Tag Archives: Olivia Dixon

ASIC Releases New Immunity Policy for Market Misconduct Offences

by Olivia Dixon and Jennifer G. Hill

In late February 2021, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (“ASIC”) released a new policy[1] regarding immunity for a range of offences under Australian corporate law (the “ASIC policy”). The ASIC policy covers offences predominantly falling under the ‘market misconduct’ provisions of Part 7.10 of the Australian Corporations Act 2001 (“the Act”) and includes serious offences, such as market manipulation, insider trading and dishonest conduct in the course of operating a financial services business. The ASIC policy also contemplates criminal immunity being provided for “other Commonwealth offences connected with the Pt 7.10 offence.” Such offences may include ancillary liability offences such as aiding and abetting; breach of director’s duties; false accounting; and money laundering.

The ASIC policy is not entirely novel under Australian law. Its provisions closely resemble an immunity and cooperation policy for cartel conduct, most recently updated in 2019, by another regulator, the Australian Competition & Consumer Commission (the “ACCC policy”).[2]  The ACCC policy offers two forms of leniency for cartel participants who are willing to assist the ACCC in its investigation: (i) immunity:  the first cartel participant to approach the ACCC may be granted conditional immunity from civil enforcement actions, and potentially from criminal actions if it meets the necessary criteria; or (ii) cooperation:  if a cartel participant fails to meet the criteria for conditional immunity, it may still receive leniency from the ACCC or the court if it cooperates in the ACCC’s investigation.

Continue reading

Whistleblower Anti-retaliation Protections in Australian Corporate Codes of Conduct

by Dr. Olivia Dixon

Whistleblowing is considered to be an integral component of corporate governance by exposing and remedying corruption, fraud and other types of wrongdoing in both the public and private sector. Australian whistleblowing legislation emerged in the aftermath of the systemic government corruption inquiries of the late 1980’s, meaning that although whistleblower protection was squarely on the political agenda, legislative development was firmly fixed on the public sector. The Commonwealth, States and Territories have all enacted public sector whistleblower protection or public interest disclosure acts based on a structural approach, which prohibit retaliation against whistleblowers for reporting misconduct. While academic debate continues as to whether private sector legislation should ultimately be based on a structural, anti-retaliation, reward-based or blended model, political will to enact comprehensive private sector legislation has stagnated and current legal avenues that are available to targets of retaliation are inherently complex, fragmented and unpredictable. Continue reading