On page 9 in Track Changes you say that with electronic word processing one can “always change the text today instead of tomorrow.” Why is this exclusive to electronic processing? It is unclear to me why this point is about the relationship between writing and word processing and not just a point about procrastination on a general level.

In terms of George R.R. Martin’s (among others’) unwillingness to change the way they write to newer forms, is this always to make sure the writing is in its purest form, or can the writing benefit from changing the formula and allowing access to maybe different ideas? Can maintaining the same tool cause a rut?

Are the ideas of tacit knowledge and materiality inherently linked, or is tacit knowledge more based in physicality?