rob’s fancy sound studio.”
Is Rob Cameron satisfied with the project? “I’ve been genuinely impressed with what we’ve been able to achieve in less than a year. This is thanks to the incredible dedication and energy shown by the PragueCast teams. Every Tuesday night we’ve hunched over our laptops and the occasional pizza, turning vague ideas into broadcast-quality audio. It’s been a delight to work with them.I can’t wait to meet a fresh bunch of PragueCasters in the fall of 2015.”
You can download all episodes at https://soundcloud.com/nyupraguecast.
Photos by Laura Zablit

NYU Prague and Steindhardt collaborate on Citygram-Sound Project

Citigram image
On Friday night, Czech Radio is launching the world premiere of four unusual electroacoustic compositions that combine audio from New York City with recordings from Prague, exploring both cities through their sounds. The project was created under the umbrella of the Citigram – a program started by NYU Steindhardt – and produced for Czech Radio by NYU Prague professor Michal Rataj. The program can be heard around the world Friday, April 24 at 10 p.m. Prague time (4 p.m. EST) at http://www.rozhlas.cz/radiocustica_english/portal/
Professors Michal Rataj at NYU Prague and Tae Hong Park at Steindhardt are both are composers of electroacoustic music – a relatively new field that incorporates, manipulates and experiments with digital sounds in compositions. These two professors joined forces thanks to Evan Kent, an NYU music student who was in Michal Rataj’s composition class in 2013 suggested the two should meet.
The project of Citigram started a few years earlier in New York in 2011, when Professor Park became interested in the idea of digital maps like Google maps. There were so many surrounding us, but none of them had any sound. This seemed wrong – how can you understand a city without sound? Collaborating with colleagues, he decided to build sound maps, creating compositions that, using new recording technology, could represent a place in a way that that is not dependent on visuals –often using abstract compositions to evoke the rhythms of the city. According to Professor Park, “Citigram aims to look at ways of using sound maps as an interactive map for users. Anyone with a computer with a microphone could stream data from our server and create their own musical pieces – as has been done for the radio project in Prague.“
Former NYU Prague student and musician Evan Kent, who studied under Michal Rataj in 2013, has created one of the compositions that will be premiered on Friday. Evan has taken soundscapes from New York and Prague. “Navigating space between the documentation and the composition has been important for me lately. Speech scapes allowed me to work with text in a semantic way, as one might hear in instrumental music.“
Current NYU Prague students Jack Bandarenko, Austin Guerrazzi, Darien Henshaw, Georgia Mills, Evan Wardel are all taking Michal Rataj’s class and were also involved in the project, making recordings of a Prague soundscape that were used in the pieces.
Another piece premiering on Friday is called “Aggressive City Rhythms” and uses urban sound data collected in Prague and New York. Composer Michael Musick explains that “The piece invokes the excitement and controlled aggression that soundscapes of these cities offer their citizens.“
The possibilities of Citigram are huge, and the Center for Urban Science and Progress at NYU has been involved in analyzing the urban spatio-acoustic noise. Citigram has also been collaborating with CalArts and including soundscapes of LA. The involvement of another NYU campus on another continent offers an exciting new dimension to the project, especially as the world is becoming increasingly urban. Profesor Park notes that “this is the first time in human history that 50% of the entire population is living in cities – and it should be 70% in 2050. The number one complaint of New Yorkers is noise pollution. The maps that are being developed can explore this, serve as a utility for people.“
We hope you join us here in Prague on Friday!
More information about the project is available on the website.

NYU Prague student Alyssa Parkhurst on fencing with the Czech national team and more

