This piece on Theft and Artistry was actually a very interesting read. It was similar in style to the articles on plagiarism and the Molotov Man that were read last week but presented deeper insight into the topic of originality.
This piece actually examines the effects of cultural appropriation on the artistic industry, in particular, the music industry.
I didn’t actually consider how much of an impact (statement) could be made by using a particular country as a background in a music video. What I found quite interesting was the following quote that was made: “When we’re presented with caricatures of other cultures, she says, it’s easier for people to view them as sub-human”. This was one aspect that I did not actually consider. I didn’t consider that cultural appropriations (or caricatures made of other cultures) could actually contribute to maintaining a cycle of systemic degradation and dehumanization that can act as an enabler for political manipulations.
One can definitely not underestimate the power of the artistic industry especially with those stars who are currently in the limelight. They are the ones who truly hold the power of influence and what comes with that power is en even greater responsibility. However, this does come with a double edged sword as quite often these public figures are more highly scrutinized and held to higher standards. Yet, through this, they do have a chance to create positive change.
There is a difference between theft and artistry but drawing that line of what constitutes appropriation can be quite difficult to navigate. Being mindful of respecting cultures and traditions is certainly important but one must also be careful to not completely blanket ban the incorporation of culture into art. Cultural awareness can actually be heightened through exposure but only when executed in the right way and clearly, this is what the artistic industry needs to pay more attention to.