All posts by Rita Sheridan

Confessions of a Teacher Turned Gamer

            True confession. I am technologically challenged. 1985 freshman year at NYU. Computer? Commodore 64. Whaaaattttttt…?! Yes. I’m old. There you have it y’all. I did not grow up with technology the way my own kids and students seem to have been born with iPhones attached to their hands, panic-stricken if their battery is in the red without an accessible charger or socket to refuel their addiction. Civilians without daily exposure to teens may balk with astonishment at the real-life melt-downs portrayed when a cell phone is taken away from a teen videotaped in CNN’s study on social media and teens, “#Being13: Inside the Secret World of Teens.” (2015) But this is not Kansas anymore Toto, you feel me frfr, this is some real shaaaaa…we as educators must deal with every day. So how do we navigate these tsunami waves of teen dissention to phone separation anxiety when negotiating the curriculum, classroom management, and frankly, our sanity as educators? “Embrace the rainbow” you skittle head my kids would tell me. So here I am.

                For the past two weeks I have laboriously interviewed my students, who were so psyched to school me on social media platforms for this paper: Instagram, Finsta, Snapchat, and World Star…Yikes! The teacher becomes the student and my students definitely felt the breadth of my frustration as this role reversal was quite enlightening for all involved. Bottomline? My kids were enthusiastic to teach me all about the idiosyncratic nuances of all of these platforms, but when I finally explained the why, that I needed to choose one to focus on with the goal of using it to promote more engaged, motivating curriculum development; they were just like, “Nah. That won’t work Miss.” (Insert bug-eyed emoji face here) Ok. Redirect.

                Chapter Two. My son has dyslexia and a processing disorder. He’s had an IEP since 3rd grade. He only has two social media platforms he engages, Snapchat and “Multiplayer online battle arena (MOBA), also known as action real-time strategy (ARTS), which is a subgenre of strategy video games that originated as a subgenre of real-time strategy, in which a player controls a single character in a team who compete versus another team of players. The objective is to destroy the opposing team’s main structure with the assistance of periodically-spawned computer-controlled units that march forward along set paths. Player characters typically have various abilities and advantages that improve over the course of a game and that contribute to a team’s overall strategy. MOBA games are a fusion of action gamesrole-playing games and real-time strategy games.” (Wikipedia) Sean is an athlete, was always an outdoor-playing kid, until last year, freshman year of high school. He suddenly wanted an Xbox and a Microsoft Live Subscription for Christmas. He literally was no longer part of the male-bonding social circle at school any longer if he did not participate in this platform. He needed to learn this at home to be part of the socialization at school. I have never seen/heard my son more engaged, motivated, excited, focused, and ultimately confident than I have when he is in MOBA world with his friends. So now I’ve been wracking my brain trying to figure out how I can incorporate video gaming, specifically MOBA, into my English classroom curriculum without the bloodshed, cursing, trash talk, and violence that these now 10th grade boys live for. The more research I did, the more positive aspects I stumbled across for gaming to be beneficial in educational environments. There were actual studies demonstrating how gaming can enhance brain flexibility improving a teen’s ability to learn, improvise, problem-solve quickly and efficiently, focus intently on goals in spite of external distractions, increase visual and audial acuity, multi-task, collaborate, make predictions in order to plan and implement strategies for success, and even relieve stress to be able to clear your mind and body of tension that could prevent learning – all issues that my son with SLD struggles to overcome in the classroom. How can I transfer these benefits to my students in my inclusion classes with similar obstacles?

            I found the amazing gift of Kahoot! I’m not gonna lie; I was real scared to approach a computer-based technological activity that required my kids to actually USE THEIR CELL PHONES IN CLASS! But if I’ve learned nothing else in my experience as a teacher, I’ve learned to be honest with my kids and admit when I do not know everything. Bingo! The students become the teachers and proceed to step up to the challenge vigorously to demonstrate to me how this modality can enhance their learning. All I could think was, is this what curriculum integration looks like? Basically Kahoot! is an international interactive gaming platform with over 50 languages available that can be downloaded in a free app to cell phones or a website opened up on a pc in which teachers and students can play educational games individually or on teams that they themselves create on any academic subject. In addition to creating their own academic games in every language my kids speak, they can play other students’ games that are shared publicly on the site. Recently Kahoot! released a new Challenge Mode for HW used to assign after-class challenges to students, either by sharing a unique PIN or link via e-mail, Google Classroom or other messengers they use. The challenges called “kahoots,” or trivia quiz games, can be customized and cover a range of topics i.e. English, Science, Math, History, Geography. The company also recently launched an online library for curriculum-aligned kahoots for K–12 classrooms. I am still trying to learn all the cool ways I can incorporate this medium in my classes, but so far my favorite is having my students’ create their own Kahoots! to share and play in class. My ELLs focus on creating vocabulary games so they are learning the synonyms and antonyms in English so deeply since they have to create the answer choices as well as the questions. My more advanced students create formative assessments without even realizing it on literature we read in class like Macbeth. I can even retrieve data on each kid’s answers and note their progress in the reports option. Coolest thing ever though is that the immediate scores come up on the leaderboard on the Smart Board but no one knows who got which answers correct or incorrect except for me and that respective student.

