by Ilene Knable Gotts, Nelson O. Fitts, Damian G. Didden, Christina C. Ma, and Emily E. Samra
Left to right: Ilene Knable Gotts, Nelson O. Fitts, Damian G. Didden, Christina C. Ma, and Emily E. Samra (photos courtesy of Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz)
As predicted, antitrust merger enforcement under the second Trump Administration exhibits a return to a more restrained approach at both the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the Department of Justice. Most refreshingly, the agencies appear committed to good faith engagement with merging parties. The FTC lifted its four-year “temporary” suspension of early terminations of the HSR waiting period, and a senior Division official recently stated that the DOJ will “not send ‘scarlet’ letters warning parties that they ‘close at their own risk’”—a practice adopted under the prior administration. In recent orders, the FTC highlighted the importance of Commission staff and merging parties working together in “good faith” during merger reviews. In public statements, both the FTC and DOJ have eschewed “turning the HSR review into an extortion racket.” These commitments reflect a welcome return to established patterns of antitrust practice, where proactive engagement with regulators can lead to efficient outcomes for lawful transactions.
Continue reading →
