Week 2: Accidentally Sustainable? Sophie Woodward | Gabriel Chi

Sophie Woodward’s “Accidentally Sustainable?” delves into the how important consumer behaviour and tendencies are in relation to sustainable practices, and how ethnological research is the key into understanding such trends. 

When reading the paper, something that stood out to me the most was the “Accidentally Sustainable” example, specifically the jeans. Woodward describes how,  “Specifically in relationship to jeans, people were found to have highly personalised and long-term relationships to particular pairs, therefore not always falling in synch with the rhythms of rapidly changing fashions.” I resonated very strongly with the quote, as in the past years, I had gained quite a strong interest in the denim industry, and specifically the denim fanatics which took the garments very seriously. 

The denim jean’s allure, as alluded by Woodward, is due to it’s longevity, and its personalization. As the wearer continues to wear the same garment over the period of several years, the jeans themselves become personalized and custom to their owner. Additionally, the denim jean has gained quite the cult status within fashion, where denim fanatics age their pairs of jeans for years before washing them, all in order to personalize their own pairs. 

I specifically think this strong personalization and customization should continue to spread in other types of clothing, and are one of the key methods to promote sustainability. By targeting certain consumer tendencies and human behaviour, we can drastically change the presence of sustainability within the fashion industry.

Week 1: Response to Edelkoort and Fletcher | Gabriel Chi

Li Edelkoort’s “Anti-Fashion: A Manifesto for the Next Decade”

In her talk, Li Edelkoort discusses the issues with the current state of the fashion industry, mainly targeting its antiquated structures. Edelkoort states several times throughout the talk, that the industry as a whole, still thinks in a 20th century perspective. Fashion Institutions and Schools are not providing students with workspaces, ateliers, and education about textiles. This lack of education for students, and also the consumers, leaves them clueless on the subject of sustainable textiles and fabrics, perpetuating the endless cycle of wasted and unsustainable garments. 

However, to combat this issue, Edelkoort specifically offers ideas to improve and modernize the industry. For example, For manufacturers and designers to begin labeling the origin of their garments, and for brands to share more information with consumers about the resources they utilize during the manufacturing process. By enriching the consumers with useful information about sustainability, they can also begin independently making conscious efforts to watch what they purchase. As Edelkoort stresses, there needs to be more interactivity for the consumers, different and new ways to market, educate and enrich the customer’s knowledge about their purchases. 

This type of concept reminded me of places such as farmers markets, where each product has an origin story, linked to a farmer or a manufacturer, and etc. By putting a face behind the product, it humanizes the product itself, forcing consumers to put more thought into what they purchase. 

Kate Fletcher’s “Slow Fashion: An Invitation for Systems Change”

In Kate Fletcher’s paper, She describes the rise of the “fast” and “slow” fashion movements, and both of their social and ecological effects on the world. Beginning with fast fashion, Fletcher describes the mass produced, environmentally harming process, as a tool for companies to quickly and easily cash in on consumer’s money. As Fletcher states, “Fast fashion is fashion shaped not by speed but by a set of business practices focused on achieving continual economic growth; the most universally accepted goal in the world”. Mainly driven by monetary value and economic growth, companies of the fast fashion industry care less about the environment and sustainability, rather, the different ways in which to continually sell the same product over and over, for seasons on end. 

Additionally, the fast fashion industry have also contributed to the devaluing of clothing.  As stated by Fletcher, “Big-box” retailers create a dynamic that prioritizes cheapness, mass availability, and volume purchasing above all else and that forces smaller producers, who cannot compete on price alone, out of business.” By setting the standard for clothing price so low, consumers will value them less, making them easier to dispose of, contributing to large amounts of un-recyclable trash. Doing some additional research, I discovered that, according to the Fashion Industry Waste Statistics by EDGE, “Consumers throw away shoes and clothing [versus recycle], an average of 70 pounds per person, annually.” Combined with the large amounts of textile waste and clothing, all of these materials end up in trash dumps or landfills, un-recyclable and unable to be repurposed.