Response to Payne—Alessandra

The usual images of sustainable fashion conjured in the minds of the fashion consumer are brown/rough fabrics, ill-fitting and bland pieces, and generally unfashionable fashion. This is wholly uninspiring to the average consumer, leading them to ignore the sustainable fashion movement altogether. However, in her piece “The Life-Cycle of the Fashion Garment and the Role of Australian Mass Market Designers,” Alice Payne offers several solutions to correct the above assumption about sustainable fashion. Payne is not speaking to the consumers; she is focusing on the possibilities in sustainable design rather than simply blaming the consumer. She uses Australia as a case study, but it is clear that she is optimistic about her results if amplified on a worldwide scale. 

I found her ”Garment use” section the most interesting. I have often mentioned in class the importance of intent behind design in furthering the sustainable fashion movement. When intent is removed from the design process, fashion pieces become disposable. Payne elaborates that in Australia, clothing retailers are beginning to realize the potential of this intent behind design, from designing clothing that doesn’t need to be washed so often to involving “services” with the purchase of a fashion piece. I am also optimistic that this will work worldwide, but fashion companies will not adapt without the demand of a sustainability-conscious consumer. 

Response to Alice Payne – Xiaoyan Kong

When we talk about sustainable fashion in our first class, we discussed a lot of ways that people or the industry can use to make fashion more environmentally friendly and sustainable.  Yet, we didn’t connect all of them together, they are all almost separate with each other, being considered as one single solution. Reading this article written by Alice Payne makes me realize doing good on only one aspect or process is far less than enough. She uses bamboo as an example – from the material property perspective, it belongs to renewable sources and hence sustainable. However, from the product processing side, turning bamboo into fibre needs tons of energy and it does so much pollution. Life-cycle assessment – the tool Payne introduces to us, is a more comprehensive solution. It involves each progress of fashion production, from “fibre (cradle), moving through to textile production, garment design process, manufacture, distribution, retail, use phase and eventual disposal (grave)”. It just reminds me of a commercial application that launched by Infor. It is called the Infor Fashion Product Lifecycle Management (PLM) solution suite. The suite enables integration of all key aspects of product development with the company’s entire supply chain, from line planning to product design, development, procurement, processing, inventory management, customer information and distribution products. Though both Infor and Alice Payne use the same concept of life-cycle, we can see Infor’s intention is helping company making as much money as possible by saving them time then to focus on fashion design, while Payne tries to seek a way that life-cycle solution can exist in mass market to make it fairer and environmentally responsible. There’s no wonder, all businesses have to take profit into account. But it seems people are still not paying enough attention to the non-money part of life-cycle thinking. We still have a lot to work on.

Response to Alice Payne: Hope Myers

I thought this article was very readable and did a good job summarizing all the different points in the cycle and the steps that can be taken for sustainability at each. I’ve hear about mass brands knocking off high fashion designers but one point that I never thought about before was how Australia is a season behind so it can just take the patterns. It also makes me wonder whether there is less of an issue with excessive seasonal consumption in places where the climate is more stable year round. I feel like for me somehow I misplace clothes between seasons or see new trends that I want to try but I feel like if the weather didn’t change that much I wouldn’t buy as many new clothes each season and would wear the ones I have for longer.

For the retail/use side of things one thing I think could help is teaching basic sewing skills or having people in stores to do really basic things. Some fancier places offer tailoring or alterations but I’ve also heard of people saying that they threw away a perfectly useable garment just because they didn’t know how or couldn’t be bothered to sew a button back on. Things like this could reduce a lot of waste and are so easy to teach. One more issue is with the growing digital market people buy a lot of clothes on impulse. I know I’ve bought some things on Taobao that I don’t even end up liking but they’re so cheap that it’s easier to just keep them instead of returning them. Rather than buying cheap clothes they won’t wear people should spend that money buying better quality sustainable clothes.

Week 2: Response to Alice Payne – Ji Hwan Shin

Alice Payne discusses about the different ways the fashion industry in Australia has been implementing sustainable innovations to extend garments’ life-cycle and promote more environmentally friendly trends in the long run. She explains this by discussing how sustainability can be addressed in every aspect of the life-cycle of clothes. From textile production to retail, there are several ways companies can be responsible in dealing with the extraction of natural resources and disposing of products.

What makes me interested the most is the retail aspect of the product life-cycle because I previously believed that companies strived to implement eco-friendly policies during the manufacturing process. But seeing how Target in Australia encourages people to wash their clothes in cold water and let them air dry shows how even during the consumption stage, people can learn how to extend the wear of their clothes. In Uniqlo, customers who purchase over a certain limit can get free tailoring at the store. This shows how companies are focusing on customization to induce customers to take good care of their clothes. I also like the example of Levi’s and H&M discontinuing the practice of sand blasting because of the toxic waste generated from making worn out looking jeans. 

Innovation of course is the surest way of achieving futures goals toward sustainability. ‘Designing light’ to reduce transportation costs, making odor repelling clothing, and ingenious methods of weaving all help to lessen the negative externalities of mass production. I think if more companies implement the cradle to cradle (C2C) model and foster designers who seek to innovate ways of producing textiles can significantly change the direction of fast fashion. Slowing down the methods held for hundreds of years isn’t necessarily a bad thing. We can actually develop new ways of efficiently reforming manufacturing processes.

Week 3 : Reading Response (Nimrah)

Name: Mehr Un Nisa Javed
Professor: Nimrah Syed
Date: 24th Feb ‘ 2019

Title: “The life-cycle of the fashion garment and the role of Australian mass market designers”

Objective: Reading Response

Reading Response:

The main issue raised by the reading was that how the Australian mass market leads to harmful environmental impacts and the possibilities for sustainability in the Australian mass market. After that life-cycle assessment is done to evaluate the impact of of the products produced. After that the speed in the market is analyzed and links it with the fast fashion where the clothes are considered as a disposable commodity. Further, the fibre use is discussed where it can be seen that mostly people prefer to buy the cheaper fibre such as polyester and when in 2010, the prices of cotton rose then the people switched more towards cotton-grade polyester so they could have a cheap substitute. This shows that people care less for the environment and so the demand for natural fibers further decreased because they are very costly to consume. Later, the writer covers all the phases of the garment life cycle such as textile production, garment design, manufacturing, distribution, retail, garment use and Disposal, reuse and cradle-to-cradle alternatives. In all these phases mainly the environmental impacts are assessed.

I really liked this reading because it is like a business cycle where are the phases are discussed which would make the readers more conscious about their choices and most importantly, it creates awareness amongst the producers/retailers who would go through each stage and could possibly minimize the harmful impact by ethical practices. However, at the same time they would be challenged by doing all ethical and environmental friendly practices. For example, a retailer or producer could get at loss because since he would be doing everything in a more suitable way the he would need to increase the prices which would in turn affect the consumers base.

Overall, this reading had some great lessons but I believe, it is still quite difficult to implement the theory into reality.