Letter from the Editor
Staff Articles
- Mirror Neurons and Autism: A Social Perspective
- Misdiagnosis of Deaf Individuals: Toward a Culturally Sensitive Approach
- Peer Pressure and Alcohol Use amongst College Students
- The Masculine Experience in Psychotherapy: An Examination of Clinical Processes and Outcomes
- Effects of Supervisor-Employee Relationship on Job Performance
- School Based Interventions: How can unipolar depression and externalizing disorders in urban youth in America be prevented by school interventions?
- Reconsidering Parental Involvement: Implications for Black Parents
Steven O. Roberts
A preponderance of studies operationally define parental involvement as specific acts of engagement, such as helping children with their homework, volunteering in schools, or attending parent teacher conferences (Jeynes, 2010). These measurements are often based on generalized conceptions that do not account for culturally distinct parenting techniques (see El Nokali, Bachman, & Votruba-Drazl, 2010; Izzo, Weissberg, Kasprow, & Fendrich, 1999). For instance, Black parents may deliberately employ unique behaviors that seek to promote their children’s academic outcomes (Neblett, Chavous, Nguyen, & Sellers, 2009). Unfortunately, culturally distinct behaviors of Black parents are not represented in the current parental involvement literature. As a result, the current literature may suggest that Black parents are less involved in their children’s academic lives that they actually are. In light of this possibility, the purpose of this review is to shed insight into a more culturally sensitive conceptualization of parental involvement by furthering our understanding of how Black parents may seek to promote their children’s academic achievement. Of course, in order to understand parental involvement within the Black community, it is important to understand how experiences with racism can impair the academic achievement of Black students.
Racially Influenced Hindrances of Academic Achievement
Racism – defined as “the beliefs, attitudes, institutional arrangements, and acts that tend to denigrate individuals or groups because of phenotypic characteristics or ethnic group affiliation” (Clark, Anderson, Clark, Williams, 1999, p. 805) – is commonly experienced by the Black community (Greene, Way, & Pahl, 2006; Seaton, Caldwell, Sellers, & Jackson, 2008). Acts of racial discrimination can take the form of either major events (e.g., being denied a bank loan, being fired because of membership in a racial group) or day-to-day events (e.g., being treated with less courtesy than others, being called names because of membership in a racial group) (Soto, Dawson-Andoh, & BeLue, 2010). Research suggests that individuals who experiences acts of racial discrimination are more likely to experience lower self-esteem and higher rates of depression and behavior problems (Cunningham, Swanson, Spencer, & Dupree, 2003; Neblett, Philip, Nguyen, & Sellers, 2008), which in turn are all negatively related to academic achievement (Ceballo, Dahl, Aretakis, & Ramirez, 2001; Lackeye & Margalit, 2006).
Another salient form of racial discrimination experienced by Black students is racially biased teacher expectations. Specifically, recent research suggests that teachers often hold lower academic expectations and provide poorer quality instruction to Black students than they do to White students, thus providing Black children with fewer resources to learn from (Bakker, Denessen, & Brus-Laeven, 2007; McKown & Weinstein, 2008). Black students may then internalize the low expectations of their teachers, leading them to experience lower self-esteem (McKown & Weinstein, 2008). As a result of this, Black students may become motivated to achieve according to the perceived low expectations of their teachers, which can result in decreased academic performance (Steele, 1997; Weinstein & Middlestadt, 1979).
Racially biased teacher expectations are also related to enhanced depression in Blacks (Odom & Vernon-Feagans, 2010). Depressed students are less likely to be behaviorally or emotionally engaged in academic activities, which has negative implications for academic performance (Eccles & Roeser, 2009). Furthermore, children who frequently experience racial biases can develop aggressive or anxious personalities (Copeland-Linder, Lambert, Chen, & Ialongo, 2011), which in turn lower the already low expectations teachers may have for Black students, as teachers are more likely to hold low expectations for children they find difficult to manage (Hinnant, O’Brien, & Ghazarian, 2009; McKown &Weinstein, 2008). In sum, racially biased teacher expectations catalyze various behaviors in Black students which then further lower teacher expectations, resulting in a vicious cycle of discrimination. With these facts in mind, it is no wonder that a large body of literature relates low teacher expectations with poor academic achievement (Hinnant et al., 2009; McKown &Weinstein, 2008). Of course, in addition to Black students’ efforts to combat the negative influence of racially biased teacher expectations, they must also often struggle to remain resilient to the effects of stereotypes.
