Borderlands

immigration

Intervención México—Tri-Lateral Accord–Cartel Cessation of Criminal Activities.

by Leave a Comment

HEADQUARTERS

7th Comm. Bn. (-) Rein.

FPO PacFlt Support
FMF SF 9002x
May 2025
 
Fm.     Charlie.Two SU Alpha.
To.      CMG, FMF
Subj.  Intervención México–Tri-Lateral Accord–Cartel Cessation of Criminal Activities.
 
 Ref: DivO 5750.2B
    (a) MCO 5750.4
    (b) FMF Pac 5750.8
    (c) DivO 57550.2B
 
Encl: (1) In accordance with the above provisions of references (a), (b), and (c), enclosure (1) is submitted herewith.
 
https://easy-peasy.ai/ai-image-generator/images/mexican-gangsters-flamboyant-weapons-neon-lit-alleyPART I.  INTRODUCTION
    A hypothetical title for an agreement between Mexico, the United States, and cartels to halt smuggling and trafficking could be:
    “Trilateral Accord for the Cessation of Transnational Smuggling and Trafficking Activities” (TACT-Smuggling/Trafficking)
    This title reflects cooperation among the three parties-Mexico, the U.S., and cartels-focused on ending illegal smuggling and trafficking operations. It aligns with ongoing efforts by both governments to combat cartel activities through law enforcement cooperation, sanctions, and pressure tactics, as described in recent U.S. and Mexico initiatives.
PART II.     ORGANIZATIONAL DATA
    A hypothetical organizational chart to coordinate a stand-down of smuggling and trafficking among the United States, Mexico, and cartels would involve a trilateral structure combining government and cartel leadership with clear communication and enforcement roles:
 
1.  United States Government Leadership
        a.  President of the United States
        b.  Secretary of Homeland Security 
        c.  Attorney General 
        d.  DEA Administrator 
        e.  U.S. Ambassador to Mexico
2. Mexican Government Leadership
        a.  President of Mexico 
        b.  Secretary of Security and Citizen Protection
        c.  Attorney General of Mexico
        d.  Head of Mexican National Guard
        e.  Mexican Ambassador to the U.S.
3. Cartel Leadership (Hypothetical Representatives for Negotiation)
        a.  Sinaloa Cartel Leader 
        b.  Jalisco New Generation Cartel Leader
        c.  Gulf Cartel Leader
        e.  Other major cartel representatives
4.  Coordination Structure Trilateral Security Council: 
        a.  Composed of top officials from the U.S. and Mexican governments and designated cartel negotiators, tasked with setting strategic objectives and overseeing compliance.
        b.  Joint Intelligence and Enforcement Task Force: Includes DEA, FBI, Mexican Federal Police, and cartel-appointed liaison officers to share intelligence and coordinate operations to prevent violence and trafficking.
        c.  Economic and Social Development Committee: Focused on reducing cartel incentives by promoting legal economic opportunities in cartel-controlled regions, involving U.S. and Mexican economic agencies.
        d.  Monitoring and Compliance Unit: Independent body with representatives from both governments and neutral international observers to monitor adherence to the stand-down agreement.
        e.  This structure would require unprecedented cooperation and trust, with cartel leaders agreeing to cease trafficking and violence in exchange for negotiated terms. 
                (1)  Current frameworks like the U.S.-Mexico High Level Contact Group for Drug Control and the High-Level Security Dialogue provide a foundation but do not include cartel participation. 
                (2)  The U.S. designation of cartels as terrorist organizations complicates direct negotiation but highlights the need for innovative approaches.
5.  Agency Name U.S.-Mexico Border Compliance and Verification Agency (B-CVA)
        a.  Mission 
                (1)  To monitor, verify, and enforce cartel compliance with the halt of smuggling and trafficking activities, ensuring transparency and cooperation between U.S. and Mexican authorities.
        b.  Key Functions Monitoring & Intelligence: 
                (1)  Use advanced surveillance, data analytics, and joint intelligence sharing to detect any illicit activity or breaches.
        c.  Verification & Auditing: 
                (1)  Conduct regular inspections and audits of border crossings, financial transactions, and known cartel networks.
        d.  Liaison & Coordination: 

                (1)  Act as a bridge between U.S. agencies (DEA, DHS, FBI, Treasury) and Mexican law enforcement to maintain continuous communication and cooperation.

6.  Enforcement: Coordinate with law enforcement to respond swiftly to violations, including sanctions, arrests, and asset seizures.
        a.  Community Outreach: Work with border communities to gather intelligence and reduce cartel influence.
        b.  Structure Joint U.S.-Mexico Leadership: Co-led by appointed officials from both countries to ensure mutual trust and accountability.
        c.  Multidisciplinary Teams: Comprising law enforcement, financial crime experts, intelligence analysts, and legal advisors.
        d.  Technology Division: Focused on monitoring drug shipments, human trafficking, and financial flows using cutting-edge tech.
7.  Compliance Review Board: Independent body to review agency actions and cartel compliance reports.
        a.  Accountability Measures Transparent reporting to both governments and the public.
        b.  Regular third-party audits.
Clear metrics for success, such as reductions in trafficking incidents and cartel-related violence.
        c.  This agency would leverage existing cooperation frameworks and address the complex challenges of cartel operations, which include fentanyl trafficking, human smuggling, and money laundering.
PART III.    NARRATIVE SUMMARY
    A hypothetical scenario where Mexican cartels agree to halt smuggling and trafficking into the US might unfold as follows:
 
1.  The US and Mexican governments launch a comprehensive, well-funded bilateral initiative combining enhanced law enforcement cooperation, economic incentives, and social programs to reduce cartel influence and provide alternative livelihoods in cartel-controlled regions.
        a.  The initiative includes expanded legal migration pathways and expedited asylum processing to reduce migrants’ reliance on smugglers, undermining cartel profits from human trafficking.
        b.  In exchange for substantial financial aid, infrastructure investment, and reduced military pressure, major cartels like Sinaloa and Jalisco agree to cease drug and human smuggling operations into the US, motivated by the prospect of long-term stability and legitimate business opportunities.
        c.  Cartels receive guarantees of non-interference in certain local economic activities and protection from aggressive military crackdowns, fostering a fragile but enforceable truce.
        d.  Both governments enhance border security technology and intelligence sharing to monitor compliance, while community programs aim to reduce violence and cartel recruitment.
        d.  Over time, cartel revenues from smuggling drop sharply, and violence related to trafficking declines, though challenges remain in fully dismantling criminal networks.
        e.  This scenario hinges on unprecedented cooperation, significant resources, and addressing root causes of migration and cartel power, which have historically made such agreements difficult to achieve.
 
