Response to E.M. Forster – Mingyue Deng

As I read E.M. Forster’s The Machine Stops, I was shocked at the ignorance and conformity people looked for in the universe created by Forster. Since I have just read science fictions such as The Three-Body Problem by Cixin Liu and I have just watched the film The Wandering Earth, I have encountered many descriptions about the underground cities which people would be living in the future when supposedly the surface of the Earth is no longer livable for human beings. These descriptions of underground cities are very similar in characteristics, and there are two which I want to talk about. First of all, these cities all are limiting to people going up to the surface, especially in The Machine Stops when it is totally forbidden. People wear masks or respirators when they go up to the surface because people could not breathe the air, whether true in the case of The Wandering Earth and The Three Body Problem or told by the Book in The Machine Stops. The second similar characteristic in imagining the future underground cities is the artificial space and lighting and comfort created by either the people in the United Earth Government or the Machine. There seems to always be hope in the future even when human beings cannot live where they have always lived.

Then I saw the cruelness of all three pieces and especially The Machine Stops. In the other two pieces I read and watched on my own, people are hopeful and successful until the end. However, in The Machine Stops, I want to return to what I said at the beginning of this response, they were ignorant and self-interested. They are living in a huge bubble created by the Machine and they are never doubting the ways they are living because they are the generations born into this kind of space and living this kind of life. Just like what Kuno said in the work, human beings have lost their sense of sharp thinking and criticism to ignorance and conformity. Throughout the short story, the author repeats phrases like it was told to these people so they follow it. They were all looking for ideas but they never found one interesting idea which is original. I suppose that the Machine was built by some intelligent people who have original ideas, but when I read that they have already died and passed down the books to later generations, I thought the world must be ending fast because people would want to take control of the Machine so they could be more powerful. And this process would then remind me of 1984. However, when I read that the people only learned by parts the entire control system to the Machine, I realized that these people are less intelligent than I think. The reason why I thought that is because when these people are also living in a world where there is only comfort and convenience and they think every other method are stupid when they are not inventing or thinking or believing, they are going to fail at the smallest tasks. In the end, the people who made the Machine and the Book and the underground cities were the thinkers and the inventors, and the next generations after who would only copy and paste the Founding Fathers without new innovations would only be duller and duller in their ways of life.

Response to E.M. Forster – Ta-Ruedee Pholpipattanaphong (Ploy)

“The Machine Stops” by E.M. Forster discusses the relationship between humans and machines. Throughout the price, he portrays a society in which machines took over humanity. Ultimately, it reaches the point where human depends on machines to live, and without machines human will die. It is quite ironic in ways that humans seek to become independent but however, they are the one who allows themselves to depend on non-living objects, machines. It is even more ironic when we consider that those non-living objects were created by them. The sentence, “Cannot you see, cannot all you lecturers see, that it is we that are dying, and that down here the only thing that really lives is the Machine? We created the Machine, to do our will, but we cannot make it do our will” (15) written by E.M Forster really struck me to see that it is our own behaviours that harm our societies, and it is only to mankind that should be blamed. It’s totally ironic that whilst humans struggle to live, machines – created by mankind – live smoothly.

It is all because humans placed machines to a degree that exceeds necessity, resulting in how they “worship the Machine” (11). In the piece, Vashti knows that her son is in danger or even is facing death because of his choice to get rid of and be independent of the machines. She loves her son and cares for her son. But still, she chose to go back to her machines as if the machines are more important to her.

After reading this piece, it came to my realization that if we continue the process of technological dependence, we would soon reach the point where human beings are replaced by machines. And thus, instead of celebrating the significances of mankind, it will give rise to the society composing of the boss – machines and their slaves – humans.