Social stereotypes in the U.S. often place Blacks in a negative light relative to members of other racial groups (Chavous, Harris, Rivas, Helaire, & Green, 2004). Some common stereotypes about Blacks are that they are more likely to steal from others, act aggressively, or under perform academically (Beyer, Loeber, Wilkstrom, & Stouthamer-Loeber, 2001; Pauker, Ambady, & Apfelbaum, 2010). Research suggests that stereotypes about an individual’s intellectual ability are likely to have an especially negative influence on academic achievement (Steele & Aronson, 1995). Specifically, Steele and Aronson (1995) posited that the mere thought of a negative stereotype about one’s social group has the influence to lower the academic performance of individuals belonging to that group.
To test the stereotype theory, Steele and Aronson (1995) recruited college students to complete a test composed of items from the Graduate Record Exam. In the experimental condition, Black participants were exposed to an evaluative component (i.e., they were told that the test diagnosed intellectual ability). Students in the control condition received no such messages. Results of this study revealed that Black students in the experimental condition performed significantly lower than Black students in the control condition, suggesting that being exposed to an evaluative component negatively influenced students’ academic performance. Steele and Aronson (1995) posit that the presence of the evaluative component may have activated awareness of negative stereotypes (e.g., that Blacks are more likely to underperform academically), which may have led to anxiety within the students. Support for this relation is evidenced by the fact that after the experiment, participants were asked to complete word fragments and Black students who were in the experimental group were most likely to use words associated with negative stereotypes (e.g., __mb was filled as “dumb” instead of “numb”). This phenomenon is now understood as stereotype threat (Steele & Aronson, 1995; Aronson & Steele, 2005), and has been empirically validated in multiple studies (e.g., Fischer & Massey, 2007; McKay, Doverspike, & Bowen-Hilton, 2003).
By examining some of the negative experiences of Black students within academic settings, research shows that there are various ways in which race is related to academic achievement. Therefore, parental involvement in the Black community might involve acts that are aimed specifically towards racial issues (Cooper & Smalls, 2010). However, there exists a preponderance of studies that do not consider race in their conceptualization of parental involvement. As a result of this, parental involvement in the Black community may not be accurately represented in the current literature. It is therefore crucial that researchers reconceptualize parental involvement in order to accurately capture, and moreover, understand, parental involvement in the Black community. In doing so, researchers may develop the knowledge needed to create culturally inclusive parental involvement measures, and more importantly, may be able to measure parental involvement accurately and effectively within Black samples.
Becoming Culturally Inclusive
In the past two decades, a more thorough conceptualization of parental involvement has emerged beyond the school-based concept (e.g., volunteering in schools, serving on school committees) to include a variety of motivated beliefs and behaviors that can occur in the home, community, or school setting (e.g., helping children with homework, visiting libraries and museums, speaking with other parents and school administrators, believing in a child’s ability) (Epstein, 1995; Fan & Williams, 2010; Grolnick & Slowiaczek, 1994; Hoover-Dempsey & Sandler, 1995; Jeynes, 2010). Although this multidimensional conception of parental involvement is important, it may not accurately capture culturally distinct aspects of parental involvement (Cooper & Smalls, 2010; Manz et al. 2004). Therefore, the current conceptualization of parental involvement may continue to evolve by examining alternative ways in which minority parents, Black parents in particular, seek to ameliorate their children’s academic well-achievement.
Research shows that children who receive certain types of racial socialization messages from their parents benefit academically (Neblett et al., 2008). More specifically, when parents emphasize enhancing their child’s self-worth (e.g., telling their children they are special no matter what anyone says), and express egalitarian messages (e.g., messages regarding racial equality and coexistence), their children are more likely to experience higher levels of academic curiosity and persist more on difficult school tasks (Neblett, Philip, Cogburn, & Sellers, 2006; Neblett et al., 2009). Neblett et al. (2006) speculates that this might be because self-worth and egalitarian messages enable Black children to feel safe and equally entitled to explore academia and apply themselves in the classroom, even in the presence of messages that suggest otherwise. This has important implications, as it suggests that self-worth and egalitarian messages may buffer the negative effects biased teacher expectations have on academic achievement. In addition, when parents socialize their children to develop knowledge about Black history and traditions, in-group orientations, and racial pride, children develop the necessary tools and characteristics to counteract racist experiences (Chavous, Rivas-Drake, Smalls, Griffin, & Cogburn, 2008; Hughes, Witherspoon, Rivas-Drake, West-Bey, 2009; Neblett et al. 2006; Neblett et al. 2009). Furthermore, specific types of racial socialization may be able to buffer the negative effects of stereotype threat (e.g., decreased academic engagement, decreased motivation) (Steele, 1997). Taken together, it is clear that there are many ways in which Black parents can utilize racial socialization messages to positively impact the academic performance of their children; however, not all forms of racial socialization lead to positive outcomes.