Alyssa Parkhurst fencing
What is your school affiliation and what year are you? What is your major (if declared)?
NYU Senior, Class of 2015. Major: Russian & Slavic Studies
What inspired you to study in Prague?
As a Russian/Slavic Studies major I must study in a Slavic-speaking country and/or country influenced by Russia.
Several friends on the NYU fencing team, which I’ve been a member of throughout my undergraduate studies, studied abroad in Prague during their time at NYU and highly recommended it to me.
How has your experience been thus far?
My experience in Prague was amazing from day one. The first time I realized I felt so at home in Prague was in September at the beginning of the Fall semester when my friends and I were on our way back from a weekend trip to Berlin. My friends were very sad to be leaving Berlin and wished they could’ve spent more time there and even said that they wished they had chosen Berlin as their study abroad site rather than Prague. I, however, was so happy and relieved to be coming back to Prague, although like my friends I certainly enjoyed my brief time in Berlin. Other than the obvious beauty of the city, I find the people in Prague exceedingly polite and helpful, although in a different way than in the US. Most of all being in Prague has taught me to not impose my own cultural views, such as friendship, courtesy, and respect, onto another culture that is in no way connected to my own, and to take one day at a time. For example, being competitive means one thing in the US and another thing entirely in the Czech Republic. This applies to almost anything, and especially to the things I’ve mentioned above (friendship, courtesy, etc.).
Are you interning and, if so, how have you found the internship experience?
Although I am not interning here in Prague, I have had the opportunity to take classes that are very specific to my major/interests and which arguably have taught me more than my classes back in New York. Last semester I took a class on Sociology of Communist Czechoslovakia, History of Nationalism in Central/Eastern Europe, and Politics of the European Union, and this semester I’m taking Czech Literature, Law + Human Rights in Central/Eastern Europe. These classes have taught me so much about the Czech Republic and also about its relationship to the East and to the West.
I understand that you are from a fencer and are training with the national fencing team in the Czech Republic. Can you describe that experience?
I started training shortly after I arrived in Prague, in September, at Sports Centrum Praha in Letňany, a neighborhood in the Northeast corner of the city. This club is recognized as the best club in the Czech Republic and is the main training facility for the members of the men’s epee national team, as well as the majority of the junior and cadet fencers who represent CR (there are three official age groups in fencing: cadet, junior, and senior). The head coach of the national team is also the head coach of the club.
I think training at SC was the best decision I made during my time in Prague and it was definitely a huge part of my decision to stay in Prague for a second semester. The fencers and the coaches have been so welcoming and are happy to have a fencer from abroad training with them on a regular basis. think they also like having another female fencer at their club as women’s fencing is several steps behind men’s fencing in the Czech Republic and the majority of young girls who start fencing stop by the time they are looking to go to college.
The fencers at SC are a very tight-knit group and really make huge efforts to include me in that group; they always invite me to events such as holiday parties, birthday celebrations, tournaments, training camps, and even after-practice drinks. The national team members in particular are a huge inspiration to me as a fencer and as a person. They work very hard, in some cases training up to three times in a day, with a private lesson with their coach in the morning, followed by strength and conditioning training, followed by fencing in the evening. hey are very impressive when it comes to their mindset/mentality toward fencing. They never refuse to fence with someone just because they are younger or at another level with their fencing. They approach each bout (what a match is called in fencing) with the same amount of effort and know that something can be gained/learned by fencing with any fencer regardless of their age or their ability. Also impressive is their dynamic as a team. Fencing is an individual sport and as such can create serious problems for the “team dynamic” and for the success of its members, because as a fencer you are a member of the team but are competing against your team members just as you are competing against fencers from other countries. However, the Czech fencers really support each other and are genuinely happy to see each other succeed, even if one fencer is having a particularly bad day while another is doing exceptionally well. They know that doing well personally is important, but being successful at a tournament or competition is also important for the country and for representing the Czech Republic.
How did you come to train with them? What advice would you have to other students studying away who may be keen to pursue athletic or other interests overseas?
I first came to know about SC Praha from a friend of mine who graduated from NYU in 2011 and also studied abroad in Prague. He was also a member of the NYU fencing team and fenced several times at SC to avoid getting rusty/out of shape; it is well known among fencers that taking a break from training even for 2 weeks can really hit hard. In this way it is quite the opposite from riding a bike. Luckily, my friend told me the name of the club where he had fenced at, so the rest of the process was very simple. I searched on Google Maps for the name and address of the facility and how to get there, and went. When I got there I sought out the coaches and asked them if I could train there, what days/times they hold their practices, and how much it costs to be a member. With that information, I left and returned the next day to start training. Everything really took off from there; I have been training at SC consistently Tuesdays through Thursdays at their practices. I also have participated in two training camps hosted by SC that are open to those fencers in the Czech Republic who are nationally ranked, and have fenced in two national tournaments (I am currently ranked 34th).
I regard training at SC as the best decision I made while abroad in Prague and would highly encourage any other student to pursue their interests while overseas, even if it is not necessarily an athletic interest. It can be really easy to feel out of place or like an outsider while studying abroad, and pursuing some personal interest is the best way to overcome this feeling, make new friends, and learn about a new culture. I admit that it is very intimidating to put yourself in a new situation; my first couple weeks at SC I was even nervous to ask people if they would fence a bout with me because I had no idea how they would react.
I think pursuing some personal interest is also a great way to overcome the sense of homesickness and the general strangeness of being abroad. Fencing was great for me because it is something I always did in New York, so even though I was in a completely different place I was able to maintain something from back home that I consider a huge part of my life. Pursuing an interest abroad teaches you more in general about any vocation. For example, with fencing, I was able to notice different attitudes toward things such as friendship, competition, and hard work. Plus, I was able to see differences in the fencing style and habits of Czech fencers versus fencers in the US. Getting another perspective is never a bad thing, in my opinion.
Has training with the Czech team changed or informed your experience in Prague? If so, how?
Training with the Czech team has really given me insight into what it means to be an athlete in CR and what it means to be Czech. I am certain that without fencing, I would not have been so enthralled by my experience in Prague and would not have decided to return to Prague for a second semester. There are so many things that fencing gave me access to that are not related to fencing but related to the great friendships I cultivated as a result of it; for example, going to pubs with other young fencers, going to birthday celebrations, and celebrating holidays such as Easter. Training with the Czechs has also given me such a sense of pride in the Czech Republic and in knowing so much about the country and its people.
I think it could be very easy to live in Prague for a semester and leave still a tourist. Luckily because of fencing, this was not the case for me. The friendships and hours of fencing in Prague will always stay with me and will continue to give me a sense of greater perspective when it comes to sports and life in general.
Alyssa Parkhurst fencing 2

