by Shu-en Wee and Daniel Richman*
To what extent can a nonresident foreign national be prosecuted for violations of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA)[1] when he neither is an agent of a domestic concern nor has committed acts while physically present in U.S. territory? Does the fact that the FCPA explicitly creates criminal liability in only these two situations mean that he cannot be charged for conspiring to violate the Act, or aiding and abetting a violation? Such was the issue presented to Judge Janet Bond Arterton in United States v. Hoskins.[2] Her rejection of the government’s conspiracy and accomplice theories in that case is presently up on appeal in the Second Circuit, but an intervening Supreme Court case may well lead the Circuit to see the case a bit differently. Continue reading