Tag Archives: Daniel E. Newman

NY Attorney General Seeks Broad Authority Over Digital Assets

by Luigi L. De Ghenghi, Boaz B. Goldwater, Randall D. Guynn, Joseph A. Hall, Justin Levine, Daniel E. NewmanDavid L. Portilla, Gabriel D. Rosenberg, Margaret E. Tahyar, and Zachary J. Zweihorn

Photos of the authors

From top left to right: Luigi L. De Ghenghi, Boaz B. Goldwater, Randall D. Guynn, Joseph A. Hall, and Justin Levine.
From bottom left to right: Daniel E. Newman, David L. Portilla, Gabriel D. Rosenberg, Margaret E. Tahyar, and Zachary J. Zweihorn. (photos courtesy of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP)

The NY Attorney General is seeking legislation that would significantly expand the state’s reach over digital assets and require wholesale changes to the operation of digital asset businesses that choose to remain in New York.

Letitia James, the Attorney General of the State of New York (NYAG), released a proposed bill that—if taken up by the state legislature and enacted—would create the most comprehensive and restrictive digital asset regulatory regime in the United States.

Continue reading

Federal Reserve and FDIC Reports—Next Steps

Editor’s Note: The NYU School of Law Program on Corporate Compliance and Enforcement (PCCE) is watching the recent banking crisis and failures of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and, most recently, First Republic Bank.  PCCE is looking to publish additional posts in this area and those interested should contact joseph.facciponti@nyu.edu.

by Dana Seesel Bayersdorfer, Jung Eun Choi, Luigi L. De Ghenghi, Ledina Gocaj, Randall D. Guynn, Eric McLaughlin, Daniel E. Newman, David L. Portilla, Gabriel D. Rosenberg, and Margaret E. Tahyar

Photos of the authors

From top left to right: Dana Seesel Bayersdorfer, Jung Eun Choi, Luigi L. De Ghenghi, Ledina Gocaj, and Randall D. Guynn.
From bottom left to right: Eric McLaughlin, Daniel E. Newman, David L. Portilla, Gabriel D. Rosenberg, and Margaret E. Tahyar. (photos courtesy of Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP)

The Federal Reserve and the FDIC reports on their supervision of Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank provide insight into potential upcoming shifts in regulatory and supervisory focus.

The Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (Federal Reserve or Board) released the results of its review of the supervision and regulation of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), which was led by Vice Chair for Supervision Michael S. Barr (the Board Report),[1] and the FDIC released the results of its review of the supervision of Signature Bank,[2] which was led by FDIC Chief Risk Officer E. Marshall Gentry (the FDIC Report).[3]

Continue reading

NY DFS’ Virtual Currency Guidance for Banking Organizations

by Luigi L. De Ghenghi, Boaz B. Goldwater, Randall D. Guynn, Joseph A. Hall, Justin Levine, Eric McLaughlin, Daniel E. Newman, Gabriel D. Rosenberg, Margaret E. Tahyar, and Zachary J. Zweihorn

The New York Department of Financial Services (DFS) has released guidance that expands the scope of virtual currency activity for which New York banking organizations need prior approval.

The DFS has released guidance clarifying both the scope of and application process for virtual currency-related activities by NY banking organizations (the Guidance). The Guidance expresses the DFS’ expectation that all Covered Institutions[1]—New York-chartered banks and trust companies and foreign bank branches and agencies in New York—seek the DFS’ approval before engaging in any new or additional virtual currency-related activity.[2] The BitLicense regulations have always been clear that Covered Institutions that obtain approval from the DFS before engaging in virtual currency business activity[3] do not need to obtain a BitLicense from the DFS.[5] But the Guidance requires a Covered Institution to obtain approval before engaging in virtual currency-related activity, which includes but is not limited to virtual currency business activity. The Guidance, therefore, expands the scope of activities for which Covered Institutions must seek prior approval.

Continue reading

10 Key Takeaways from the Federal Reserve’s Final Rule on CSI and FOIA

by Luigi L. De Ghenghi, Randall D. GuynnJai R. Massari, Margaret E. Tahyar, Eric McLaughlin, Daniel E. Newman, and Eric B. Lewin 

The Federal Reserve’s recent updates to its regulations on confidential supervisory information (CSI) and availability of information under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA)[1] include several meaningful modifications to adapt these rules for the digital age of emails, data rooms and slide decks and the modern organizational structure and operations of banking organizations.  

Continue reading