NYU Prague Site Director launches the English translation of his novel

Jiří Pehe is well-known as a political analyst, a prolific writer of news commentary and the former political adviser to President Vaclav Havel. Fewer people know that he is also a novelist who has published three books in Czech over the past ten years. In December, he launched the first English translation of one of his novels – Three Faces of an Angel – at the Vaclav Havel Library in Prague and at the School of Slavonic and East European Studies, University College London as well as at the Czech Embassy in London. Another launch is planned for the spring of 2015 in New York City.
Pehenovel1.jpg
[Photo Credit: (c) Vaclav Havel Library / Vojtěch Stádník] Described by Czech award-winning author Ivan Klima as “one of the most outstanding novels written in the Czech lands since 1989,“ Pehe’s book tells the story of three generations of a Czech-German-Jewish family in the 20th century. The tragic events of this period of Central European history are intertwined with the characters‘ stories: a talented musician is forced to become a soldier for the Austrian Empire during WWI… a teenage girl hides from the Nazis in a cellar for a year… an idealist joins the Communist party and is then persecuted by its leaders … a student fights for freedom during the Prague Spring….. Characters grapple with questions about history, politics, identity and religion. In the forward to the book, Dr. Marketa Goetz-Stankiewitz writes that „the novel uncovers this turbulent period with its linguistic, national and racial complexities: its brutality occasionally tempered by humour, and ultimately its absurdity.“
Pehenovel2.jpg
[Photo Credit: (c) Vaclav Havel Library / Vojtěch Stádník] Language plays a central role in the book: characters grow up speaking Czech and German, and the choice of which language to speak is closely linked to their sense of identity. Translator Gerald Turner had to find distinct voices for the three narrators: a man educated in German but writing in Czech, a woman with only an elementary-school education writing her memoir, and a Czech university professor living in the USA.
Jiří Pehe says: “I was pleasantly surprised by the large audiences at all three book launches as well as the lively discussions the novel’s themes provoked. Hopefully, many English-language readers will agree with the quote on the back cover by Tomas Halik, this year’s winner of the prestigious Templeton Prize; that this is an unusual novel about the 20th century, the Holocaust and in particular also about God. Those three topics were foremost on my mind when I starting writing the novel.“