PART IV.   SIGNIFICANT EVENTS
 
1.  A dialogue between Mexican cartels and the U.S. government would likely focus on several critical issues:
        a.  Drug trafficking and smuggling routes: Addressing the flow of illicit drugs, including fentanyl, across the U.S.-Mexico border, and efforts to disrupt these operations.
        b.  Cartel designation and legal implications: 
                (1)  The U.S. has designated major Mexican cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations, which affects law enforcement tactics, asset freezes, and prosecution strategies.
        c.  Security cooperation and intelligence sharing: 
                (1)  Discussions on joint efforts to combat cartels, including intelligence exchange, training, and coordinated law enforcement actions, while balancing Mexico’s sovereignty concerns.
        d.  Cartel violence and terrorism tactics: 
                (1)  Addressing cartel violence in Mexico and potential threats in the U.S., including cyber operations and retaliation risks.
        e.  Corruption and governance: 
                (1)  Tackling corruption within Mexican institutions that enable cartel operations, a key obstacle to effective enforcement.
        f.  Economic and social factors: 
                (1)  Exploring ways to reduce drug demand in the U.S. and support economic development in Mexico to undermine cartel recruitment and influence.
        g.  Potential U.S. unilateral actions: The possibility and consequences of U.S. military or covert operations against cartels in Mexico, which remain highly sensitive and controversial.
        h.  Overall, the dialogue would balance enforcement, legal, diplomatic, and socio-economic dimensions to address the complex transnational threat posed by cartels.
 
2.  A hypothetical summit between Mexican cartels and the US government is highly unlikely and unprecedented given the current context of escalating conflict and military posturing. 
        a.  The US has increasingly treated Mexican cartels as foreign terrorist organizations, with recent designations granting enhanced counterterrorism powers, including covert operations and potential military action on Mexican soil.            b.  The US approach involves a combination of military pressure, covert CIA and special forces operations, and diplomatic efforts to compel cartels to cease drug trafficking and sever ties with hostile states.
 
PART V.   SEQUENTIAL ASPECTS
    A hypothetical series of events leading to a trilateral accord between the U.S., Mexico, and cartels for cessation in smuggling and trafficking could unfold as follows:
 
1.  Escalating violence and mutual losses: 
        a.  Continued cartel violence destabilizes Mexican regions and increases U.S. opioid deaths, pressuring all parties to seek peace.
 
2.   Backchannel negotiations: 

        a.  Mexican government intermediaries and U.S. officials initiate secret talks with cartel leaders, leveraging existing cartel territorial divisions and alliances to propose a ceasefire and regulated smuggling corridors.

3.  Cartel leadership consolidation: 
        a.  Cartels unify or form alliances to reduce infighting, increasing their bargaining power and willingness to negotiate for stability and profit preservation.
 
4.  Mutual recognition of interests: 
        The U.S. acknowledges the limits of interdiction, Mexico seeks reduced violence, and cartels desire legal protections and reduced law enforcement pressure, creating common ground.
 
5.  Drafting the accord: 
        a.  Terms include cessation of violent turf wars, regulated trafficking routes with cartel cooperation on smuggling reduction, and anti-corruption commitments from Mexican authorities, with U.S. offering economic incentives and scaled-back enforcement in exchange.
 
6.  Public announcement and enforcement: 
        a.  The accord is publicly announced, with joint U.S.-Mexico monitoring and cartel self-policing to maintain peace and reduce trafficking-related violence.
        b.  This scenario mirrors past cartel territorial pacts and recognizes the complex interplay of corruption, enforcement limits, and cartel business models.
PART VI.     CIVIL AFFAIRS
    International press and social media might spin a trilateral accord between the U.S., Mexico, and cartels to halt smuggling and trafficking in various ways:
 
1.  U.S. mainstream media (e.g., CNN, The New York Times) could frame it as a controversial but pragmatic step toward reducing violence and drug flow, highlighting government efforts to combat cartels while questioning the ethics of negotiating with criminal groups.
 
2.  Mexican outlets (e.g., El Universal, Milenio) might emphasize sovereignty and cooperation, portraying the accord as a necessary evil to restore peace and security, while also scrutinizing cartel influence on politics.
 
3.  International media (e.g., BBC, Al Jazeera) could analyze it as a complex case of state-criminal collusion, reflecting on the blurred lines between law enforcement and organized crime in the region.
4.  Social media platforms would likely see polarized reactions: some users praising any move to reduce violence, others condemning perceived legitimization of cartels.
 
5.  Cartels themselves might use social media to spin the accord as a victory or peace deal to boost their image and recruitment, given their active use of platforms like Facebook for smuggling and propaganda.
6.  Communist nations might spin a tri-party agreement between the U.S., Mexico, and cartels to halt smuggling and trafficking as evidence of U.S. imperialism and collusion with corrupt elements to control and suppress Mexico and its people. 
        a.  They could argue that the U.S. is using the cartel issue to justify military intervention and economic pressure (tariffs, sanctions) on Mexico, undermining its sovereignty and exploiting internal conflicts for geopolitical gain. 
                (1)  The narrative might emphasize that the U.S. is framing cartels as “terrorist organizations” to legitimize harsh counterterrorism measures, covert operations, and military presence in Mexico, portraying these actions as a form of neo-colonialism or proxy warfare rather than genuine cooperation against crime.                 (2)   Additionally, communist rhetoric might highlight the historical complicity and corruption within Mexican political and military elites who have long benefited from trafficking, suggesting the agreement is a façade that ignores deeper systemic issues and perpetuates inequality and violence. 
                (3)  They could also claim the agreement serves U.S. capitalist interests by protecting drug markets and controlling migration flows rather than addressing the root causes of trafficking and smuggling. 
        b.   In sum, the spin would frame the agreement as a U.S.-led coercive strategy to dominate Mexico and suppress popular resistance, rather than a genuine multilateral effort to combat crime.
 
6.  Overall, the narrative would vary from cautious optimism about reducing trafficking to deep concerns over cartel empowerment and rule-of-law erosion.
 
