Author Archives: Charley Cohen

A Letter from the Editor – Charley Cohen

To readers new and old,

How to summarize a year of success, growth, expectations and the experience of leading the Wagner Planner is nearly impossible to put into words on a page, but I will try my best. After succeeding Mayelly Moreno last Spring, I had two goals I wanted to accomplish. The first was to continue the success in establishing the Planner’s presence back within NYU and NYU Wagner and the urban planning community. The second was to expand the mission of the Planner by bringing on more talented writers, new mediums of content, and long-form articles. We did all of that: doubling the writing staff, launched the new Wagner Planner Podcast, and several writers wrote three-part pieces on topics related to cities, housing, and social movements. I am incredibly proud of what we have accomplished together this year and what will grow from our success.

Truly, my favorite aspect of this role was getting to work with the staff writers and seeing their ideas grow into their articles and mediums, and also getting to learn about new topics from their pieces. As someone with a focus on transportation, my knowledge on topics regarding housing, sanitation, and other topics was much more limited. Getting to read and understand the many topics covered this year helped me not only be a better editor, but a better planner. This is one of the beauties of the Urban Planning program at NYU Wagner: our colleagues can be as good of teachers as our professors, opening our eyes to areas within planning that were not on the radar before. So, to all the staff: Aisha Balogun, Stephen Zubrycky, Patrick Spauster, Mackenna Caughron, Luke Walsh, Benjamin Listman, Winnie Shen, and Samantha Sánchez – thank you for all you have contributed and what you will contribute to the field.

I am incredibly excited for the upcoming year for the Wagner Planner with incoming Editor Patrick Spauster at the helm. Patrick, beyond his brilliant writing, is an expert in design, communication and content creation. He will be guiding the further expansion of the Planner to further mediums and new projects. I am excited to read along next year and continue to learn and grow as a Planner with you all.

This truly has been an experience and role of a lifetime, and I thank everyone who has read our pieces and engaged with us for their contributions and time. I will be writing in my spare time for sure, so please check me out on Twitter and LinkedIn and stay connected.

Stay Well,

Charley Cohen

Unconventional City Planners: Part 2 [Starbase, Texas]

In the Unconventional City Planners series, Mackenna Caughron will explore three unconventional planners and their machinations of the city. This is part 2 of a 3 part series.

I remember first seeing Robert Downey Jr. as Tony Stark in Iron Man. He was brash, confident, techno-intelligent, and liberal spender. The exemplar of “making it” with a specific American flair of “I say and I do what I want”.

Source: Mackenna Caughron

As headlines sour and the pressing issues of the day weigh on our minds, we look for a fanatical zealot to save us. Though not an Iron Man replica, we have a modern day rocketman in-training. Elon Musk, TIME’s 2021 Person of the Year, CEO, Chief Engineer, investor, prolific Tweeter, our savior (?), and city planner (???). Well, we’ll see.

Looking west on Esperson St in Boca Chica Village, Starbase visible in the background. GoogleMaps.

 

Hard to deny a certain resemblance… (Source – Here & Here

Where do our two male leads differ? Iron Man rescued our galaxy, Elon is looking to colonize it.

Elon Musk operates SpaceX, a private, for-profit company aiming to build reusable rockets to shuttle humans to Mars and other planets. Though Elon Musk’s multi-planetary plans are well-documented, it is a little town in Texas that we will be exploring today. Starbase, Texas – the launchpad for interstellar living.

Location of Starbase

Teetering on the edge of the United States sits SpaceX’s Starbase tracking station.

Google Map Location of Starbase, TX

Elon Musk announced his hunt for a commercial space launch site in 2011. He courted Georgia, Puerto Rico, and Florida, before ultimately choosing Texas after publicizing his $15M in financial incentives and meeting with the state’s governor.

The site benefits from the Earth’s west-to-east rotation. A “fat” location on Earth rotates at a higher velocity angular momentum push (similar to why Cape Canaveral, Florida is NASA’s launch HQ). 

