Month: May 2016 (Page 2 of 3)

Final Project

Last summer, I stumbled across a job opportunity to work for a startup website nestled within the IT department of a new real-estate investment and development company named HAP, located in Midtown. Having been unfamiliar with real estate and just about anything corporate, I was not fully affiliated nor understood the company until I was commissioned to produce promotional images and video by proximity that my office for the website was within theirs. I was asked to visit various construction sites and cut together short updates regarding how far along the building processes were for each, accompanied by the site supervisor. I created somewhere around 8 videos over the course of a few months, and finally I noticed a pattern. Out of all ten of the projects currently being developed by HAP, excluding the new HAP Tower in Jersey City, six were located in East Harlem, relatively close to the subway in residential areas largely lower-middle and middle class. I had been reading about gentrification in Harlem since the start of college, and I had not realized that I was seeing an intermediary process of displacement and gentrification right in front of me, even if it was far along for many years. Through the classes I took, including one in which I produced a website about Harlem and it’s history/democratic shifts and another in which I produced a small documentary interviewing long time residents of Williamsburg and seeing their perspective on their rapidly changing neighborhood. Through these experiences, I had grown to oppose gentrification, yet only a few months prior I was documenting and helping facilitate the very process.

For many reasons, including the defunding of the website startup, I left HAP, well aware of the precautions legally to me sharing the work I produced for them. I never received any compensation for my work and had to sign release forms stating that HAP was the only entity allowed to publish the content I had made for them, so as many of my college-age New York colleagues would understand, I got, for lack of a better word, “interned.” Yet I was hungry to learn more, I felt my morals had been compromised. What I discovered all this time later is how cryptic, bureaucratic, and nuanced gentrification is as a process and how difficult it is to pinpoint exactly where to affect positive change within neighborhoods experiencing it. After all, I am a student at a university responsible for helping gentrify and monopolize entire sectors of lower Manhattan, including the East Village regarding the demolition of St. Ann’s Church despite numerous community protests against the action. I am already contributing through my tuition.

Gentrification has become a major subject of discontent and discussion within the past 25 years, especially in New York City, where neighborhoods like the East Village and Wiliamsburg, once home to lower income housing, have now become some of the most expensive places to live in the world. Ask many born-and-raised New Yorkers and they will tell you that it is the worst thing ever to have happened to the city. The concept of gentrification is rather simple, investment companies purchase plots of land inexpensively within neighborhoods that at the time are lower income. Once the surrounding areas become more populated and there becomes a demand for wealthier people to find housing, they move into the lower income neighborhoods that have essentially have been paved for them, forcing the original residents of the neighborhood out and displacing thousands of people. Take Harlem as a case study, a neighborhood rich in diversity and home to a large African-American population. From 2000-2005, 32,500 African-Americans were displaced from Harlem and were replaced by approximately 22,800 white residents, and the number has been growing ever since. With real estate becoming more and more upper-class in New York City, developers and investment companies are setting their sights on other neighborhoods, the next in line is El Barrio, or East Harlem, one of the most diverse places in New York and a historical home to a true melting pot of cultures and ethnicities including Puerto Rican, African American, Mexican, Italian, and Dominican. East Harlem

Gentrification is a self-aware process, we want to know where to point fingers, but who exactly is to blame? We can criticize the residents of the buildings themselves, but did every resident collectively organize this effort? No, but there is something to be said about how it’s usually rich, whiter people who gentrify neighborhoods, especially in New York City. But why? Well, because they are the only people who can afford the rising costs, as in Harlem, where the typical price for an apartment is over $458 per square foot. This is bound to happen when years prior real estate developers and investment platforms purchase the same properties, waiting for the opportune moment to turn it into an apartment complex, or sell it to Whole Foods. Take Bedford-Stuyvesant in Brooklyn, where the median sales price for a home jumped from $455,000 in the second quarter of 2013 to $621,000 in 2014. This is largely due in part by organizations like CityShares, multi-million dollar investment platforms that are “seeking to capitalize on the neighborhood’s sharp growth” by buying up large sums of land and constructing them into whatever turns profit best, and a city already as overpopulated as New York, housing is an ever growing demand.

