Tag Archives: David Meister

Looking Back at Fall 2023 PCCE Events: CFTC Enforcement Director Announces Updates to the CFTC’s Enforcement Policies

As we prepare for a full schedule of events in 2024, starting with an event on Voluntary Self-Disclosure Policy for Export Controls Violations on January 16, 2024, the NYU School of Law Program on Corporate Compliance and Enforcement (PCCE) is taking a moment to reflect on our busy Fall 2023 program. In this post, we review our October 17, 2023 event featuring a corporate and individual enforcement policy announcement by the CFTC’s Director of Enforcement.

Photo of speakers

Ian McGinley, CFTC Director of Enforcement (©Myaskovsky: Courtesy of NYU Photo Bureau)

Continue reading

Former CFTC Enforcement Officials Comment on the CFTC’s New Enforcement Advisory

Photo of the authors

Left to Right: Panelists David Meister, Douglas Yatter, Elizabeth Davis, Jennifer Arlen (moderator), and James McDonald (©Myaskovsky: Courtesy of NYU Photo Bureau)

On October 17, 2023, the NYU Law Program on Corporate Compliance and Enforcement (PCCE) hosted Ian McGinley, the Director of Enforcement for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), to announce updated enforcement guidance to CFTC staff on penalties, monitors, and admissions. Director McGinley’s remarks (available here) were followed by a fireside chat and moderated Q&A with questions from the audience, and later by a moderated panel of former CFTC enforcement directors and senior enforcement counsel. The updated staff guidance is available here. In this post, the panelists from the event offer additional commentary on the guidance.

Continue reading

CFTC Issues New Enforcement Guidance on Cooperation Recognition in Its Orders

by David Meister, Jocelyn E. Strauber, Jonathan Marcus, Theodore M. Kneller, Chad E. Silverman, and Daniel B. O’Connell

On October 29, 2020, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) Division of Enforcement (Division) issued a memorandum (Guidance) providing guidance for Division staff to follow when recommending the recognition of an entity’s self-reporting, cooperation or remediation in CFTC orders settling administrative enforcement proceedings.[1]

The Guidance, which appears to focus primarily on the language to be used in orders that settle enforcement actions, states that it is intended to further the CFTC’s recently stated strategic goal of providing clarity. It does not change the Division’s existing practices for evaluating self-reporting, cooperation or remediation, including for purposes of recommending penalty reductions, which were set forth in various advisories from January to September 2017 (Advisories).[2] The Guidance does not touch on, for example, the amount of credit (e.g., with respect to the amount of a penalty discount) the Division will recommend for self-reporting, cooperation or remediation. Instead, for the first time, the Division is formalizing when and how Division staff will recommend self-reporting, cooperation or remediation be “recognized” — i.e., described — in CFTC orders.

Continue reading