The coastal location had an eclectic fan club. Allegedly once dubbed “the next Ft. Lauderdale”, the hurricane-prone settlement dwindled to 6 permanent residents, according to a Texas Ghost Town feature dated 2008. The town, officially named Boca Chica Village, still has non-potable water trucked in and lackluster cell reception, but that did not bother long-time residents.

Looking west on Esperson St in Boca Chica Village, Starbase visible in the background. GoogleMaps.

The area is quaint. Single-story homes dot the perimeter of the $100M launch facility. The only restaurant in town “The Prancing Pony Bar and Grill” exclusively serves SpaceX employees (the restaurant lacks any online presence albeit Google user uploaded photos). 

Inside the Prancing Pony Bar & Grill, you can find the “Occupy Mars” sign, publicized thanks to Google users.

This is the site of the Prancing Pony Bar & Grill. Google Maps captured this area in April 2011, far before development began. It is fitting that a lonely “for sale” dots the foreground, a sign of things to come. Google Maps.

Brownsville is the nearest city. A 30-minute drive west on the Mexican border, Brownsville suffers from America’s highest urban poverty levels (34% in 2013), experienced by a dominant Hispanic population (88% In 2013). 

Elon Musk sees this sleepy rural zone with nearby impoverished populations and sees our gateway to salvation. 

Urban Experience

Elon Musk has not contracted a questionably named consulting company ala Akon City, however, we can analyze his historical actions and early perspective in interviews.

Starbase, Texas will send individuals to the moon, Mars, and beyond.

What kind of people would one meet? Residents may work for SpaceX (or supporting businesses). Tourists who time their visits to catch a launch. Ticket-carrying customers preparing to depart to worlds beyond, maybe grabbing the last of their favorite Earthly items (Avocados? Sneakers?) taking flight. The rhythm of the city gravitates around the launch schedule. Its economy depends on it.

Like the surrounding neighborhoods of a traditional airport, the port of Starbase will house employees (and their exclusive Lord of the Rings-hinting restaurant), interstellar tourists, space enthusiasts, and residents.

 Currently, facilities are relegated into the manufacturing, testing, and launching of Super Heavy and Starship prototypes. Inherent risk – and fanfare – is possible within the operations of the city, akin to living near an industrial zone.

 Starbase planners may look to Cape Canaveral, NASA’s home to the Kennedy Space Center for inspiration. With a handful of launches each month, Cape Canaveral acts as a space-themed amusement park. Neighboring Disneyworld, the Florida city’s main draw is the NASA’s Kennedy Space Center and rocket launch viewing areas (Sorry, Manatee protection areas, your days are numbered).

Major intersection in Cape Canaveral, Google Maps. 

Florida’s “space coast” offers some lessons. It has a wide variety of civic initiatives including a community-led re-visioning project, sustainability and resilience initiatives, parks, and beaches. Elon Musk would lose valuable funding if he foregoes a tourist-leaning, revenue generating example

The Las Vegas Convention Loop system is designed for 4,400 passengers per hour [Source].

Elon Musk may deploy other companies he’s spun up to address city stressors. His cheekily named “The Boring Company” pilots subterranean tunnels for freight, transport, and utility. Musk may leverage Tesla and TBC’s capabilities to construct a hyperloop.

Traveling through the city, you’ll see Elon Musk’s inner engineer fingerprinted within the city’s logistics and operations. In a manner less showy than Akon City, the city’s father will calibrate his vision of an efficient, low waste hub.

Purpose

Why travel to Starbase? Well, it’s all in the name. A base for the stars. Thoroughfare to galaxies far, far away. But also a testing ground where technology is (explosively – at times) being developed.

It raises interesting questions how the city should be structured, for humans flourishing or scientific experimentation, and whether both needs can be met harmoniously. 

