“There is a popular misconception, especially among teachers, educational policy makers, and fellow (mainstream middle-class) parents that parents who are not a constant presence at the school—chaperoning field trips, attending PTA meetings, baking brownies for the bake sale—simply do not care about their children’s education.”
— Reconstructing Home and School, Fabienne Doucet, 2011
I strongly suspected the author’s idea at the first sight that the frequent absence of parents at school does not mean that parents do not care about their children’s education. I mean, if the parents do care about their children’s education, how is it possible that they rarely show up at school, communicate with the teacher, or participate in parental activities. We always say there are no busy parents but indifferent parents. However, professor Doucet showed me a totally new idea that one possible reason for the absence of parents at school is due to a purposeful resistance to Americanization and a protection for home terrain — the absence does not mean that they are indifferent to their children’s education at all.
It is clearly stated that building up a bridge between school and home may not been regarded as helpful by both teachers and parents. Despite what the initial reason is that parents resist to have a frequent link with the school, it’s better that teachers could bare in mind that they have to respect parents’ decision whether they want to largely participate in their children’s education or not. It is more important for teacher to know that there is no way they can get to the conclusion that a certain parent does not care about their children’s education just due to his or her absence at school. I have witnessed what bad result this idea could cause to this certain student who was regarded to have “indifferent parents”: the teacher unconsciously ignored the student and tended to not care about his homework, his academic performance, his small inappropriate behavior… I assume it is because that once the teacher got the conclusion that even the student’s parents do not care about him, there’s no need for her, as a teacher, to care about him. I admit that this teacher does not stand for all teachers, but still it will be helpful to not have this conclusion at the beginning.