Rather, what is identified as bullying (particularly in our site of inquiry, schools) tends to be that which transgresses normative gendered behaviour as this ‘intersects’ with other identity markers like class and race […] In addition, we trace how being labelled as bullies and/or victims at school can position boys and girls in various ways as ‘gender deviants’. What we mean by the notion of gender deviant is that young people transgress expected and normative ideals of femininity and masculinity. (Ringrose, Reynolds 2010)
At first, I had a lot of trouble understanding what was meant by these sentences. My initial (mis)understanding was heavily based on a gendered understanding of bullying – when girls bully they do it like this and when boys bully, they do it like that. Because we seem to have clearly defined genders for bullying, the idea of bullying transgressing normative gender behavior seemed strange. What’s actually going on is that “normative gendered” behavior is defined NOT to include such behaviors as bullying. For example, the Heroic Masculine archetype, which is discussed in the article, does not include harming weaker males in a way that is deemed “unmerited” by the other students. To do so would not only constitute bullying behavior for the do-er, but also cause them to be a violator of this Heroic Masculine gender norm – a gender deviant. In the same ways, girls who engage in bulling behavior are deemed as violators of the idealized feminine archetype, who is “friends with everyone”, and therefore gender deviants.
It’s very interesting that gender roles are used to police/obscure bullying behavior among students. What can we do to change that?