Challenges

It’s clear current Boca Chica Village residents are not part of the plan. SpaceX offered their “best and final” to the small group of existing homeowners that had not yet sold their homes to the ambitious company. When the homeowners resisted, the company suggested the use of “alternate approaches” to obtain the land. It is unlikely that county or state governance would take issue with the seizure tactics. Musk specifically has been shifting businesses to Texas due to an alignment toward a more lenient approach to governance (more on that in a bit).

 And it makes sense. Airports as they exist today do not conduct high quality of life. Studies have shown deteriorating health caused by increased noise and pollution exposure. Starbase already expects residents to evacuate the launch area, pushing people from their homes and inciting local ire. A rocket with the name of Superheavy is not likely to be light on the ears, despite achieving some pollution benefits through Musk’s design objective of reusability.

 Even the closest success case of Cape Canaveral may be tough to replicate. The Florida space coast has a population of dominantly white, older homeowners (93.8% white non-Hispanic, 35.8% older than 65, 10% poverty rate).

 In contrast, Brownsville, the closest urban center to Starbase, is 18 times more populous, skewing younger with higher levels of poverty. In a certain and sad realization, their lives may be easier to “re-engineer” given traditional economic and social power dynamics. Shifting the economics toward amusement or science may disrupt or displace these lives. For those who have already spoken up, the response is quick.

What do we take away?

Elon has spoken to the fatality of Earth. He doesn’t see the longevity in Earth being a forever-sustaining home for our species. To save humanity, we have to build transport vehicles that will take us to other, more suitable homes.

 It’s an admirable cause – to save the human race. Not dissimilar to Tony Stark’s Iron Man, looking to rid the planet of evil aliens, bent on destruction. Though, Musk sees our planet’s destruction as inevitable, and thus – perhaps not salvageable.

 In traveling to our next planet, he’s also discussed an entire new form of organization. He’s recommended reshaping the government, perhaps a direct democracy with laws simple enough to avoid coercion of powerful stakeholders. Radical transparency, with a well-informed populace, and fewer rules and regulations (we can see why Texas again is so appealing).

 And for an individual hell-bent on reusing materials, he’s ready to find a brand-new foundation for life.

 Similar to Akon, we see Elon’s perspective of the future shaped in his city. Whereas Akon emphasizes the visuals in an attempt to form ultra-luxe Cosmopolitan African Wakanda; Elon values the processes and experimentation of those processes. They both see blank slates as valuable, open canvases for their imagination. The danger in that? When we are planning so far for our future generations, we forget the 186,000 people that currently live in Brownsville.

The Infrastructure of Safety – Pricing our Protection

Art Concept of NYC Subway with Platform Screen Doors (Source: NBC News)

There is no comfort that the death of Michelle Alyssa Go, age 40, is a policy failure of the highest magnitude. On January 15th, 2022, Ms. Go was pushed onto the tracks of the Brooklyn-bound R Subway as the train was pulling into Times Square; she was pronounced dead-on-scene. Her alleged assailant has reportedly had a history of over two decades of assault; in 2019, he was declared mentally unfit to stand trial for a drug possession charge, according to prosecutors. Newly elected Mayor Eric Adams, a former NYCT Transit Police Officer, visited the station that afternoon, stating that he and Governor Kathy Hochul would be working on getting more officers and mental health experts in Subway stations. But Ms. Go’s death is not just about mental health, crime in subway stations, or policing: her death is a glaring reminder that the MTA and elected officials must incorporate safety infrastructure measures, such as Platform Screen Doors (PSDs), in design and construction, so New York City can combat these  unnecessarily tragic events. 

According to The City, there were 169 reported incidents of trains hitting people in 2020, of which 63 were fatal. This is compared to the 62 fatal occurrences in 2019, when ridership was much higher. This increase could be related to the mental health issues stemming from the Pandemic. These types of incidents further demonstrate infrastructure that perhaps a police officer or counselor cannot provide: instant, real-time prevention. Just by having barriers up, by having something that physically stops an action from being taken, there would be little-to-no need for human intervention. With major staffing issues because of the Omicron variant, we do not know if and how someone could have prevented what occurred that Saturday morning. We do know that six officers covering all of the Times Square station is insufficient, and that the surest protection against an accidental or purposeful fall onto the subway tracks is a physical barrier. 