Research suggests that aspects of racial socialization that prepare children to experience discrimination are negatively associated with self-esteem, ethnic identity, positive behavioral outcomes, and academic well-being (Hughes et al., 2009). At first glance, it is plausible to consider that raising awareness of racial inequities and potential encounters with discrimination may serve as a protective factor. However, being overly attuned to biases may have deleterious effects on Black students. For instance, when children frequently receive messages that prepare them for experiences with discrimination, such as low expectations, children may internalize these messages and become motivated to perform in ways that are academically and behaviorally consistent with the low expectations that others have of them (McKown & Weinstein, 2008; Steele, 1997; Steele & Aronson, 1995; Weinstein & Middlestadt, 1979).
In light of the potentially positive and negative influences nuances aspects of racial socialization may have on Black students, Neblett et al. (2009) suggests that simultaneously expressing messages about possible negative outcomes Black people commonly experience (i.e., preparation for bias, racial barrier messages), emphasizing pride in Black history and culture (i.e., racial pride messages), affirming Black children’s personal and racial group identities (i.e., self-worth messages), and stressing the importance of positive relations with other racial groups (i.e., egalitarian messages) may be an optimal form of racial socialization. In other words, teaching children about the harmful effects of discrimination and stereotypes, while simultaneously emphasizing the child’s cultural background, self-worth, and equality among all people, may socialize Black children to become resilient to the negative effects of discrimination and stereotypes. In sum, racial socialization looks like a promising type of involvement that Black parents may engage in to enhance their child’s academic achievement. However, with 39% of Black families in the U.S. living below the poverty threshold, (U.S. Census Bureau, 2010), economically disadvantaged Black parents must often work to combat the negative aspects of poverty.
Combating the effects of socioeconomic status
A disproportionate amount of Black children live in economically disadvantaged single parent households, and have parents with low levels of education and employment status (Castro et al., 2004). These negative aspects of poverty often hinder parents’ ability to be involved in their children’s schooling. For instance, parents with lower education levels may feel less competent to engage with professionals in the school context (Johnson, 2010; Manz, Fantuzzo, & Power, 2004). Furthermore, single parents may not have the time to be actively involved in their child’s school (Manz et al., 2004). In light of these unfortunate circumstances, previous research suggests that Black parents from economically disadvantaged contexts may focus on dimensions of parental involvement that do not depend heavily on school contact (Dauber & Epstein, 1993).
In a recent investigation, Jeynes (2010) highlights more subtle aspects of parental involvement, which may be the most powerful predictors of children’s academic achievement. Subtle types of parental involvement include believing in a child’s ability, communicating with a child about academia, and holding high expectations for a child’s academic achievement (Jeynes, 2010). Holding high educational expectations for Black children is particularly important, since just as these children are able to internalize the discriminatory expectations of their surroundings, they are able to internalize the positive and potentially uplifting expectations of their parents (Bandura & Walters, 1963; Jeynes, 2010; McKown & Weinstein, 2008). As a result, children whose parents expect them to achieve highly may adapt the qualities and beliefs of their parents, resulting in an increased feeling of competence and academic achievement (Bandura, 1995; Fan & Williams, 2010; Jeynes, 2010). Therefore, when measuring parental involvement within economically disadvantaged populations, it is important to acknowledge that parents with limited resources can still strengthen and support their children’s academic achievement through more subtle aspects of parental involvement (Jeynes, 2010).
Conclusion and Implications for Future Direction
Black children are often exposed to multiple contextual hindrances that impair their academic achievement. In response to these hindrances, Black parents may become involved in a culturally distinct manner that aims to serve as a protective factor. The current conceptualization of parental involvement does not capture culturally distinct behaviors, which is a methodological shortcoming that needs to be addressed. More specifically, when examining parental involvement within Black populations, researchers should seek to identify the presence of racial socialization and more subtle aspects of parental involvement. By working towards a more culturally sensitive approach to measuring parental involvement, researchers may be able to determine nuanced aspects of parental involvement that may be more relevant to Black students. Potential findings can catalyze policy makers and schools to implement educational initiatives that inform Black parents about the contextual hindrances their children face, and of ways in which they can become involved to combat those hindrances. These policies and interventions would undoubtedly be an important contribution to the ongoing effort of reducing racial educational disparities in the U.S.