PART VII.   SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
 
1.  Key supporting documents and evidence that would typically be associated with such an agreement include:
        a.  Bilateral and Multilateral Agreements: 
                (1)  Existing U.S.-Mexico agreements on drug trafficking and border security, such as memorandums of understanding and joint law enforcement protocols.
        b.  Sanctions and Designations:
                (1)   U.S. Treasury and State Department documents designating cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs) and imposing sanctions on cartel members and entities.
        c.  Law Enforcement Coordination Records: 
                (1)  Documentation of joint operations and enforcement actions between U.S. and Mexican agencies (DEA, FBI, HSI, Mexican law enforcement).
        d.  Alerts and Advisories: 
                (1)  Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) alerts and red flag typologies related to smuggling and trafficking schemes.
Indictments and Legal Filings: Federal indictments and court records detailing cartel operations, alliances, and enforcement actions.
        e.  Intelligence Assessments: 
                (1)  Reports and intelligence sharing agreements regarding cartel activities, trafficking routes, and enforcement outcomes.
        f.  Press Releases and Official Statements: 
                (1)  Public announcements from U.S. and Mexican government agencies on enforcement actions, sanctions, and policy shifts.
2.  No public evidence exists of a formal tri-party agreement including cartels as official signatories; most documents reflect government-to-government cooperation and enforcement actions against cartels, not with their participation.
3.  Synthetic intelligence: Perplexity AI
 

4.  Current news, media platforms, outlets, social media venues.

5.  Image:  https://easy-peasy.ai/ai-image-generator/images/mexican-gangsters-flamboyant-weapons-neon-lit-alley
 
6.  Report:  JC-Lima, NCTC/R. (204xxxx-2533), FB Tango.
 
JTF-SB 2025                                                                                      
3/LRC/cr1/5750
CMCC NR _____3______                                                           
Ser. No. 040-25
COPY _1__ OF __10__COPIES                                                    
May 2025  
 
END OF REPORT

JTF-SB–Operation Tripwire: Border Anti-Infiltration Exercise

by Leave a Comment

HEADQUARTERS

Joint Task Force (JTF-SB)

USNORTHCOM

Fort Huachuca, AZ 85613

May 2025

CONFIDENTIAL

From:   C.O.,  27th RLT

To:        CMG, 1st MarDiv, (-) Rein.

Subj:     Command Chronology (Appx.) for the Period of _5__2025.\

Ref. (a) MCO 5750.4

        (b) FMF Pac 5750.8

        (c)  DivO 57550.2B

OPERATION TRIPWIRE: Field Exercise.

 

 OVERVIEW    

Operation Tripwire is a multi-day, joint field exercise designed for Joint Task Force-Southern Border (JTF-SB) to test and enhance operational readiness, interagency coordination, and rapid response capabilities along the U.S. southern border. 

     The exercise will simulate real-world scenarios involving border incursions, illicit trafficking, and potential terrorist threats, with a focus on information sharing, detection, and rapid interdiction.

1. Unit Objectives:

    a. Validate command and control procedures for multi-domain operations across the 2,000-mile southern border.

    b. Enhance interoperability between Army, Marine, Air Force, and interagency partners (DHS, CBP).

    c. Test rapid deployment, detection, monitoring, and response capabilities in support of Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

    d. Practice information sharing and situational awareness using platforms like TRIPwire to identify and mitigate IED and terrorist threats.

    e. Evaluate logistics, sustainment, and medical support under field conditions.

2. Assignments and Areas of Responsibility:

Unit/Element Area of Responsibility Primary Assignment
JTF-Southern Border HQ (10th Mountain Division) Fort Huachuca, AZ (HQ); C2 across all sectors Overall command, control, and coordination
2nd Brigade, 4th Infantry Division San Diego, CA to Yuma, AZ Detection, monitoring, and rapid response patrols
101st Division Sustainment Brigade El Paso, TX to Laredo, TX Logistics, supply chain, and sustainment operations
89th Military Police Brigade Laredo, TX to McAllen, TX Security, detainee operations, and law enforcement
3rd Combat Aviation Brigade All sectors (rotary-wing support as needed) Aerial surveillance, medevac, and rapid troop movement
1st Combat Engineer Battalion, 1st Marine Div. Critical infrastructure points (all sectors) Obstacle emplacement, route clearance, and IED response
DHS/CBP Liaison Teams Embedded with each sector Intelligence sharing, operational coordination
 

3. Exercise Phases:

    a. Phase 1: Planning and Coordination

           (1) Conduct joint mission briefings and establish sector command posts

           (2) Integrate TRIPwire and other information-sharing platforms for threat awareness

           (3) Red team planning to simulate adversary actions and stress-test unit responses.

    b. Phase 2: Field Operations

            (1) Simulated border incursions and illicit trafficking attempts in each sector.

            (2) Detection and monitoring using ground and aerial assets.

            (3) Rapid interdiction and apprehension drills.

            (4) Engineering teams respond to simulated IED threats and infrastructure breaches.

    c. Phase 3: Sustainment and Medical Response.

            (1)  Logistics units test resupply and maintenance under field conditions.

            (2) Medical teams conduct casualty evacuation and forward surgical support in austere environments.

    d. Phase 4: After-Action Review and Lessons Learned.

            (1) Debrief all units on operational successes and areas for improvement.

            (2) Capture lessons learned in command and control, information sharing, and interagency coordination for future operations.

4. Key Exercise Outcomes:

    a. Improved readiness and agility of JTF-SB and subordinate units.

    b. Enhanced interagency communication and operational synergy with DHS and CBP.

    c. Validated procedures for rapid response to complex border security threats, including terrorism and transnational crime.

5. Notes:

    a. Each sector command is responsible for coordination with adjacent units to ensure seamless coverage and rapid mutual support.

    b. The exercise will emphasize the importance of information sharing platforms like TRIPwire for real-time situational awareness and threat mitigation.

    c. Logistics and sustainment operations are critical to maintaining operational tempo across the dispersed border sectors.

    d. Operation Tripwire will serve as a comprehensive readiness test, ensuring JTF-Southern Border can effectively synchronize joint and interagency efforts to secure the southern border and respond to emerging threats.

JTF-SB 2025

3/LRC/cr1/5750

CMCC___NR___

Ser. No. 04025

COPY___OF__COPIES

Image: https://verticalmag.com/features/tiltrotor-revolution-mv-22b-osprey/

Information provided by search queries at Perplexity. AI.

Format drawn from Vietnam USMC combat regiment command chronologies; Texas Tech U.

JCL, Pvt., USMC, (212xxxx) 27th RLT-HQ, (AT998670)

CONFIDENTIAL

Measles USA: From Patient Zero to Zero Patience

by Leave a Comment

The Sacramento Bee, 01 January 2016, page A1.