People Waiting to Board (Source: New Scientist)

So, if the solution is platform screen doors, why hasn’t the problem been solved? Like most transit issues: follow the money. While the AirTrain that connects the MTA to JFK does have PSDs, none of the 472 Subway Stations have any form of protection. In a press meeting after Ms. Guo’s death, MTA Acting Chair Janno Lieber stated that “platform doors are an idea that works in many places, but there are special complexities in New York… That said, we’re always looking for ways that we can make the system safer.” New York exceptionalism is no excuse for the lack of safety measures in place, but it does bring up some of the major challenges of installing PSDs in an older subway system. In 2017, the MTA commissioned a report by consulting firm STV, which resulted in a 3,000 page paper on the difficulty  of installing PSDs. Some of the highlights of the report include:

  • Roughly 33% (or 154 of the 472) of stations are too narrow to both accommodate wheelchairs and the machinery needed for screen doors.
  • Because of the age of many of the underground stations, the support columns on the platforms would not leave room for screen doors. 
  • Different lines and different track gauges make uniformity impossible: while certain stations on the A/C could have doors (costing $30M per station), many stops along the L line could not have protection.  

JFK AirTrain – Howard Beach Station Platform, showing PSDs (Source: WikiMedia)

  According to Bay Area Rapid Transit, there are no US subway systems that currently use PSDs or any form of screen protection. So, are the issues that Americans have a warped measurement of danger and lackluster governing tools? Perhaps, these tragedies are not frequent enough to raise the capital, despite one death being one too many. These are grim outlooks, but there are global solutions that US systems could adopt to mitigate this problem. For example, in Japan, a 2011 law was passed that any station that has over 100,000 daily riders must have some sort of form of protection from the tracks. One solution, from the West Japan Railway Company (further explained here) are 10-meter long metal wires that lower and rise when trains are pulling into the station, and use QR scanning technology to operate. A full video of these fences and wires can be seen here. As the full report states, by 2015, over 90% of riders felt more safe. There are several other types of PSDs that are used around the world, from newer systems in Brazil, to the older systems in London and Paris, which the Washington Post summarizes in detail. As systems and nations solutions, the US risks appearing lethargic and dispassionate on rider safety. 

Image Capture of the Automatic System Platform Gate in Japan (Source: Dotaku, YouTube)

What will it finally take for New York City to end the needless deaths and accidents caused by falling onto the train tracks? Will it be an increase in events, as Mayor Michael Bloomberg stated in 2013? Will it be about finding solutions that maintain  ADA-accessibility, even though PSDs would deliver dire protection when compared with  guidance bumps on the gaps for the blind? Will it be political pressure that elected officials may fall upon, not appointed MTA employees? There are other benefits to PSDs, such as the reduction of litter on tracks which cause both delays and air pollution. But for an agency that stresses the importance of safety for riders and operators, inaction against  this epidemic is an institutional and policy failure which the MTA must correct immediately and without hesitation. 

The Path to Secure Bike Parking in NYC

by: Ben Listman

Oonee Mini at Grand Central

This October, Metro-North Railroad announced a pilot for secure bike parking at Grand Central with Oonee. Oonee is a Brooklyn-based company that implements and operates secure bike parking structures. Oonee has grown relevant in New York City because of the increasingly evident need for a secure bike parking network, particularly in the wake of a ridership and bike theft increase during the COVID-19 pandemic. Oonee also recently announced a partnership with Jersey City to install the country’s first municipal secure bike parking system. Looking at the state of secure bike parking in New York, and examining Oonee and Jersey City’s agreement can help paint a picture of an expanded partnership between Oonee and the MTA.