References
Aronson, J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Stereotypes and the fragility of academic competence, motivation, and self-concept. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of Competence and Motivation (pp. 436–456). New York: Guilford Publications.
Bakker, J., Denessen, E., & Brus-Laeven, M. (2007). Socio-economic background, parental involvement and teacher perceptions of these in relation to pupil achievement. Educational Studies, 33(2), 177-192. doi:10.1080/03055690601068345
Bandura, A. (1995). Self-efficacy and educational development. In A. Bandura (Ed.), Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies (pp. 202-231). United States of America: Cambridge University Press.
Bandura, A., & Walters, R. H. (1963). Social learning and personality development. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
Beyer, J. M., Loeber, R., Wikstrom, P. H., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2001). What predicts adolescent violence in better-off neighborhoods? Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 29, 369-381. doi:10.1023/A:1010491218273
Ceballo, R., Dahl, T. A., Aretakis, M. T., & Ramirez, C. (2001). Inner-city children’s exposure to community violence: How much do parents know? Journal of Marriage and the Family, 63, 927-940. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2001.00927.x
Chavous, T. M., Harris, A., Rivas, D., Helaire, L., & Green, L. (2004). Racial stereotypes and gender in context: An examination of African American college student adjustment. Sex Roles, 51, 1–16. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000032305.48347.6d
Chavous, T. M., Rivas-Drake, D., Smalls, C., Griffin, T., & Cogburn, C. (2008). Gender matters too: The influences of school racial discrimination and racial identity on academic engagement outcomes among African American adolescents. Developmental Psychology, 44, 637-654. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.44.3.637
Castro, D. C., Bryant, D. M., Peisner-Feinberg, E. S., & Skinner, M. L. (2004). Parent involvement in Head Start programs: The role of parent, teacher, and classroom characteristics. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19, 413–430. doi:10.1016/j.ecresq.2004.07.005
Clark, R., Anderson, N. B., Clark, V. R., & Williams, D. R. (1999). Racism as a stressor for African Americans: A biopsychosocial model. American Psychologist, 54, 805–816. doi: Volume II Fall 2011 10.1037/0003-066X.54.10.805
Copeland-Linder, N., Lamber, S., Chen, Y., & Ialongo, N. (2011). Contextual stress and health risk behaviors among African American adolescents. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 40(2), 158-173. doi:10.1007/s10964-010-9520-y
Cooper, S. M., & Smalls, C. (2010). Culturally distinctive and academic socialization: Direct and interactive relationships with African American adolescents’ academic adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 39, 199- 212. doi:10.1007/s10964-009-9404-1
Cunningham, M., Swanson, D. P., Spencer, M. B., & Dupree, D. (2003). The association of physical maturation with family hassles among African American adolescent males. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 9, 276-288. doi:10.1037/1099-9809.9.3.276
Dauber, S. L., & Epstein, J. L. (1993). Parent’s attitudes and practices of involvement in inner-city elementary and middle schools. In N. Chavkin (Ed.), Families and schools in a pluralistic society (pp. 53-72). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
Eccles, J. S., & Roeser, R. W. (2009). Schools, academic motivation, and stage–environment fit. In R. M. Lerner & L. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (3rd ed., pp. 404 – 434). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
El Nokali, N. E., Bachman, H. J., & Votruba-Drazl, E. (2010). Parent involvement and children’s academic and social development in elementary school. Child Development, 8, 988-1005. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01447.x
Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. In. J. Epstein (Ed.), School/Family/Community Partnerships: Preparing Educators and Preparing Schools (pp. 389-414). Colorado: Westview Press.
Fan, W., & Williams, C. M. (2010). The effects of parental involvement on students’ academic self-efficacy, engagement and intrinsic motivation. Educational Psychology, 30, 53-74. doi:10.1080/01443410903353302
Fischer, M. J., & Massey, D. S. (2007). The effects of affirmative action in higher education. Social Science Research, 36, 531-549. doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2006.04.004
Greene, M. L., Way, N., & Pahl, K. (2006). Trajectories of perceived adult and peer discrimination among Black, Latino, and Asian American adolescents: Patterns and psychological correlates. Developmental Psychology, 42, 218-238. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.2.218
Grolnick, W. S., & Slowiaczek, M. L. (1994). Parents’ involvement in children’s schooling: A multidimensional conceptualization and motivational model. Child Development, 65, 237-252. doi:10.2307/1131378
Hinnant, J., O’Brien, M., & Ghazarian, S. (2009). The longitudinal relations of teacher expectations to achievement in the early school years. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 662-670. doi:10.1037/a0014306
Hoover-Dempsey, K. V., & Sandler, H. M. (1995). Parental involvement in children’s education: Why does it make a difference. Teachers College Record, 97(2), 310-331.
