Tag Archives: Joshua Drew

Third Circuit Has Opportunity to Rule on Constitutionality of False Claims Act (FCA)

by Joshua Drew, Ian Herbert, Bradley Markano, and Connor Farrell

Left to right: Joshua Drew, Ian Herbert, Bradley Markano, and Connor Farrell (photos courtesy of Miller & Chevalier)

On July 14, 2025, Janssen filed an appeal to the Third Circuit challenging what it characterized in its brief as the “largest ever” judgment under the federal False Claims Act (FCA): approximately $1.6 billion, including over $1.2 billion in civil penalties and $360 million in treble damages. The scope of liability imposed on the healthcare company, along with unique facts underlying the case, present several important constitutional issues, including Article II-based challenges that the FCA’s qui tam provisions improperly delegate to relators the executive authority to pursue punitive quasi-criminal penalties, as well as whether the penalties imposed violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause or Eighth Amendment’s Excessive Fines Clause.

Continue reading

Guidance from Attachment C: Recent Resolutions Include DOJ Updates to the Requirements for an Effective Compliance Program

by Kathryn Cameron Atkinson, Joshua Drew, Matteson Ellis, and James G. Tillen

From left to right: Kathryn Cameron Atkinson, Joshua Drew, Matteson Ellis, and James G. Tillen. (Photos courtesy of Miller & Chevalier.)

Continuing with recent policy updates, the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) has revised its detailed requirements for effective corporate compliance programs found in “Attachment C[1] to better reflect its policy guidance and incorporate lessons learned from recent cases and monitorships. These edits focus on management commitment, training, third party management, remediating misconduct, monitoring and testing, compensation structures, and consequence management. 

Attachment C requirements present a clear guide to DOJ thinking on critical compliance program elements. They have become standardized over the years, and when DOJ revises or alters them, it is a noteworthy development for compliance professionals as well as practitioners. Companies defending their programs before DOJ will need to be prepared to address these new program criteria. 

Continue reading