Cycling has increased in popularity as a way to get around New York City, particularly during the pandemic. However, the city lacks the secure bike parking needed for such an increase in volume. Bike theft is pervasive in the city, with about one quarter of households experiencing bike theft. Theft increased during the pandemic by twenty seven percent; as close to 4,500 bikes were reported stolen between March and September of 2020. The same time period from 2019 shows about 3,500 reported bike thefts. Concern around bike theft is central to bike commuting patterns, and has appeared in New York City studies going back almost fifteen years. A city survey published in 2007 shows a lack of secure bike parking as a serious impediment to willingness to use bikes for transportation. This issue disproportionately affects immigrants, low income communities and communities of color, who, according to a 2013 report, are more likely to travel by bike and more likely to forgo riding in the absence of secure bike parking. Secure bike parking around the city could help to increase ridership and make the city safer, more sustainable, and more liveable. Oonee began implementing solutions to this problem with the launch of its first location in Lower Manhattan in October of 2018

Oonee’s goal is to create networks of free, easy to use, secure parking facilities for bikes and scooters. Their parking structure models range from large pods with room for at least twenty bikes to smaller pods the size of a parking space with room for ten bikes. Key cards or an app unlock the pods, and there are security cameras inside larger pods. The larger pods can also include placemaking features like benches or plants on the outside. Oonee’s basic business model is to lease space to install a pod, and generate revenue by charging advertisers to use the space available on the outside of the pod. 

Oonee at Journal Square

Oonee’s first location shuttered in 2019 because they were unable to generate revenue due to inhibitive DOT guidelines. They went on to partner with the Port Authority and a Brooklyn landowner, siting pods at Journal Square in Jersey City, and Atlantic Terminal respectively. More recently, Oonee has expanded their operation and created new pod designs. They have partnered with developers in Brooklyn and Queens to create publicly accessible parking spaces inside new buildings. They are also adding three new locations on Port Authority property in New York and New Jersey. Most notably, they will begin implementation of a secure bike parking network in Jersey City with thirty locations. Oonee also announced a partnership with Brightline, a Florida rail company, and have formed exploratory partnerships with Los Angeles, Miami, Philadelphia, and Detroit. Oonee and Metro-North Railroad’s partnership is the most recently announced pilot, and will be installed outside Grand Central on 43rd Street and Vanderbilt Avenue.

New Pod Design

Oonee approached the MTA to request the use of their space for the Grand Central pilot, and was granted a year-long license. The pilot agreement is simple and brief, leaving few details to analyze regarding cost, time frame, and other specifics. Oonee’s recent contract to develop Jersey City’s secure bike parking network acts as an example for what an agreement could look like with the MTA. Jersey City signed a five year contract with Oonee for thirty parking locations. The first seven locations will be installed in the first phase of the project, which will take around three months. Oonee’s proposal was evaluated based on a) experience, b) commitment to diversity, c) technical criteria including planning, maintenance, and service provision, and d) management criteria including financing, and implementation schedule. The contract costs the city nothing, and Oonee will pay the city five percent on all its advertising revenue after earning $2 million in initial revenue. In addition to avoiding capital investment and operating costs, the city will likely see indirect benefits in the form of increased ridership at transit centers, increased patronage at local businesses, and improved overall livability

Proposed Jersey City Phase One Locations

To help guide the development and expansion of their bike parking system, Oonee will create an advisory council made up of local community members. Advisory councils are a component they plan to include in all of their RFP responses and contracts. Their proposal also contains references from the Journal Square Restoration Corporation, Green City Solutions, Electric Avenue, Bike JC, and a number of Oonee users from Jersey City. These references show that Oonee has worked with the local business improvement district and bike advocacy groups, professionals knowledgeable in the field that support this project, and even locals that are willing to support them. Jersey City’s population is growing, and it is becoming increasingly popular with individuals and families wanting to live near New York City. Creating a liveable, bike friendly streetscape will go a long way in attracting new residents. Jersey City is not as dense as NYC, and has more open space to site pods which makes it a great proving ground for a truly secure bike parking network. 