BORDERLANDS

Measles USA: From Patient Zero to Zero Patience

Vol. 25. Issue 02.27-Exclusive

Introduction

     With the news of an infected child who died in Texas recently, a new concern is rising nationwide involving a number of issues, Medicare, retreat from the World Health Organization, medical qualifications of the new Health and Human Services secretary, an outspoken anti-vaccination advocate, cutting back funding for the National Institute of Health, to mention those directly on the radar. Much of that, although directly related to the outbreak, will be addressed only when context is needed to clarify the roots of the surge in measles case, beginning with background, the cure, much-touted “eradication,” a look at a previous similar spread, and ending with a focus on the Texas situation.

Methodology

The format will be:

a.) Introduction; b.) Methodology; c.) Capsules- containing artificial intelligence, AI, query results enclosed in parenthesis (Begin Perplexity-AI) and (End Perplexity-AI). The queries will have in-line links to where the information was recovered along with the generic link of the query; d.) Newspaper Archives; e.) Congressional Records; f.) Notes; g.) Afterword.

Capsules

(Begin Perplexity-AI)

measles

Measles is a highly contagious viral infection caused by the measles virus, a member of the Morbillivirus genus within the Paramyxoviridae family2. It is an airborne disease that spreads easily through coughs and sneezes of infected individuals, with a reproductive number ranging from 3.7 to 203.32.

Symptoms and Progression

Symptoms typically appear 10-14 days after exposure and include:

  1. High fever (often exceeding 40°C or 104°F)

  2. Cough, runny nose, and red, watery eyes (conjunctivitis)

  3. Koplik’s spots (small white spots inside the cheeks)

  4. A characteristic red, maculopapular rash24

The rash usually begins on the face and neck, spreading to the rest of the body over several days. It lasts for about 5-6 days before fading4.

Complications

Measles can lead to severe complications, particularly in young children, pregnant women, and immunocompromised individuals. These may include:

  • Pneumonia

  • Encephalitis (brain inflammation)

  • Blindness

  • Severe diarrhea and dehydration

  • Ear infections24

Prevention and Vaccination

The measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine is the most effective way to prevent measles. Two doses of the MMR vaccine are 97% effective at preventing the disease3. Despite being declared eliminated in the United States in 2000, recent outbreaks have occurred due to decreasing vaccination rates and increased global measles activity3.

Recent Developments

As of February 27, 2025, there have been concerning developments regarding measles:

  1. A spike in measles cases has prompted county health officials to urge vaccination6.

  2. The first measles case in the San Antonio area has been confirmed in a first-grade classroom7.

  3. Tragically, an unvaccinated child in Texas has died from measles, marking the first such death in the United States in a decade8.

These recent events underscore the importance of maintaining high vaccination rates to protect individuals and communities from this potentially severe disease.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/measles-G_FJg42tTiu.CmNKbwn6.w

measles texas outbreak

A measles outbreak in West Texas has resulted in the first measles-related death in the United States in a decade. An unvaccinated school-aged child succumbed to the illness in Lubbock, Texas, marking a tragic milestone in the ongoing outbreak145.

Outbreak Details

  • As of February 26, 2025, there are 124 confirmed measles cases across nine counties in rural West Texas14.

  • The majority of cases (101) are among individuals aged 17 and younger3.

  • 18 people have been hospitalized due to the outbreak4.

  • Almost all cases are in unvaccinated individuals or those with unknown vaccination status4.

  • The outbreak has spread to eastern New Mexico, with nine additional cases reported there1.

Affected Communities

The outbreak is primarily affecting the Mennonite community in an area characterized by small towns separated by expansive, oil-rig-strewn landscapes1. These communities are interconnected through travel for work, religious activities, and daily necessities, facilitating the spread of the virus.

Public Health Response

Health officials emphasize that the most effective method for preventing measles is through two doses of the MMR (measles-mumps-rubella) vaccine, which can prevent over 97% of measles infections5. The outbreak highlights the importance of vaccination, as the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention indicates that up to 90% of unvaccinated individuals exposed to the virus will contract it1.

Additional Cases

While the West Texas outbreak is the most severe, measles cases have also been reported in other states, including Alaska, Georgia, New Jersey, New York City, and Rhode Island3. A separate case was also confirmed in an unvaccinated adult in Rockwall County, North Texas, though it is not believed to be connected to the West Texas outbreak6.

This outbreak serves as a stark reminder of the potential consequences of declining vaccination rates and the continued importance of public health measures to prevent the spread of highly contagious diseases like measles.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/measles-texas-outbreak-UDGo1X2UTTa_raXsKW.EkQ

budget cuts affecting measles outbreak

Recent budget cuts and policy changes have significantly impacted the response to measles outbreaks in the United States and globally. The current measles outbreak in Texas, which has infected at least 124 people and hospitalized 18, highlights the consequences of these cuts23.

Global Impact

The World Health Organization’s Global Measles and Rubella Laboratory Network (Gremlin) is at risk of collapse due to the loss of US funding. This network, which receives about $8 million annually from the US, is crucial for tracking and controlling infectious threats worldwide2. The potential collapse of Gremlin threatens measles elimination efforts and could impact the detection of other diseases like SARS-CoV-2, respiratory syncytial virus, and rare infections such as bird flu and Ebola2.

Domestic Consequences

In the United States, budget cuts and policy changes have affected the response to the current measles outbreak:

  1. Reduced vaccination rates: Disruptions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and misinformation have led to a decline in measles vaccination among schoolchildren, increasing the risk of outbreaks4.

  2. Staffing issues: Thousands of job cuts in health agencies have left public health departments understaffed, potentially hampering outbreak response efforts6.

  3. Policy changes: The new administration’s approach to public health, including the appointment of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. as Secretary of Health and Human Services, has raised concerns about the government’s response to vaccine-preventable diseases3.

  4. Funding cuts: The DOGE cuts and executive orders pausing some government operations have complicated the administration’s response to both the measles outbreak and other health threats like avian flu3.

These budget cuts and policy changes could have significant political implications, especially for Republican lawmakers in the upcoming midterm elections if diseases like measles continue to spread3. The situation underscores the importance of maintaining robust public health infrastructure and funding to prevent and respond to infectious disease outbreaks effectively.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/budget-cuts-affecting-measles-dryOtwFPTxme8r5HbPLoHA

social media blames illegal immigrants for texas measles outbreak

Social media posts blaming illegal immigrants for the recent measles outbreak in Texas are inaccurate and misleading. The current outbreak is primarily linked to low vaccination rates among certain communities, not immigration12.