                The potential problems that have arisen with my student population which is Title I, is not having a cell phone to play with or not having a data plan with service. So I reserve class sets of laptops just in case we need them and I provide them with my hotspot for data. This easily avoids kids feeling bad about not having and prevents teasing because no one really pays attention to who has or has not because they are all so engaged in the game designing and competition of creating the best questions and researching the best answer choices. Resources to participate fully are made available to all. My ELLs love creating games in their native language and sharing them which gives my native English speakers a great insight and lesson on how it feels to try to learn content in a different language. Very empowering for them!

                Only other negative issue I have experienced was bot hacking our games. I’m not sure I am saying that correctly or even sure I can explain in writing what that is, but it happened, it ruined our games, and we had to start over. I did figure out who did it but it wasn’t the norm. Only one wise guy in one class who eventually stopped when I redirected his brilliant sinister gamer mind by assigning him more rigorous tasks to focus on completing! Conclusion: Kahoots! has opened up a whole new world for my kids to succeed and learn. I am super stoked! Game on!

The Struggle is Real for Innovation FOMO…

 

Curriculum Integration!!! What a truly exciting article this was for me. I believe this is precisely how a learning environment should be designed, created, and fostered for authentic learning to occur and develop inherently deep-rooted relevant knowledge in our students. “Curriculum integration classes are designed to promote cognitive growth for students—not feed them content to be regurgitated on demand.” (Brown 2011) I have always felt this way about student-centered and constructed curriculum development theoretically and honestly tried to emulate such in my own classrooms, yet have rarely seen it actually ensue ultimately due to external Administrative constraints. Montessori and International Baccalaureate Programs have been the closest approximation I have personally witnessed; however even those pedagogies have very distinct and required formats beyond a student-designed curriculum. I’m so curious about how much freedom these schools actually allowed their students and what such successful programs exactly look like in reality, not just in the world of academic research. This study definitely motivated me to spend more time exploring valid exemplary models and other articles related to CI like those cited by Brown & Knowles (2007). A lingering question I had was what is happening currently with these CI Programs, and where and how, being that the most recent citations from this study are just about 10 years old already? Like most educators, I would assume, I crave to provide the most engaging lessons for my kids. It’s undeniable that I was inspired by Brown’s conclusion that, “Students emphasize being highly motivated due to the choice they have in determining curricula.” (2011) Yet, I can’t help but be leery of how I could make such CI models come to fruition in a NYS Public HS, and what battles I would have to fight in order to do so, the reality possibly too overwhelming to conquer. Is there compromise?

Critical Approaches to Media in Urban English Language Arts Teacher Development by Ernest Morrell, University of California, Los Angeles

          “As English educators, we have a major responsibility to help future English teachers to redefine literacy instruction in a manner that is culturally and socially relevant, empowering, and meaningful to students who must navigate a diverse and rapidly changing world.” (Morrell 158) Yeeeeeeeeeesssssssss Pleeeeeaaaaasssseeeeee!!!

Do you ever get so excited about something that you can’t sleep? That is exactly how I feel about teaching daily, especially when I have an amazing new idea on how to approach a specific lesson in a unique and engaging way. I cannot wait to present this new way of learning to my students to see how they respond. I get even more excited if my kids come to class with their own brilliant ideas on creating an approach to a lesson. The learning is then in their hands and I am merely the facilitator. That is the way I believe truly effective education should be. “You will recognize your own path when you come upon it, because you will suddenly have all the energy and imagination you will ever need” (Jerry Gillies) I originally heard this quote from a spoken-word poem I always share with my kids for a Journal prompt called “The American’T Dream(The Purse Suit Of Happyness)”(Suli Breaks 2013) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tzcxOl4b7IA

He is only one of the many spoken word artists that I share with my kids…My favs are Rudy Francisco, Marshall Soulful Jones, Team Nuyorican, Brave New Voices, Melissa Lozada-Oliva, and too many more to give credit to for helping me motivate and inspire my kids with new perspectives on studying literature. My kids get so focused and passionate when they can have the freedom to use variant mediums to demonstrate their understanding and acquired knowledge of difficult texts in class. They create short movies and trailers with their phones based on Hamlet, Othello, Macbeth, and King Lear. They design storyboards, graphic novels, comics, and bitstrips on Google Slide Show Presentations to illustrate their genius in analyzing and interpreting classical literature and poetry. They research song lyrics, animals, and pictures of inanimate objects to symbolize their character analyses from Lady Macbeth to Star in The Hate U Give. Teachers CAN enact classroom curricula and pedagogies that simultaneously empower students culturally and adhere to state and national literacy standards as this study suggests. I see it happen daily.