Hughes, D., Witherspoon, D., Rivas-Drake, D., & West-Bey, N. (2009). Received ethnic-racial socialization messages and youths’ academic and behavioral outcomes: Examining the mediating role of ethnic identity and self- esteem. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 15, 112-124. doi:10.1037/a0015509
Izzo, C. V., Weissberg, R. P., Kasprow, W. J., & Fendrich, M. (1999). A longitudinal assessment of teacher perceptions of parental involvement in children’s education and school performance. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 817-839. doi:10.1023/A:1022262625984
Jeynes, W. H. (2010). Parental involvement and encouraging that involvement: Implications for school-based programs. Teachers College Record, 112(3), 747-774.
Johnson, O. Jr. (2010). Assessing neighborhood racial segregation and macroeconomic effects in the education of African Americans. Review of Educational Research, 80(4), 527-575. doi:10.3102/0034654310377210
Lackaye, T.G., Margalit, M. (2006). Comparisons of achievement, effort, and self-perceptions among students with learning disabilities and their peers from different achievement Groups. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 432-446. doi:10.1177/00222194060390050501
Manz, P. H., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Power, T. J. (2004). Multidimensional assessment of family involvement among urban elementary students. Journal of School Psychology, 42, 461-475. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2004.08.002
McKay, P. F., Doverspike, D., & Bowen-Hilton, D. (2003). The effects of demographic variables and stereotype threat on Black/White differences in cognitive ability test performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 18, 1–14. doi:10.1023/A:1025062703113
McKown, C., & Weinstein, R. (2008). Teacher expectations, classroom context, and the achievement gap. Journal of School Psychology, 46, 235-261. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.05.001
Neblett, E. W., Chavous, T. M., Nguyen, H. X., & Sellers, R. M. (2009). “Say It Loud – I’m Black and I’m Proud”: Parents’ messages about race, racial discrimination, and academic achievement in African American boys. The Journal of Negro Education, 78(3), 246-259.
Neblett, E. W., Philip, C. L., Cogburn, C. D., & Sellers, R. M. (2006). African American adolescents’ discrimination experiences and academic achievement: Racial socialization as a cultural compensatory and protective factor. The Journal of Black Psychology, 32, 199-218. doi:10.1177/0095798406287072
Neblett, E. W., White, R. L., Ford, K. R., Philip, C. L., Nguyen, H. X., & Sellers, R. M. (2008). Patterns of racial socialization and psychological adjustment: Can parental communications about race reduce the impact of racial discrimination? Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 18, 477-515. doi:10.1111/j.1532-7795.2008.00568.x
Noguera, P. (2003). City schools and the American Dream. New York and London: Teachers College, Columbia University.
Odom, E., & Vernon-Feagans, L. (2010). Buffers of racial discrimination: Links with depression
among rural African mothers. Journal of Marriage and Family, (72), 346-359. doi:10.1111/j.1741-3737.2010.00704.x
Pauker, K., Ambady, N. & Apfelbaum, E. P. (2010). Race salience and essentialist thinking in racial stereotype development. Child Development, 81, 1799-1813. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01511.x
Seaton, E. K., Caldwell, C. H., Sellers, R. M., & Jackson, J. S. (2008). The prevalence of perceived discrimination among African American and Caribbean Black Youth. Developmental Psychology, 44, 1288-1297. doi:10.1037/a0012747
Soto, J. A., Dawson-Andoh, N. A., & BeLue, R. (2010). The relationship between perceived discrimination and generalized anxiety disorder among Blacks, Afro Caribbeans, and non-Hispanic Whites. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 25, 258-265. doi:10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.09.011
Steele, C. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52, 613-29. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.52.6.613
Steele, C., & Aronson, J. (1998). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797-811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797
U.S. Census Bureau. Current Population Reports, Income, Poverty, and Health Insurance Coverage in the United States: 2010, P60-239, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.
Weinstein, R. S., & Middlestadt, S. E. (1979). Student perceptions of teacher interactions with male high and low achievers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(4), 421−431. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.71.4.421
Author’s Biography
Steven O. Roberts is a senior in the Applied Psychology program. His main research interests include the contextual factors that hinder or promote the academic development of economically disadvantaged youth. After graduating, he intends to pursue a graduate degree in the field of psychology.