A partnership with the  MTA to expand secure parking in NYC might be the best option when it comes to scarcity of open real estate on the street level. Oonee’s Atlantic Terminal location occupies a uniquely spacious sidewalk corner, but most sidewalks in New York City have nowhere near that amount of room. Many larger subway stations like Times Square and Atlantic Terminal have enough space inside to include pods for bike parking, but bringing bikes down into subway stations would still prove difficult. However, space does exist around larger commuter stations connected to subways like Jamaica Station in Queens. The MTA may also end up collaborating with the New York City DOT to help them find space near to subway entrances.  If they choose not to work with a private firm, the MTA also has the option to implement its own secure bike parking like the The Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority or Transport for London. However, creating and administering its own secure bike parking would be cost prohibitive for the MTA. Despite receiving nearly $11 billion from Biden’s infrastructure bill, the MTA still has a deficit it needs to address. Oonee has come to the MTA with a model that works, would cost them nothing, earn them revenue, and likely encourage ridership. Partnering with a company like Oonee that takes responsibility for operations and costs is what the MTA needs now. It would help to increase ridership without eating into existing budgetary priorities. 

Beginning with Grand Central, the pilot could conceivably expand to other high-traffic commuter train stations inside and outside the city. If the pilot is also adopted by New York City Transit (NYCT), the organization underneath the MTA responsible for subways and buses in the city, they could begin with high-traffic subway stations that generally have more room like Times Square, Grand Central, and 34 St-Herald Sq. The revenue sharing arrangement would likely be different than what Oonee has with Jersey City because Oonee would be using land owned by the MTA, as opposed to Jersey City helping Oonee work with local landowners. The MTA also already has advertising space and partnerships in the subways and on train platforms. OUTFRONT, the agency that handles the MTA’s advertising, would likely be able to integrate Oonee’s advertising space into its existing program. The MTA will likely demand a larger piece of revenue. Still, this partnership begins with Metro-North, and NYCT must choose to adopt Oonee as well. 

Adoption by NYCT might not be far off, though. If the Metro-North pilot is successful, Oonee would appear a logical partner for NYCT. Oonee also has strong local support in New York City, and this could help push NYCT to choose Oonee. Chief among Oonee’s supporters is the city’s incoming Mayor, Eric Adams. Adams made an appearance at Oonee’s unveiling of its Oonee Mini this November, speaking on the significance of secure bike parking in encouraging ridership, particularly in addressing transit equity. Oonee’s research shows that thirty percent of their users make below $50,000 a year, and more than haf identify as non-white. Given cycling’s rise in popularity during the pandemic, it became a central topic during the mayoral race, with many candidates supporting improvements to the city’s cycling network. Adams is a long-time supporter of Oonee, having also made an appearance at the unveiling of their Atlantic Terminal pod in 2019. Adams’ support for secure bike parking dovetails with his campaign’s interest in equitable transit systems. Oonee’s November unveiling also saw representatives from numerous local organizations, including those from Transportation Alternatives, StreetsPAC, Los Deliveristas Unidos, and Good Co. Bike Club. These organizations push for safe streets for residents and workers, represent food delivery workers, and connect minority communities to cycling. This political and community support puts Oonee in a position not only to win a contract with the MTA, but also to work with communities to create an effective network of bike parking infrastructure connecting New Yorkers to transit.

Having grown in popularity over the last few years, and now having gained mainstream acknowledgement from city politicians – the incoming Mayor no less – cycling infrastructure is bound to grow and improve in New York City. With the potential benefits of helping to increase ridership at transit centers, Oonee is well positioned to offer its services to the MTA, who desperately needs to increase ridership on their commuter trains, subways, and buses. Partnering with the MTA would give Oonee access to real estate all over the city, and with a variety of pod designs they could find ways to outfit most stations with a bike parking system. The MTA will not only be looking to learn from Metro-North’s pilot with Oonee this coming year, but will also be looking to Jersey City as an example of Oonee’s potential.