The essence of this article is that English educators need to consider moving toward multimedia theme-based units that incorporate poems, film, music, and the Internet and allow students to express their ideas through essays, e-mails, Websites, videos, and drama. English studies will only remain relevant to the extent that students develop the conceptual and methodological tools to critically interrogate multiple streams of information. (Morrell 169) Advances in technology are transforming what it means to be literate (Cushman, Kingten, Kroll, & Rose, 2001; Kress, 2003)

Uncommon Sense? What is the norm?

“Unfortunately, the likelihood of having well-qualified teachers differs across socially defined groups in the United States: Large proportions of the teaching staff in poor schools are made up of noncredentialed or unqualified teachers. Substitutes also regularly fill the places of full-time teachers in these schools, staff turnover is great, and there is often little support for English language learners (Fashola, Slavin, Calderon, & Duran, 2001; Peske & Haycock, 2006). Thus, poor and language minority students are much more likely to be exposed to unqualified teachers, with implications for their intellectual development.” (ECCLES AND ROESER, 225-6) Ok this pissed me off in all kinds of ways. I have only ever taught in Title I schools for the past 27 years, and the faculty and support staff have always been the most dedicated, highly-qualified, and hardest working educators. Maybe I just live in a bubble of my own experiences; maybe the schools I have worked in have not been the norm. This blanket statement was just offensive. It made me curious about the sample schools this study researched.

Ironically, the remainder of the observations, conclusions, and critiques of this study were spot on in reference to my personal beliefs and practices in relation to the efficacy of teachers and the responsibilities we as educators have as a major influential part of adolescent development. Much of what was said seemed common sense to me. “Both cross-sectional and longitudinal studies have shown that the quality of teacher – student relationships and students’ feelings of classroom belonging predict changes in students’ academic motivation, engagement and learning, and social – emotional well-being in school.” (Burchinal et al., 2008; Deci & Ryan, 2002; Hattie, 2009; NRC/IOM, 2004; Roeser et al., 2000; Wentzel & Wigfield, 2007) It baffles me that these pedagogical tenets and practices are not the standard. I have seen it first-hand; kids perform better when they believe that their teachers genuinely care about them as individuals and believe in them and their ability to succeed, regardless of their previous academic “records”.  Not only have I only taught in Title I schools, but I have developed an affinity for creating a classroom in which at-risk students, kids who have failed elsewhere and are on the verge of dropping out, turn their lives around, not only graduating high school (many the first in their family to do so), but also going on to succeed in college. I am not unique to this experience; most of my professional colleagues are of the same convictions and competences essential to adolescent development and achievement.

Paradoxically Beautiful Brains Indeed…

“So if teens think as well as adults do and recognize risk just as well, why do they take more chances? Here, as elsewhere, the problem lies less in what teens lack compared with adults than in what they have more of. Teens take more risks not because they don’t understand the dangers but because they weigh risk versus reward differently: In situations where risk can get them something they want, they value the reward more heavily than adults do.” (Dobbs 4)

Yessssssss I understand this theoretically, yet as a parent of 3 between the ages of 15-24, how will I survive this anomaly emotionally? It’s so ironic that I am so afraid of losing my kids, yet paradoxically so flipping proud of their bravery, initiative, independence, and resilient risk-taking characteristics. I do remember feeling and thinking I too was invincible at that age, no fear could prevent my perilous acts. I should literally be dead for all the ridiculously inane choices I made as a teen; it baffles me when exactly that transition occurred, my fear outweighing my desire for reward. I think it may have actually been when I decided I had more, so much more than myself, to lose by the possible consequences of the risks. I know undoubtedly that happened when I became a parent. This segues into the next most salient point of interest for me in this article.

“Studies show that when parents engage and guide their teens with a light but steady hand, staying connected but allowing independence, their kids generally do much better in life.” (Dobbs 5) The struggle is real. Trying to navigate the crater potholes and massive speed bumps on the road of parenting adolescents is emotionally exhausting. This quote gave me hope. I know we are supposed to relate these articles to our experiences as educators yet I can’t help but make immediate connections to me as a parent, these two roles are very indistinguishable for me. Some days I feel like I’m more successful as a high school teacher than a parent. Why is it so much easier to practice these tenets with my students daily in my classrooms rather than at home with my own kids?