Response to McCloud’s “Understanding Comics” – Madi Eberhardt

After reading “Understanding Comics,” my entire perspective and awareness on comics has completely changed. Comics are mono-sensory mediums in which are actually very complicated pieces of work. As he mentions when referencing Topffer, that there is this distinction between comic artists not exactly being a writer nor an artist. This made me think of what it truly means to write a comic book as you are combining both an artists traits and writers. I also found it interesting when he explained how we see ourselves in these “mediums” by assigning emotions or certain identities to things where they don’t even necessarily exist. He quotes, “When we abstract an image through cartooning, we’re not so much eliminating details as we are focusing on specific details” (30). Due to the fact that we see our own identity in cartoons for example, it makes them even more attractive to us. Our awareness is then invested into inanimate objects (like our clothes or when driving a car).

Another aspect of the reading that taught me more about comics, is this difference between eastern and western style. In Japanese comics, they tend to focus heavily on realistic backgrounds. This gives more aesthetic and puts the reader really into the situation. It’s quoted that, “Words, pictures, and other icons are the vocabulary of the language called comics” (47). He states that while pictures are received in our minds, the writing is perceived. This was interesting as I had never thought of it in this way. It is all our sense that reveal a fragmented and incomplete world.

Within this book, he closely investigates the setup of comics. He explained how closure (lines around the pictures, etc) allow us to connect moments in comics. There are panels that describe each scene, with action to action being the most popularly used. In relation to time when reading a comic, panels are our general indicator of time and space being divided. The sound and motion of this time depends completely on your frame of mind.








Response to McCloud – Taylah Bland

After reading McCloud’s first four chapters on “Understanding Comics” I have really deepened my sense of awareness, understanding, and appreciation for the art of comics. McCloud provides an in-depth analysis of the basics of comics through a cleverly articulated format. 

The second chapter of the text, “The Vocabulary of Comics” was actually my favorite. I didn’t realize how many different items could be used to evoke different reactions depending on what society has rendered them to represent. I particularly liked the example of the face that was given. It was simply a circle with dashes in the centre to indicate eyes, a nose and a mouth but somehow our brains are able to connect the dots (literally) and signal it as a face. It became impossible to avoid being able to see the face. 

That type of recognition can be extremely powerful and this was further demonstrated through the implementation of symbols or icons. These icons could include a country flag, food, or even a stop sign. What was interesting was just how much was evoked from one simple icon. In taking the stop sign for example, the caption that McCloud used was “not law”. I thought this was quite funny as the first thing I thought of was in actually that you must abide by stopping at the sign. All the sign said was stop, but I had already began to extend upon what the literal meaning of the sign means and I was able to extrapolate more sophisticated information pertaining to its relevance and intended purpose. 

The hope I have for my interactive comic is to use simplistic conventions to convey a really deep and meaningful message. On the face value it may seem overly simplistic or lacking creativity but the longer you interact with the comic you begin to reflect on the deeper meaning that it is trying to convey. I think that is really powerful. 

McCloud also talks a lot about manipulating different mediums through text, icons, sizing, positioning, and also how this can distort a sense of time (Chapter 4) and place. Comics have a power to transform the ways in which we think about certain ideas and topics. They present a very clear picture to an array of audiences to simplify often challenging concepts. This is the hope I have for my comic as I wish to be able to encapsulate an issue of importance in an engaging and simplistic way to increase awareness and accessibility to information. 

McCloud’s text will definitely continue to be a source of inspiration as I continue on in my study of comics. 

Response to Marshall McLuhan – Taylah Bland

I was very intrigued with McLuhan’s article “The Medium Is The Message” as it gave me a unique insight into the way in which we view technology. Quite often we focus on what the internet provides us and the content we receive without really paying attention to medium of delivery. The medium “shapes and controls the scale and form of the human association and action” (152) we often underestimate the power of the medium and the responsibility that comes with it. 

The medium in itself can create unity and divisiveness if exercised in an incorrect way. The example was given of a contrast between America and England. The English rejecting typography for the oral tradition of common law, yet America prided themselves on their use of typography due to its conformist and unifying nature. This made me think that the medium has the capacity to completely distort and change the intended meaning. If one was to write down oral traditions, they may be interpreted completely differently than if they were expressed in an oral way. 

We have a lot of responsibility with the way in which we interact with the medium of our content. We have the potential to reach far reaching audiences and as such the medium that is selected should have as much thought put into it as the thought that goes into the content of the message. 

As McLuhan states “the media is also a powerful weapon with which to clobber other media and other groups” (161). The negatively connoted diction of “clobber” insinuates destruction and is the reality of what happens when both the medium and content that are created are used in a damaging way. We don’t have to look too far on social media sites to see some of the “trolling” and “spam” that floods sites such as Facebook, Twitter, and Instagram. These are examples of using such a powerful medium for the wrong reason. 

After reading the article, I agree with Psychologist C. G. Jung that “no one can shield himself from such an influence” (161). What we need to work on is the way in which we use the medium to maximize the value of our content. One in which we use that methodology for good, rather than for degradation. 

Photoshop Assignment – Madi Eberhardt

Project: Photoshop Collage

Documented By: Madi Eberhardt

Date: February 22nd, 2019

Description: 

I used an image of a laundry mat with black circles for the window of the machine. I then merged the layers of four other landscape photos into the windows of the machine so that it appeared as if the windows looked into places from around the world. The effect makes it seem like you can just peer into other worlds from just a simple place like a laundry mat. I’ve always loved traveling and this photo to me represents this idea of leaving your comfort zone to diving into some unknown world or place.

CSS Exercise 1

Link: http://imanas.shanghai.nyu.edu/~jc8017/HW/index.html

One of the major challenges of this assignment was to position the navigation bar in the same line as the content bar. I was able to accomplish this by encapsulating both the content and navigation div under a single div. Then, I applied the flow on the encapsulating div. The rest of the positioning had to be done by either altering the width and margins.