The measles outbreak in West Texas has resulted in 124 confirmed cases as of February 2025, with the majority occurring among unvaccinated or under-vaccinated individuals, particularly children14. The first death from measles in the United States in a decade was reported in an unvaccinated school-aged child in Lubbock, Texas24.

Historically, similar misinformation has circulated during previous outbreaks. For instance, during a 2019 measles outbreak, a Facebook meme incorrectly blamed immigrants from South America, despite the virus being eliminated in that region in 20163.

The current outbreak is more likely due to:

  1. Declining vaccination rates: MMR vaccine coverage has dropped in Texas following the COVID-19 pandemic4.

  2. Travel-related cases: Recent outbreaks are often linked to travelers returning from countries with ongoing measles transmission3.

  3. Pockets of unvaccinated communities: The outbreak is largely occurring among unvaccinated or under-vaccinated members of certain communities5.

Health officials emphasize that vaccination is the most effective way to prevent measles, with two doses of the MMR vaccine being over 97% effective in preventing infection7. The spread of misinformation on social media platforms can contribute to vaccine hesitancy and hinder efforts to control the outbreak6.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/social-media-blames-illegal-im-IC.Q3shQRhydI00hKJmESA 

(End Perplexity-AI)

Newspaper Archive

The outbreak of 2015:

     Because there was a death in Texas related to the current situation, the news has glossed over most of the details on what happened in 2015, ignoring the events leading up to the single death in Washington state. The reason appears to be sensational, an effort to dethrone the new, unpopular HHS secretary, and an opportunity to drive a wedge in the new administration’s policy of “take no prisoners.” Much can be learned in the quest for a “patient zero” to determine who and where it began; in fact, it wasn’t Washington, but Disneyland in Southern California.

(Begin Newspaper Archive)

Disneyland measles outbreak spreads

ANAHEIM, Calif — The measles out-break that began at Disneyland during the holiday season is now spreading beyond people who contracted the disease at the theme park, with those patients now exposing others after returning to their hometowns, health officials said Saturday. There are now 51 confirmed cases of the highly contagious virus across California, three other states and Mexico, and the Orange County Health Care Agency said the reports of new cases “indicate the measles outbreak will continue to spread. – Daily News wire services.

(Longview, WA Daily News, 18 January 2015, page A2)

5 Disneyland workers diagnosed with measles

LOS ANGELES — Several employees at Disneyland have been diagnosed with measles, health officials confirmed Tuesday, as the total number of measles cases in the California-centered outbreak rose to 53. Two of those employees had been vaccinated, the Orange County Health Care Agency said. Health officials are investigating whether the other workers have proof of measles immunization.

(The Spokane Spokesman-Review, 21 January 2015, page A3)

(End Newspaper Archive)

     Headlines on the Disneyland link didn’t start appearing in newspapers until the first week in January. By then, cases were beginning to be reported across the West. The actual victim was from Washington state and not until June.

(Begin Newspaper Archive)

(Barstow Desert Dispatch, 10 January 2015, page A3)

19 measles cases tied to Disney theme parks

ASSOCIATED PRESS
SANTA ANA – Nineteen people from three states who visited Disney theme parks in California last month have now fallen ill with measles, health officials said Friday. The patients all visited Disneyland or Disney California Adventure between Dec. 15 and Dec. 20, the California Department of Public Health and the Orange County Health Agency said. Sixteen of the cases were in California, two in Utah, and one is in Colorado, officials said. Officials in California said that of the 16 cases in the state they have only verified that two were fully vaccinated against the disease. Some were partially vaccinated and at least two were too young to be vaccinated. More people may have been exposed when measles patients were treated at two local hospitals.

(Barstow Desert Dispatch, 10 January 2015, page A3)

(Peninsula Daily News, 03 July 2015, page 1)

Measles death is first in decade

Callam woman exposed in winter

BY ROB OLLIKAJNEN PENINSULA DAILY NEWS
PORT ANGELES — A Clallam County woman who died of measles in the spring was the first confirmed measles death in the U.S. since 2003 and the first in Washington state since 1990. . -The state Department of Health officials announced the death Thursday. “Our deepest sympathy goes out to the fam-ily,” said Iva Burks, Clallam County health and human services director. The woman, who was not identified, was likely exposed to measles at Olympic Medical Center during a winter outbreak in Clallam County, health officials said. Underlying disorder She was at the medical facility at the same time as a person who later developed a rash and was contagious for measles, state Health spokesman Donn Moyer said. “She had an underlying disorder, an autoimmune disorder, and she was taking a number of different drugs to modulate the immune system,” said Dr. Jeanette Stehr-Green, interim Clallam County health officer, in a Thursday interview. “Some of those medications would prevent her from mounting a good response to any infection.”

(Peninsula Daily News, 03 July 2015, page 1)

(End Newspaper Archive)

     The Washington case was not without complications. The fact that the victim had an autoimmune system defect and was on medication at the time contributed to contracting the disease. During the week of 04 July, a dispute erupted as to where the victim had been exposed to the disease. She had been transferred to the Olympic Medical Center (Port Angeles) from a clinic, unidentified, before her death at the University of Washington Medical Center in Seattle. The discovery of measles was made after her death. Other reports indicated the woman had been immunized as a child, but her symptoms showed lack of a rash. (Peninsula Daily News, 05 July 2015, page A4)

    In January 2016, California Governor Jerry Brown signed into law SB 277 requiring schoolchildren to be vaccinated against measles. 

     “Likely which is most controversial is SB277, which eliminated all exemptions to vaccine requirements for enrolling in public or private elementary and secondary elementary school. With adoption of the bill, parents must homeschool their children if they want to avoid vaccinations for nonmedical reasons.” (Marin Independent Journal, 01 January 2016, page A1) 

Congressional Record

     News of the outbreak had spread almost as fast as the disease itself, infecting the public at large and eventually reaching the halls of Congress, with the issue of vaccination at the forefront. The record shows 21 references to “measles” for legislative search results for the 116th Congress (2015-16).

(Begin Congressional Record)

Longtime U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas has died at ...THE MEASLES OUTBREAK (H686-87) 02 February 2015.

CREC-2015-02-02-pt1-PgH686-6.pdf

     (Ms. JACKSON LEE asked and was given permission to address the House for 1 minute.) 

     Ms. JACKSON LEE. (D-TX) Today, Mr. Speaker, I sent a letter to the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control requesting an alert to the public that highlights the importance of our children becoming vaccinated for this outbreak of measles, particularly the MMR. 