NYU Prague Hosts Journalists from around the World

The collapse of the Iron Curtain led to the sudden creation of free media – so what does the media in post-Soviet countries look like today?
Prague_Event.jpg
Over 50 journalists, scholars, and media analysts from around the world met at NYU Prague last week to talk about this question – and many more – at a conference entitled 25 Years After: The Challenge of Building the Post-Communist Media and Communications Industries.
Prague_Event1.jpg
The conference was co-organized by two Prague-based NGOs: Keynote and the newsmagazine Transitions Online. Jeremy Druker, Professor of Social Media Networking at NYU Prague and the co-founder of Transitions Online, explained their motivation for organizing the event: “Academics and working journalists don’t often mix. So we decided to create a rare opportunity where researchers on the media’s transition would sit side-by-side on panels with journalists experiencing that very transition from the inside.”
The variety of countries represented brought extremely different perspectives: in addition to numerous delegates from the Czech Republic, there were also speakers from Poland, Hungary, Belarus, Serbia, Italy, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia, Albania, Romania, Georgia, Austria, Belgium, France, Sweden, Denmark, the UK, Canada, and the US. Their professions were also divergent, including professors, the senior communications manager of Google, activists, journalists, and analysts.
The shadow of Russia and her influence over post-Soviet countries loomed large in discussions. Keynote speaker Jeffrey Gedmin, former President of Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty, noted that “Communism is not coming back, but history is coming back to this part of the world.”
Jiri Pehe, Director of NYU Prague, said he believes that media is more balanced and more pluralistic than it was initially after the fall of Communism, but it is now especially vulnerable to the rise of local oligarchs who are buying up media organizations. “You can establish democratic institutions quickly, but it takes a few generations to establish a democratic culture,” said Pehe. “We aren’t over the stage of post-Communism at all.”

NYU Prague Site Director Jiří Pehe in Conversation with Rob Cameron about his life in honour of the 25th Anniversary of the Velvet Revolution