For this project, I decided to revisit the construction sites in East Harlem that HAP is currently developing and photograph them, hoping that documenting the current process and surrounding neighborhoods can provide a means for an audience to see what is going on and hopefully feel inspired to do something about it. I took inspiration from several Magnum and VII photographers with projects and works in New York City, including Elliott Erwitt, Bruce Gilden, Richard Kalvar, and Ron Haviv. I did not set out to pull a certain style from each photographer as much as try and attempt to capture images of a subject that is aesthetically uninteresting in hopes to inspire. Thinking especially of Haviv’s, I tried to play with a tone of complacency, hoping to turn what seems like a mundane occurrence in New York or any major city into something informative, hoping they might ignite action.

Ultimately, HAP is not a major development company, and have plenty of legal issues they are currently fighting in regards to their projects. They are not the face of gentrification nor are they leading it, but it is the myriad of groups like them that are helping force lower income residents out of their neighborhoods. To actually make a difference, it requires action, and solidarity with local efforts, such as the East Harlem Preservation and GOLES in the Lower East Side. Supporting local businesses also is has a large impact, as many businesses lose grounds to larger corporations and chains as neighborhoods drastically shift. Gentrification is not a natural process, it ruins communities and forces people out of their homes, and to help hinder such an elusive process, the support of local efforts comes first and foremost.

EL BARRIO

Photography & The Stigma Surrounding Mental Illness

Shiny marble tabletop

Aisle in library

Green outdoor table with red wall in background

Stairs leading down

Trees and cement park benches

Office door with pamphlets and chair in front of it.

Desk with medication on it

instagram.com/lookatme.ntalhealth

The medium of photography has the capacity to be extremely personal and entirely honest. Unfortunately, the medium is also able to be dishonest; images hold more power than we consciously assume, and they can easily perpetuate stereotypes and stigmas within our society without complete intent. With regards to mental illness, a powerful stigma exists in all aspects of our society. As Peter Byrne points out in Advances in Psychiatric Treatment in 2000, “Mental illness, despite centuries of learning and the ‘Decade of the Brain,’ is still perceived as an indulgence, a sign of weakness” (Byrne 1). There are many complex reasons as to why this stigma still exists today, regardless of the advanced knowledge the science world now knows about mental illness. Photography plays an arguably significant role in the preservation and extension of this stigma; more often than not, photos of extreme, isolating images are used to represent the whole of mental illnesses in the media, advertising, and even so-called awareness campaigns. This stereotypical, false representation of mental illness is not only unfair, but also truly detrimental towards any attempts to break down the social stigma surrounding the mental health community.

Photography and mental illness come together in a large, positive way in the work of Ashley Gilbertson. He is of course renowned for his work with preserving the memory of veterans, many of whom died due to poorly diagnosed or poorly treated mental illnesses after returning home from war. Gilbertson himself openly speaks about his personal encounter with Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) after he returned from covering the war in Iraq (Mccauley). His ability to identify with this mental illness undoubtedly heightens his ability to photograph it truthfully.

In 2013, Gilbertson photographed Stacy Pearsall, a fellow conflict photographer who was in the midst of coping with PTSD and suicidal thoughts after having travelled imbed in Iraq and Afghanistan. The photos are stunning; they show Pearsall smoking a pipe in the woods behind her house and tending to her horse outside her barn. They are very high quality images, but the content is overwhelmingly average. Pearsall does not look incredibly sad, nor incredibly happy. She simply exists in her personal normalcy. Herein lies the beauty of these photos: Gilbertson was able to capture a woman with a mental illness just acting like a human being.

This series of photos was the inspiration for my project. I have personally dealt with mental illness in family members around me growing up, and within myself. I also feel personally affected by the stigma – I ignored the social anxiety and depression that shaped my life for as long as possible. I unknowingly partook in “self-stigmatization,” which is accepting a stigma to be true and then turning it on oneself, usually in the form of shame (Corrigan 485). On this topic, Byrne again ponders:

The question arises as to just what all this shame and secrecy is about. Negative cultural sanction and myths combine to ensure scapegoating in the wider community. The reality of discriminatory practices supplies a very real incentive to keep mental health problems a secret. Patients who pursue the secrecy strategy and withdraw have a more insular support network.

All of the stigmatizing in our society is supported in the photographs and portrayals we see representing mental illness. In a study of how mental illness is shown in television, a study found only 3% of characters to be openly impacted by an illness, and of that small percentage, “the mentally ill were most likely to commit violence and to be victimized (Signorielli). Additionally, “the mentally ill characters were less likely to be employed outside the home, and if so employed were likely to be seen as failures” (Signorielli). In advertisements that deal in some way with mental illness – whether it be for medication to treat symptoms, a suicide hotline promotion, or just a general good-will ad about reaching out to those in need – the illness is always portrayed in the extreme. A dark, depressed man curled up in the fetal position, meaning depression. A woman with her face in her hands, hair frazzled, meaning anxiety. These images are difficult to relate to for someone without these illnesses, and they may even be difficult to relate to for someone with these illnesses – photographs that dramatize and even exaggerate certain characteristics of mental illness further the distance between “the mentally healthy” and “the mentally ill,” prolong the tendency to “other” those who suffer from an illness beyond their control, extend the cycle of shame and fear and secrecy, and perpetuate the stigma surrounding mental illness.