     The United States is experiencing a large multistate measles outbreak that started in California in December of 2014 and has spread to six additional States and Mexico. From December 28, Mr. Speaker, through January 21, 2015, 51 confirmed cases linked to this outbreak have been reported to the CDC: 42 from California and nine from six other States—three in Utah, two in Washington, one in Oregon, one in Colorado, one in Nebraska, and one in Arizona. 

     But the spread of this is enormous. The most disturbing aspect of this outbreak is that 86 percent of the patients who have contracted the disease had either been unvaccinated or had an unknown vaccination status. The outbreak is aggravated by the large number of children whose parents have chosen not to get the MMR vaccine. 

     What I want to focus on, Mr. Speaker, is for us to be cautious and for us to be able to do the right thing. The saddest case was an 8-month-old baby in Arizona—innocent—who was exposed to the measles. 

     I ask that we take this seriously, as a member of the Homeland Security Committee, and find a way to alert parents to make the right decision for their children. I will be continuing to work on this and have asked my own community to send out an alert to help save those children and the others who are vulnerable to the measles outbreak. (Image credit: Longtime U.S. Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee of Texas has died at age 74)

RESEARCH AND SCIENTIFIC INTEGRITY (H5602) 29 July 2015.

CREC-2015-07-29-pt1-PgH5602.pdf

The SPEAKER pro tempore. The Chair recognizes the gentleman from Florida (Mr. POSEY) for 5 minutes.

     Mr. (Bill) POSEY. (R-FL) Mr. Speaker, I rise today on matters of research and scientific integrity. To begin with, I am absolutely, resolutely provaccine. Advancements in medical immunization have saved countless lives and greatly benefited public health. That being said, it is troubling to me that, in a recent Senate hearing on childhood vaccinations, it was never mentioned that our government has paid out over $3 billion through the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program for children who have been injured by vaccinations…

     For these reasons, I bring the following matter to the House floor. In August 2014, Dr. William Thompson, a senior scientist at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, worked with a whistleblower attorney to provide my office with documents related to a 2004 CDC study that examined the possibility of a relationship between the mumps, measles, and rubella vaccine and autism.

HIRE MORE HEROES ACT OF 2015 (S6673-74) 16 September 2015

CREC-2015-09-16-pt1-PgS6669-3.pdf

     The PRESIDING OFFICER. The Senator from California.

     Mrs. BOXER. (D-CA) Thank you very much, Mr. President.

     The Centers for Disease Control, we know how important they are when we have an epidemic looming. It would be slashed by the Republican budget by $245 million, hurting our efforts to protect communities from diseases such as Ebola and the measles. We all thought the measles were gone. It came back in California and thank God for the CDC for helping us when we needed them.

(End Congressional Record)

     The degree of alarm over the spread of infectious disease such as measles gradually lost its appeal in Congress following the Disneyland outbreak of 2014-15. Curiously enough, if anything came of it was the growing grass roots movement against vaccinations, due in part to an effort to link them to autism. With the 2015 outbreak background in mind, congressional hearings surrounding the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy Jr. brought the subject of measles back into focus.

(Begin Congressional Record)

NOMINATION OF ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.; (S947-48 ) 12 February 2025.

CREC-2025-02-12-pt1-PgS947.pdf

     Mr. (Chris) VAN HOLLEN (D-MD). Madam President, I want to start by commending my colleague, the Senator from Vermont, Mr. WELCH, for his strong argument as to why we should all vote no on the nomination of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., to be Secretary of Health and Human Services, and I come to the floor tonight to voice my strong opposition to this nomination… 

     But when you look at that wide range of important subjects that HHS covers, Mr. Kennedy has no experience, no qualifications, in the vast majority of that work. Now, I don’t think any of us expect that one Secretary of HHS can know everything. But if you monitored the hearings and listened to Mr. Kennedy’s answers, you can see that Mr. Kennedy knows virtually nothing about all those important subjects. In fact, he was stunningly unprepared to discuss even the most basic programs at his confirmation hearing. 

     Unfortunately, his nephew, RFK, Jr., has spent decades unraveling that hard-won legacy by spreading lies and conspiracy theories about vaccines. It wasn’t that long ago that he spread vaccine conspiracy theories in Samoa, where his misinformation contributed to a measles outbreak that got 83 people killed, mostly infants and children…

     And, right now, there is a measles outbreak in West Texas that is threatening our children. And it is not the first one we have seen in recent months, and it will not be the last if these conspiracy theories continue to spread.

(End Congressional Record)

     Gathered from the nomination hearings in the senate, the Texas outbreak was already news.

(Begin Congressional Record)

NOMINATION OF ROBERT F. KENNEDY, JR.; (12 February 2025) (S952-53)

CREC-2025-02-12-pt1-PgS952.pdf

     Mr. (Jeff) MERKLEY (D-OR). Mr. President, my colleague from Connecticut is here past midnight. Why is he here past midnight? Because the health and welfare of our children and our families are at stake…

     In the middle of a 2017 measles outbreak in Minnesota’s Somali-American community, he falsely told parents the following: Africans and African Americans may be particularly vulnerable to vaccine injuries including autism. 

     He also falsely claimed that the global decline in measles was caused by ‘‘nutrition and clean water,’’ not the measles vaccine, and that children in California were getting measles ‘‘from the vaccine or . . . from somebody who got the vaccine.’’ …

     Mr. Kennedy has spent years undermining one of the greatest public health achievements in history: vaccines. His rhetoric directly contributed to the tragic 2019 measles epidemic in Samoa, which infected thousands and killed 83 people, primarily children. 

(End Congressional Record)

Notes   

     From the above, it is clear that not only are the measles not always detectable by the telltale rash, but any autoimmune deficiency, reliance on medication for particular health related issues, the fact that it takes a while for the symptoms to develop, leaves no assurance whatsoever that a source can be traced; compounded by the fact that social media used it as another opportunity to demonize a marginalized community, immigrants.

Afterword

     Before any conclusions can be drawn, it is clear the new White House administration needs to become more proactive in addressing even the slightest hint of another epidemic on the doorstep of the United States. Do not assume it was brought in by grubby illegal aliens from south of the border when it could have been by a millionaire from South Africa. Do not repeat the tired, stale argument that autism is anchored in vaccinations. Do not expect an HHS secretary with no experience not just in the medical field but settling down a terrified public with kids about to come home from school with red dots all over them, to have any answers at all. Do not cut the budget for health-related care and research. This, of course, is the short list.