Jiri PeheNYU Prague Site Director Jiří Pehe spent six years as a senior political advisor to the late Czech president Václav Havel, a position that allowed him unique access to the inner circle of the renowned former dissident, playwright and political leader. Pehe, born in Czechoslovakia in 1955, fled his country in 1981 – escaping the communist bloc in the trunk of a car. He made a new life for himself in America, worked for Radio Free Europe in Munich, and finally moved back to Prague in 1995.
candles
Jiří: I was born in a town in Western Bohemia called Rokycany, into the family of a military officer. My father ran into problems after the 1968 Soviet invasion, and with him the whole family. So I grew up changing schools quite often, because my father was always being transferred from one place to another – up until 1968 because he’d been promoted or deployed somewhere, after 1968 as a matter of punishment because he’d opposed the invasion”
Rob: So you were a Czech ‘army brat’, to use the American term.
Jiří: Yeah, I was to some extent, but in the context that people in the U.S. don’t really know. That is that even the fortunes of a military officer could be changed by ’68, depending on how they saw their army mission; whether they saw it as mainly serving communism or mainly as serving their country. And I think that was the line that many officers in 1968 had to draw.
Rob: Was your father expelled from the army, or did he stay until he retired?
Jiří: My father stayed in the army, but he could no longer be promoted. So he was shifted around to various jobs, such as a facility in Moravia which repaired tanks and so on. He really wasn’t allowed to remain in any commanding position.
Rob: Was he in the Party?
Jiří: Before 68, yes. Yes.
Rob: And then he renounced it? Or he was expelled?
Jiří: I don’t exactly know what happened. To this day he doesn’t like to talk about it. I guess it’s one of those traumatic experiences that if you don’t want to upset your old parents, you don’t go into.
Rob: What did your father’s opposition to the invasion mean for you, as a boy in his early teens?
Jiří: It meant some problems getting into high school, and later on university. I wanted to study philosophy, but that wasn’t really possible with my political profile. So in the end I got into law school at Prague’s Charles University. There I managed to start parallel studies at the Philosophy Faculty, and the advantage of that was that you could choose your courses. So you could bypass Marxist-Leninism, Scientific Communism and all that crap. I mainly focused on the Greek philosophers, medieval philosophy, and then German philosophers of the 19th century.
Rob: So you graduated when?
Jiří: I graduated in 1978. But then I had to go for a year into the Czechoslovak Army.
Rob: Of course, as all men then did.
Jiří: Yes, it was mandatory. I was actually assigned to a tank unit. And that was a terrible experience. I really didn’t like it. In the end I managed to get a transfer to a unit that was responsible for refuelling the tanks. So I was actually in charge of a small gas station for most of my army duty.
Rob: So you didn’t like being cooped up in the tanks themselves.
Jiří: Not really, no. I’m slightly claustrophobic, so I really didn’t enjoy the exercises where we had to drive the tank underwater. Sometimes the tank got stuck, and it would take them a few hours to pull us out. It was torture for me. I was glad to get a transfer somewhere else.
Rob: Tell me about your political consciousness at that point. Did you already feel in opposition to the regime?
Jiří: I have to say it was a gradual process. But it was greatly helped by the events of ’68. You could divide it into several stages; before ’68, when we lived in this sweet oblivion. As kids we believed the system was basically good. And of course we were told in school that the Soviet Union was our friend. I think our parents really tried very hard not to contradict this very much. After ’68, things changed very quickly. We were all exposed to this shock, and at the age of 13 I suddenly saw what the regime was all about. But my real eye-opening wasn’t until the first years of university in Prague, when I started reading dissident and samizdat publications at my uncle’s apartment – he was a journalist. It was like visiting a different world, a different era, much freer and intellectually much more advanced than the era we were forced to live in.
students commemorating the anniversary
Rob: Were you aware at that point of Václav Havel and the dissidents grouped around him?
Jiří: Well all of us listened to Radio Free Europe and Voice of America. So we followed what Havel and the others were saying. Of course we were all aware of what they did in 1977, when they signed the Charter 77 human rights declaration. And actually many of us in the student community had to resolve a dilemma – if I sign this at the age of 22, I will be thrown out of university immediately. I will be forced to do menial jobs, maybe for the rest of my life. I will probably also harm all the members of my family, who will be persecuted. The second option was to go along with the regime. And the third was to try to leave. Leaving was highly risky. Everyone knew you had to plan it carefully. But I chose the third option. I decided that as soon as I finished university I would use the first opportunity to leave. And I did so in 1981.
Rob: How did you manage it?
Jiří: My first wife and I managed to get on a trip to Yugoslavia. It was a communist country, but one with a more liberal regime. If you went with an organised tour group, and got all the stamps, you could go. So we got on this holiday to Crikvenica, a coastal town in today’s Croatia. It wasn’t easy to get out of Yugoslavia. We first tried to do it by getting a bus from Koper [now in Slovenia] – across the border to Trieste in Italy. The problem was that the Czechoslovak authorities had put a stamp in our passports saying that this passport was only valid to enter Yugoslavia. So each time we tried to cross the Yugoslav-Italian border they turned us back. After three or days we went back to Crikvenica, where the Czechoslovak tour guide told us that we’d been reported to the authorities in Prague. As soon as we heard that, we started asking German and Austrian tourists to take us across the border.
Rob: In the trunk of their car you mean?
Jiří: Yes. Of course most of them were afraid. In the end we met two Austrian students who had a Citroën 2CV. And they basically loaded us into the trunk.
Rob: The trunk of a Citroën 2CV? That’s not a big car.
Jiří: Yes. Two adults in the trunk of a Citroën 2CV. It was one of the most terrible experiences of my life. The trunk was small for one person, let alone two. They drove us to the border crossing, stopped in a field, crammed us into the trunk, and went across the border. We had to wait at the Italian border for about 40 minutes, and the fumes went into the trunk. Also we couldn’t move. We thought we would suffocate. But then the car suddenly started moving, then stopped again, and the trunk opened. We fell out into the dust; we had no blood circulation left in our legs. And I still remember these two students – it was a he and she, she was eight months’ pregnant – dancing around us and screaming ‘Freiheit!’ (Freedom!). And that was my first impression of the West.
Rob: What was going through your mind at that point?
Jiří: Well of course that we were free, that’d we’d managed to do it, but at the same time we knew that’d we’d basically lost our families. Because it was impossible to go back, and we didn’t know whether we would ever see our parents again.
There followed several weeks in prison, then an Italian refugee camp, then emigration to the U.S., where Jiří Pehe and his wife were granted asylum as political refugees. His first job was as a night receptionist at the Hotel Algonquin in New York, where he read voraciously and improved his English. After that he studied international relations at Columbia University, worked for Freedom House and finally joined Radio Free Europe, as an analyst at the broadcaster’s then headquarters in Munich, in 1988. It was thanks to RFE that Jiří was to set foot on his native soil once again, a few days after the start of the Velvet Revolution in November 1989. The head of RFE’s Czechoslovak Section Pavel Pecháček – the first journalist to report live from the demonstrations on Wenceslas Square – had been expelled, and RFE were looking for someone to replace him.
Jiří: I actually had to go to the Czechoslovak embassy in Bonn, and when I got there, the staff of the embassy including the ambassador were lined up outside waiting for me. They told me how they’d been listening to Radio Free Europe for such a long time and how they were so happy to be able to give me a visa! That was the moment I really understood that the revolution had won. Because if all of these former spies and agents were lined up to welcome someone like me, it was clear they knew the game was up. So I went to Prague.
Rob: How did you travel?
Jiří: I took a plane, from Bonn. I remember my first impressions were very unpleasant. When I arrived at the airport, it was still this communist-style airport, with dour officials and so on. And then I saw Prague, and of course when you spend a lot of time away from your home, with the idea you will never come back, you tend to idealise the place. And what I saw after all those years living in the West, in New York and Munich, was basically a decrepit, unfriendly city, with a lot of smog and pollution. Of course it was also very joyful; I was able to see my parents, I was able to go to a lot of places where history was taking place, and meeting people who were making history.
Rob: That must have been an incredible time.
Jiří: I’ll tell you just one anecdote to document how history was happening. I remember that on the 10th of December 1989, I went to the apartment of the dissident Petr Uhl. Civic Forum had just managed to negotiate a compromise with the Communist regime, and it was the day that a government of national reconciliation – in which half of the seats were taken by Communists and half by dissidents – was named. As I got to his apartment, the phone rang. For many years under communism, Uhl had been employed as a coal stoker in a boiler room, with his friend and fellow dissident Jiri Dienstbier. And the guy on the phone was one of their colleagues – he was a stoker, not a dissident. And I could hear this guy saying to Uhl – so what’s going on? Are you and Dienstbier coming to work tonight? And Uhl said – well, I don’t know how to tell you this, but Dienstbier has just been named the Minister of Foreign Affairs. There was this long silence, and then the guy said – So is he coming to work or not? So Uhl said – Well yeah, he’s coming for one more shift – he’s not going to leave you in a bind – but tomorrow he’s going on an official visit to Germany.

