When I first arrived to Spain, I somewhat had an idea of what kind of relationship I wanted to have with my faculty mentor and Servicio Domestico Activo. I’m a fairly independent person so I thought I would communicate with them when I needed to. Meeting with Sedoac for the first time gave me the impression that this idea would work just fine since the members have jobs and families to take care of, not just the organization. However, this also meant that every time I had an idea for their YouTube channel or their blog, it would take a few weeks for me to be able to discuss those ideas. Also, because I had many suggestions and posted on their Facebook account, I was sometimes seen as an intern, not a fellow. It was also kind of a foreign idea to me to be in a new country for the sake of doing research and learning. One of the sources of anxiety I had to deal with was having to learn that doing research is not always about excessive productivity, that I can be a passive observer/learner. Being a passive learner allowed me to not have an agenda when I met new people from Sedoac and other domestic work organizations; instead, I would listen to conversations and ask questions when I didn’t understand something. I sometimes felt like the author of On the Run, Alice Goffman (without all the problematic observer-participation, of course).
I also now have a different idea of what it means to be a sociologist. As a sociology major, I spend a lot of time sitting in front of a computer, reading research papers, compiling information and figuring out how different social phenomena are interconnected as I write. This summer, however, I spent a lot more time actually talking to the people I do research about. I think it is important to meet people who are often the participants or subjects in social research because it reminds why your research matters. I feel that many researchers have this robotic way of doing research because it is easy to lose sight of why you are interested in a certain phenomenon when all you have in front of you is data that you need to put together to answer a question. There’s often a disconnect between the researcher and the research participants that I think can be bridged by directly interacting with the participants. I have worked with researchers who make sweeping statements about the populations they are researching because, I think, not interacting with these populations dehumanizes them in a way.
I also learned to be more open to new ways of viewing things in order to gain a better understanding of domestic work in Spain. Domestic workers who are involved in activism do not only think about themselves but also about the families they take care of and the government. It is not only about gaining equal labor rights but about a country whose economy and social security system are failing people who need care services. Moreover, many of the people in these families have also provided care services to families in other European countries, which, I think, makes migrant care workers view the lack of labor benefits as a social issue, not just an individual matter. I hope to be able to conduct research in the future about the dynamic between the different sides of domestic work (the migrant worker, the person/family being cared for, the laws that influence their relationship) and how economic changes have affected how each side views domestic work.