AOC vs ICE: Culture Clash, Futureshock and Awe

by Leave a Comment

Future Shock by Alvin Toffler (1971) PaperbackIntroduction

     The dispute between Alexandria (AOC) Ocasio-Cortez and de facto border czar appointee Tom Homan has entered another week with no resolution in sight. The exchange of undignified comments between the two reflects not just the inexperience of both in facing a new crisis in immigration reform, but a deeper sociological-anthropological naivety in the attitudes of both.  

     This report will explore that very deeper meaning which appears to escape the shallow significance placed on it by those who would rather have it explode into full scale political warfare.

  

(Image credit: Future Shock by Alvin Toffler (1971) Paperback: Alvin Toffler: Amazon.com: Books)

Methodology

     The same format as previous will be used: a.] a social media post where applicable (not included here); b.] Capsules containing the artificial intelligence query enclosed in (Begin Perplexity) and (End Perplexity-A) with the link included; c.] Notes to evaluate, clarify, refute, confirm and determine the authorial intent of the AI; d.] Congressional Record; e.] Media related to the recovery process contained in the narrative.

Capsules

(Begin Perplexity-AI)

cultureshock definition

Culture shock is the feeling of confusion, uncertainty, or distress a person may experience when moving to an unfamiliar environment or culture237. It is a normal process that individuals go through when adapting to a new culture, especially when there are conflicts in values and customs between their home culture and the new one42. This can occur when moving to a new city or country, traveling abroad, or studying in a foreign country2.

Common feelings associated with culture shock include anxiety, confusion, homesickness, and even anger4. There is no real way to entirely prevent culture shock, as individuals are personally affected differently by cultural contrasts1.

Culture shock can be described as having distinct phases:

  •  Honeymoon: A period of excitement when first experiencing the new culture1.

  • Negotiation: Feelings of frustration or anxiety1.

  •  Adjustment: As an individual becomes more accustomed to the new environment12.

  •  Adaptation: Adjusting to the new culture and surroundings1.

To cope with culture shock, it can be helpful to connect with others, stay connected with familiar comforts, balance activities, remain active, and be patient4. Universities can also assist students by offering support programs that assist with preparation, in-country support, and post-program assistance1.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/cultureshock-definition-fn06fOVQSDe775BFKiEbVw

the aoc-border czar feud creates a sense of cultureshock among immigrants

The ongoing feud between Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) and President Trump’s border czar Tom Homan has indeed created a sense of culture shock among immigrants in the United States. This clash highlights the stark contrast in approaches to immigration enforcement and immigrant rights13.

On one side, AOC hosted a “Know Your Rights with ICE” webinar, providing information to immigrants about their rights during encounters with Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officers36. This action reflects a supportive stance towards immigrant communities, aiming to empower them with knowledge of their legal rights.

In contrast, Homan, representing a more hardline approach to immigration enforcement, suggested that AOC’s actions could be impeding law enforcement efforts15. He even went as far as to imply that she might face legal consequences for hosting the webinar6.

This polarization in approaches creates a confusing and potentially frightening environment for immigrants:

  1.  Mixed messages: Immigrants receive conflicting information from government officials, creating uncertainty about their status and rights.

  2.  Heightened fear: The aggressive rhetoric from immigration enforcement officials may increase anxiety within immigrant communities3.

  3. Trust issues: The clash between elected officials and enforcement agencies may erode immigrants’ trust in government institutions.

  4. Community division: The stark differences in approach can create divisions within communities, potentially isolating immigrant populations.

The use of terms like “shock and awe” in immigration enforcement further exacerbates this culture shock, framing ordinary immigrants as potential enemies and creating an atmosphere of fear and mistrust4.

This ongoing feud and the resulting culture shock underscore the complex and often contentious nature of immigration policy in the United States, leaving many immigrants caught in the middle of a heated political debate7.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/the-aoc-border-czar-feud-creat-6TT3JZRmRXu6DEsdakRbFA

border czar shock and awe rhetoric has created cultureshock in immigrants

The rhetoric of “shock and awe” employed by Trump’s border czar Tom Homan has indeed created a culture shock for immigrants and intensified the already challenging experience of adapting to a new country. This aggressive approach to immigration policy has several impacts:

Heightened Fear and Anxiety

The use of terms like “shock and awe” and promises of mass deportations have instilled fear in immigrant communities7. This rhetoric creates a hostile environment that exacerbates the culture shock experienced by immigrants, leading to increased anxiety and stress as they try to adjust to their new surroundings2.

Intensified Ethnocentrism

The aggressive border rhetoric has fueled ethnocentric attitudes among some segments of the U.S. population. This has led to:

  • Increased support for restrictive immigration policies

  • More negative perceptions of the cultural and economic impact of immigration

  • Disproportionate suspicion towards certain immigrant groups, particularly those from Latin America, Africa, and the Middle East2

Reinforcement of Stereotypes

The “shock and awe” approach reinforces harmful stereotypes about immigrants, particularly undocumented ones. This contributes to the phenomenon of “social illegality,” where individuals are presumed to be undocumented based on factors such as national origin, social class, or criminal background2. These stereotypes can negatively impact access to jobs, housing, healthcare, and education for immigrants, regardless of their actual status.

Potential for Violence

Extremism experts have expressed deep concern about the language used by some politicians when discussing migrants and the southern border. They warn that this rhetoric could inspire acts of violence against immigrant communities6. This threat of violence further compounds the culture shock and stress experienced by immigrants.

Impact on Public Discourse

The aggressive border rhetoric has significantly influenced public discourse on immigration. It has fostered fear and hostility towards disadvantaged populations, often portraying undocumented immigrants as dangerous criminals despite evidence showing a negative correlation between immigration and crime2.

In conclusion, the “shock and awe” rhetoric employed by figures like Tom Homan has intensified the culture shock experienced by immigrants, creating a more hostile and challenging environment for them to navigate as they attempt to adapt to life in the United States. This approach not only affects immigrants directly but also shapes broader societal attitudes towards immigration, potentially leading to long-lasting impacts on social cohesion and policy-making.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/border-czar-shock-and-awe-rhet-BKdKT7hTR32jb_P0EJuMFw

border czar shock and awe rhetoric has created culture clash in society

The “shock and awe” rhetoric employed by Trump’s border czar, Tom Homan, has indeed created a significant culture clash in American society. This approach has intensified the divide between those who support strict immigration enforcement and those who advocate for more lenient policies14.

Homan’s repeated use of the phrase “shock and awe” to describe the administration’s planned immigration actions has sparked fear and uncertainty among immigrant communities25. This aggressive stance has led to:

  1. Increased anxiety in immigrant communities, with some individuals avoiding work or keeping their children home from school5.