In 1995 Radio Free Europe moved to Prague. Two years later, Jiří became chief political advisor to President Václav Havel. It was a position which has to a degree defined him. Today he’s regarded – rightly or wrongly – as one of the guardians of Havel’s legacy, and in the polarised Czech society that is certainly not an unequivocally positive label. A respected political commentator, he has many ideological enemies, chief among them Havel’s nemesis and successor Václav Klaus. The Czech transition from communism to democracy certainly hasn’t been smooth, but as Jiří says, it is still very much a work in progress.

Jiří :Ralf Dahrendorf said in his famous speech on transition in 1990 that it will take us about five years to establish a system of political democracy. It’ll take about 10 years to establish a sort-of functioning market economy. It’ll take fifteen years to establish the rule of law. But it’ll take about 60 years – two generations – to create a real, fully-fledged democracy with a functioning civil society. And we really didn’t know what this meant, what he was talking about – if we have all of these institutions and mechanisms in place, we have democracy, no? What he meant is that democracy has two faces. One is institutional and procedural, and one is cultural. It’s a long process. It’s a generational process. In the Old Testament, Moses takes the Jews out of Egypt, and then they spend two generations in the desert. That’s not a coincidence. It’s to signify that it takes two generations to transform a nation of slaves into a self-respecting nation that can find its homeland.
Rob Cameron is the BBC’s Prague correspondent and a former NYU Prague professor, currently working with students on a new podcast program that started in the fall semester. You can hear the latest edition, on the 25th anniversary of the Velvet Revolution, here: https://soundcloud.com/nyupraguecast/velvet-anniversary
commemorating the revolution
PHOTO CREDITS: Laura Zablit

