by Alexander C.K. Wyman, Aron Potash, and Mikaela Wynne Gilbert-Lurie
![](https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/wp.nyu.edu/dist/4/3828/files/2023/10/Screen-Shot-2023-10-10-at-9.22.51-AM.png)
From left to right: Alexander C.K. Wyman, Aron Potash, and Mikaela Wynne Gilbert-Lurie. (Photos courtesy of Latham & Watkins LLP)
Utilities and energy companies can implement strategies to mitigate risks from more frequent environmental disasters and infrastructure failures.
In the early morning of June 11, 2023, a tanker truck carrying gasoline up I-95 in Philadelphia crashed and caught fire, and the overpass above buckled and collapsed. The section of the highway is critical to the roughly 160,000 vehicles that cross it daily. The immediate cause of the collapse is believed to be either the heat from the flames or the impact of the explosion weakening the steel beams supporting the overpass. Some, however, identified a more fundamental problem: “the fragility of the state’s aging infrastructure.”[1]
While the I-95 collapse presents a recent example of the significant risks associated with the US’s aging infrastructure, it is by no means unique. Many of the roads, bridges, dams, and electrical grids that keep the country running are decades old and often in need of repair. Infrastructure failures combined with environmental disasters can be catastrophic, and the consequences dire, for the public, the environment, and the utility or corporate entity potentially responsible for operating the failed infrastructure component. Moreover, a vicious cycle is often at work with respect to the environment and infrastructure failures in which, for example, extreme weather causes an infrastructure breakdown that in turn may result in environmental damage.
Continue reading →