The Uncertainty of Documentarism

By the “unbroken belief” of the documentary form, Steyerl refers to the traditional notion that documentary films are objective representations of reality. This belief assumes that the camera captures and presents the world as it is, without any manipulation or interpretation by the filmmaker. However, Steyerl argues that this belief is increasingly challenged in the age of digital media, where images and information can be easily manipulated and distorted.

Steyerl’s argument is that truth is not an absolute, objective concept, but rather a socially constructed one that is shaped by power relations, ideology, and cultural context. In other words, what is considered to be true depends on who is telling the story and for what purpose.

When it comes to fiction, the relationship between truth and fiction is complex. While fiction may not be based on actual events or people, it can still convey important truths about the human experience or social realities. Fictional narratives can explore complex themes and issues in a way that non-fictional accounts may not be able to. At the same time, fiction can also be used to manipulate or distort reality, especially when it is presented as fact.

In this way, both truth and fiction can inform each other. Documentary filmmakers can use fictional techniques to convey certain truths or explore complex themes, while fictional storytellers can draw inspiration from real-life events and experiences to create more nuanced and impactful narratives. Ultimately, it is up to the audience to critically engage with the media they consume and determine what is true and what is not.

The authenticity and representation of truth in the media we consume on a daily basis is significant because it shapes our understanding of the world around us. When we rely on the media to inform us about current events, social issues, and cultural trends, we expect the information presented to be accurate and truthful. However, as Hito Steyerl points out in her article, the idea of objective truth is becoming increasingly complicated in the age of digital media, where images and information can be easily manipulated and distorted. As consumers of media, it is important for us to be critical and discerning of the information presented to us, and to seek out multiple perspectives in order to form a more nuanced understanding of the truth.

The role of a live broadcast is to provide real-time coverage of events as they unfold. Live broadcasts have the potential to provide a more authentic representation of truth because they are unedited and unfiltered, and offer a sense of immediacy and urgency. However, live broadcasts can also be subject to bias and manipulation, as the journalists and broadcasters who are reporting on the events may have their own perspectives and agendas. As consumers of live broadcasts, it is important for us to critically evaluate the information presented, and to seek out additional sources in order to form a more comprehensive understanding of the truth.