NYU Prague Students Meet World Leaders at Forum 2000 Conference

Forum 2000
NYU Prague students worked around the clock as reporters for the recent Forum 2000 Conference, Democracy and its Discontents a Quarter of a Century after the Iron Curtain and Tiananmen Square. This annual event was founded by Vaclav Havel to bring together world leaders, activists, artists and dissidents.
NYU Prague students – along with students from other local universities – reported the spontaneous and sometimes controversial remarks of panelists such as Mikhail Khodorkovsky, one of Russia’s leading businessman and longest-serving political prisoners. “My job was to summarize in two paragraphs what was discussed in the panels; I had to make sure that I conveyed the basic sense of what everyone said and figure out the narrative of the panel,” said NYU student reporter Alex Braverman, who covered 5 panels in two days. These reports were then posted on the website and became part of the official archive of Forum 2000. “It was a whirlwind – the most intense two days of my life.”
Before each panel started student reporters introduced themselves to the panel moderators, who included former US and Czech ambassadors, the director of Amnesty International and other international nonprofits, Czech governmental ministers, and former presidents.
“I am a history major, it was very cool to see people you usually only see on a screen. In the debates, much more original thoughts came out than when you see public speakers giving scripted speeches.” said Alex Braverman. “On one panel about Egypt, there was a representative of the Egyptian government. His comments sparked an intense argument with the other panelists from the West – I don’t think anyone expected it to get so passionate.”
The entire process of reporting on the 66 panels at this huge conference was coordinated by intern and NYU Prague student Lillian Marx. “It was intense week,” said Lillian, who also was in charge of editing all of the material that came to her. “The Forum 2000 full-time professional staff is young and dependent on volunteer interns- I couldn’t believe the responsibility that I was given.”
In addition to Lillian and her staff of student reporters, other students could attend events, which were free and open to the public. Russian language professor Tatiana Stihelova took students to a presentation by keynote speaker Mikhail Khodorkovsky so they could hear the language and see world-famous figures in person. Yena Oh, one of her students, studies US politics. “I came in to the conference with little knowledge about the politics of Russia. My eyes were opened to so many different perspectives. Especially because we’re so close to Russia here, events there seem even more relevant.”
Alex Braverman also was struck by how her perspective broadened at the conference. “I had no idea how repressive the governments of Belarus and Azerbaijan were Ales Bialiatski [a human rights activist in Belarus and Nobel Peace Prize nominee] was at the Forum; he was just out of prison. Before this conference, I hadn’t thought about political prisoners as such an issue. It is so potent when you see them in front of you and realize what issues people in different countries struggle against.”
Tammy Tan was another NYU Prague student reporter. “The fact that we were able to participate and hear from world leaders and disruptive figures was simply amazing. Whilst many of the speakers came from around the world, the majority of them were from Europe and the Middle East and that allowed speakers to take from their cultural background and inject their own perspectives. For example, during the Middle Eastern panel, I wasn’t surprised to see the growing discontent amongst the panelists with regards to the US and their questionable foreign policies. I feel that if the conference were to be held in NYC, it would definitely be more high profile and the issues would be addressed from an American standpoint.“
Several students noted how optimistic many people on the panels and in the audiences were when it came to concepts of democracy. “It seems like the further removed you are from the fight for democracy, the more skeptical you are about it,” noted Alex. “For us, democracy is a given. But here, they are only one generation removed from democracy. If you had had the conference in NYC, there would have been much more cynicism. The experience at Forum made me so grateful to live in a country that’s guaranteed to stay democratic, and it made me question why we’re so cynical about democracy.”
Vaclav Havel created the Forum to promote dialogue; this dialogue continues, and our students took a very active role in the 2014 conference. “I felt extremely humbled to hear first-hand from these key figures about how they have affected change,“ said Tammy Tan. “The most valuable aspect of the Forum 2000 experience was seeing people from all walks of life join together for one night to discuss, contemplate, and provoke further dialogue about issues that may not be actively prominent in the news, but are nevertheless being constantly endured by communities around the world.“
One of the Forum 2000 events took place at NYU Prague, which hosted a panel exploring religion in Europe and its effect on identity. The panel, which included the 2014 Templeton Prize laureate Tomas Halik, can be heard at online at https://soundcloud.com/nyuprague/nyu-pragueforum-2000-panel-discussion-european-identity-and-religion.
Forum 2000