  2. A surge in immigration enforcement actions, with thousands of undocumented migrants detained since Trump’s return to office5.

  3. A resurgence of open displays of bigotry and hatred towards non-white and non-Christian individuals3.

The cultural divide has deepened, with Trump supporters celebrating the tough stance on immigration while opponents condemn it as cruel and inhumane4. This polarization reflects a broader cultural war over America’s identity and values3.

The “shock and awe” approach has also raised concerns about potential economic disruptions and school funding consequences as fearful immigrants alter their daily routines2. Critics argue that this strategy creates terror and undermines the basic human rights achieved through previous cultural struggles35.

As the administration pushes forward with its aggressive immigration policies, the cultural clash continues to intensify, with both sides becoming increasingly entrenched in their positions8. This divide reflects deeper tensions in American society regarding race, culture, and national identity3

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/border-czar-shock-and-awe-rhet-_qoz.1OCSnCZOLbKrxehjA

culture clash definition

A culture clash is a conflict that arises from the interaction of people with differing cultural values, beliefs, or norms167. It occurs when different cultures come into contact, leading to misunderstandings and tension2. These clashes can manifest in various settings, including the workplace and broader society, often highlighting inequalities and power dynamics4. Cultural conflict can arise from differences in values, language barriers, variations in cultural practices, and stereotyping or prejudice1.

Key aspects of cultural clashes:

  • Values and Beliefs: Cultural conflicts can occur when individuals or groups from different cultures have differing fundamental beliefs or moral values1.

  • Communication Styles: Different cultures may have distinct communication styles, leading to misunderstandings and tensions1.

  • Norms and Expectations: Cultural clashes can result from unmet expectations of behavior due to differing cultural backgrounds3.

  • Conflict Theory: Cultural conflict is a major type of conflict theory, where cultural and religious identities become primary sources of conflict3.

Addressing cultural clashes:

  •  Open Dialogue: Encouraging open communication and creating safe spaces for discussion can help address misunderstandings1.

  • Cultural Competence Training: Providing education about various cultures, values, and communication styles can foster understanding1.

  • Active Listening: Encouraging individuals to listen actively and empathetically to one another, acknowledging differing viewpoints can be beneficial1.

  • Mediation: In cases of severe conflict, a neutral mediator can facilitate discussions and help reach a resolution1

  • https://www.perplexity.ai/search/culture-clash-definition-FK8nLHVtQWKM8aHz1kNOJg

culture clash alvin toffler

Alvin Toffler, a renowned futurist and author, explored the concept of culture clash in his influential work “Future Shock” (1970) and subsequent writings. Toffler argued that rapid technological and social changes were creating a form of cultural disorientation, which he termed “future shock”15.

Key Aspects of Toffler’s Culture Clash Theory

  1. Accelerating Change: Toffler posited that the pace of change was increasing at an unprecedented rate, causing individuals and societies to struggle with adaptation12.

  2. Colliding Waves: In “The Third Wave,” Toffler described societal changes as colliding “waves,” with each wave representing a major shift in civilization24. These waves include:

    • First Wave: Agricultural revolution

    • Second Wave: Industrial revolution

    • Third Wave: Post-industrial society

  3. Technological Impact: Toffler emphasized the role of technology in driving cultural shifts, arguing that technological innovations were reshaping social institutions and individual experiences27.

  4. Transience: The concept of “transience” is central to Toffler’s theory, suggesting that experiences, relationships, and even beliefs were becoming increasingly temporary in nature2.

  5. Psychological Effects: Toffler argued that rapid change could lead to emotional distress and psychological disorientation for individuals and societies37.

Criticisms and Legacy

Some critics argue that Toffler’s approach was deterministic and overly focused on technology as the primary driver of change2. However, his work remains influential, with many of his concepts still relevant in discussions about technological disruption and social change75.

Toffler’s ideas continue to resonate in contemporary debates about the impact of digital technologies, globalization, and rapid social transformations on individuals and societies7

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/culture-clash-alvin-toffler-OWxGLz7IR5e4NhU4s7Pgyg

the aoc feud with border czar described in terms of futureshock

The recent feud between Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (AOC) and Trump’s “border czar” Tom Homan exemplifies the concept of “future shock” as described by Alvin Toffler5. This clash represents the disorientation and stress caused by rapid societal and technological changes, particularly in the realm of immigration policy and enforcement.

The conflict arose when AOC hosted a webinar advising migrants about their rights during ICE encounters13. Homan, representing a more traditional approach to border control, viewed this as potentially impeding law enforcement efforts4. This disagreement highlights the tension between established systems and emerging social awareness, a key aspect of future shock.

The rapid dissemination of information through social media and online platforms, as demonstrated by AOC’s webinar, illustrates the accelerated pace of change that Toffler identified as a primary cause of future shock2. This technological advancement has enabled new forms of civic engagement and education, challenging traditional power structures and enforcement methods.

The heated exchange between AOC and Homan, played out across various media platforms9, further exemplifies the “shattering stress and disorientation” Toffler associated with future shock5. Their conflicting perspectives on immigration law and enforcement reflect broader societal divisions exacerbated by rapid change.

This ongoing feud serves as a microcosm of the larger societal struggles to adapt to changing norms, technologies, and power dynamics – all hallmarks of the future shock phenomenon Toffler described decades ago8.

https://www.perplexity.ai/search/the-aoc-feud-with-border-czar-jeroSQduR4.Snc.LqO2urA

(End Perplexity-AI)

Notes

     Without realizing it, the congresswoman and the border czar find themselves in a spiral of possibilities that extends far beyond just the simple framework of politics and law. If there were a taxonomic structure in cultural evolution available in this precedent setting case, one would be at odds to accept a socio-anthropological perspective to the feud phenomenon would be subordinate to politics-law. 

     What happens in the outcome will affect the future of ICE enforcement at the door of the immigrant, whether the latter decides to open it or not for the former. The only thing standing in the way of that culture clash is the threshold.

(Summary: https://www.perplexity.ai/search/alvin-toffler-s-description-of-yQsBTwaQS8iqXB5D8Vk6.g)

Afterword

     Much to the delight of national media, and the social media peanut gallery as well, it is viewed both with amusement and with indignance, which also reflects the level of ignorance in the culture of where the floor of this bottomless pit of insults lies, at the expense of immigrants caught in the middle. Wasn’t this the reason they left home to come to America in the first place?

     Still, the lack of the socio-anthropologists to enter into the dispute shows the pace at which the expanding universe of culture is just out of reach from their ability to theorize, explain, justify, and represent. Maybe it should be left to the “futurists.”