Commemorating the 25th Anniversary of the Velvet Revolution at NYU Prague

memorial
This coming November marks the 25th anniversary of the Velvet Revolution and the end of Communism in Czechoslovakia. How relevant is this anniversary to students who were born sevaral years after the Berlin Wall came down?
Very, according to NYU Prague, whose faculty includes many former leaders of the Velvet Revolution. Professor Jan Urban, one of the leading dissidents under the Communist regime, is dismayed by the current strength of the Communist party, which – unlike in most other former Eastern European countries – was not disbanded 25 years ago. „What’s there to celebrate today? The Communists in Parliament are in complete support of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, and their popularity is growing. Czechs are forgetting what the Russians did to us.“
Many NYU students are still interested in this “ancient history.” Some of NYU Prague’s most popular courses are taught by former dissidents. Last semester, one student wrote a profile for the Prague Wandering Webzine on Monika Pajerova, our professor and one of the few female student leaders during the Velvet Revolution http://praguewandering.com/2014/05/20/2578/.
NYU Prague is marking the anniversary by a number of programs that reflect upon the past and the future Particularly in light of current events in Ukraine – which have been compared to the Russian invasion of Czechoslovakia in 1968- the anniversary seems especially important.
Vaclav Havel
During orientation, NYU Prague students met with young Czech people at a panel discussion entitled „The Velvet Revolution 25 Years Later: Views of Current Czech University Students.“ The Czech students on the panel described the lives of their parents and grandparents under Communism and discussed how that affected – and continues to affect- them. Several of them expressed their concerns about the rising popularity of the Communist party among young people, which currently is polled at over 15% of the national vote.
In October, NYU students will have the chance to meet meet Mikhail Gorbachev, the architect of perestroika, and over 150 other global leaders at the annual Forum 2000 Conference. The conference, inspired by the legacy of the late President Václav Havel, is entitled “Democracy and Its Discontents: A Quarter-Century After the Iron Curtain and Tiananmen” and will take place in Prague and other Central European cities.
NYU Prague is hosting another conference – this one focused on the media and the challenges of building the post-Communist media and communication industries over the past 25 years. NYU Prague Professor Jeremy Druker, director of the international news outlet Transitions Online, is organizing the event in cooperation with Keynote.cz and has invited other NYU faculty to speak .”The event should provide a rare opportunity for academics who have written about the media transition and journalists who actually were there to meet in person and debate the positives and negatives of what has taken place,” Jeremy said. Thanks to funding from the U.S. Embassy and the International Visegrad Fund, select participants from the U.S. and from Central/Eastern Europe will attend.
Keith Jones, a documentary film-maker and frequent lecturer at NYU Prague, will screen his new film that is focused on Generation X in Czech alternative culture. It is set for release in November, and the Velvet Revolution plays a central role in the story.
During the week of November 17 – the actual anniversary of the Velvet Revolution- students can get a feeling for what life was like under totalitarian during „Communism Week“ – part of NYU Prague’s culture program Kulturama. Students will visit a nuclear bunker, go to the KGB and the Communism Museums, and can even participate in a team-building game that puts them in the role of political dissidents „trapped“ by the KGB. We will also take them to the Czech-Austrian border where a section of the Iron Curtain has been preserved and a museum is dedicated to stories about Czech’s attempts to cross the border.
Of course students can celebrate the anniversary with locals on November 17 – a national Czech holiday – by leaving a candle at the Velvet Revolution memorial site on Narodni trida (National Street). Every year, people gather around a small, understated plaque decorated by fingers raised in the „V“ for victory sign, located at the place where brave Czech university students confronted the Communist police in 1989 and set off a series of events that led to the end of Communism.
National Street
The events of 1989 and the fall of the Iron Curtain may seem like ancient history to young people today. “Events that happened 25 years ago may seem like an old story to students who weren’t even alive at the time,” acknowledges NYU Prague Director (and former dissident) Jiri Pehe. “But when we see what is happening in the contemporary world and watch efforts in various countries to achieve democracy, it is clear that many lessons can be learned from this history.”

NYU Prague launches KULTURAMA PRAHA!

Kulturama logoWhat is Kulturama? A complete guide to cultural life in Prague for our students, and a semester full of carefully-planned cultural programming created by NYU Prague Student Life Conselor Sarah Coffey.
From opera to cooking classes to puppets to politics to films – NYU Prague wants to introduce students to as many aspects of Czech culture as possible. Our goal is to immerse students in the cultural life of the city during their 3 months here and to help them see Prague in way that they, perhaps, couldn’t on their own.
NYU Prague has always offered rich cultural programming in Prague. Kulturama Praha will bring all of the diverse events under one umbrella, guiding students towards a better understanding of the events‘ relevance in European and Czech culture. It will include several theme weeks: Communism Week, which will coincide with the 25th anniversary of the Velvet Revolution, Culinary Week will include sessions on cooking Czech cuisine plus a visit to a gastronomy museum, and Alchemy Week will explore all aspects of mysticism in Prague and the legacy of Rudolf II, emperor during Renaissance times.
Already eighteen Kulturama Praha events are planned for this semester and more are in the pipeline. “Prague has a such a rich cultural life for the taking; here, culture is all around you,“ explained Sarah Coffey. “But it can be hard to find out about. I hope that students try things they’ve never been to before.“
So far, it seems like the sign-ups for events are filling up fast. What’s coming up in September? A staged reading of Vaclav Havel’s play Audience at the Vaclav Havel Library with well known Czech actors, a concert by little-known Czech composter Zelenka, lessons on how to make Czech dumplings, a concert by one of the best Czech Gypsy bands, a visit to an exhibition commemorating the 100-year anniversary of WWI. Some events are presented by NYU professors or leading Czech intellectuals.
Some Kulturama posters:
Download file
Download file