With both this and the refreshingly more pleasant and “normal” work done by Ashley Gilbertson in mind, my project became an attempt to capture, basically, a boring day in the life of someone with social anxiety. I based the style of my photography on Jessica Dimmock’s series of photos on uninsured Americans – she used low-resolution, almost grainy imagery to show a woman’s struggle to receive cancer treatment without health insurance. I loved the way the images looked, and as I was only working with the camera on an iPhone 5S, the idea of “low-res” was particularly appealing.

None of my photos have people in them, and that was a conscious decision. Thinking through the biggest day-to-day struggle for me and my anxiety, I felt that finding a place to sit is always the most challenging. Having spoken to other people with similar anxieties, this seems to be common – it can be very stressful to either sit surrounded by other people or sit alone; nothing ever feels ideal. So, the majority of my images deal with seating in some capacity. One shows the outside of a therapist’s office, which is just a regular office in the Liberal Studies building; one shows medicine mixed in on a bookshelf. I created an Instagram account for this project and uploaded my photos through there, mimicking Dimmock’s style through filtering each photo in the same way. I felt a social media account would be ideal to present these bland, fairly boring photos – through social media, we are expected to present our best, most idealized self to the world. This only adds to the capacity and tendency to be secretive and ashamed of one’s true feelings and struggles.

I know I am not a good photographer and I certainly do not claim to be one. I had a strong motivation and idea behind my project, and I carried out the visual side as best I could. What I hope is conveyed through this project, even a little bit, is that “normal” means so many different things to so many different people. Someone with a mental illness has a different “normal” than someone without one, but that does not make them any less of a person. Portrayals of mental illness in photography and the media only make this more difficult for people to see; the stigma surrounding mental illness will not break down until people are able to see one another not as “other,” but as fellow human beings.

Works Cited

Byrne, Peter. “Stigma of Mental Illness and Ways of Diminishing It.” BJPsych Advances, 06 Jan. 2000. Web. 06 May 2016.

Corrigan, Patrick. “Structural Levels of Mental Illness Stigma and Discrimination.” Schizophrenia Bulletin. Oxford Journals, n.d. Web. 04 May 2016.

Dimmock, Jessica. “America’s Uninsured.” VII Photo Archive. VII Photo, 2007. Web. 02 May 2016.

Gilbertson, Ashley. “Military Suicide.” VII Photo Archive. VII Photo, 2014. Web. 03 May 2016.

McCauley, Adam. “Overexposed: A Photographer’s War With PTSD.” The Atlantic. Atlantic Media Company, 20 Dec. 2012. Web. 06 May 2016.

Signorielli, Nancy. “The Stigma of Mental Illness on Television.” Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media 33.3 (2009): n. pag. Taylor & Francis Online. Web. 03 May 2016.

Homepage

 

Empowerment of College Women & the Everyday

Succelents in small pots with words "empowerment of college women & the everyday" above

collage of woman in in dark clothing

collage of woman in front of laptop

collage of woman reading book

Women’s Empowerment through the Everyday

1. Ivory Miniatures

What should I do with your strong, manly, spirited Sketches, full of Variety & Glow? — How could I possibly join them on to the little bit (two Inches wide) of Ivory on which I work with so fine a Brush, as produces little effect after much labour? —Jane Austen

Often, many critics of Austen’s words, originally written to her nephew, Edward, improperly cite her words as a way to portray a deprecation of “female” writing as suitable or accommodating to the expectations of the female gender (Leffel). Her stories of young women, of love, of courtship, and femininity—these seem to represent her succumbing to the expectations put on women in literature. However, a good look at her writing reveals “a dazzling array of experiments with literary form and genre… [that are] filled with rebellious, transgressive heroines who steal, murder, elope, binge, and booze” and notably radical content that extends far beyond the demarcated field of literature in which women in her era were expected to remain (Leffel). Austen “playfully skewers generic conventions and forces the reader to re-think customary constructions of the novel” and miniaturizes the “picturesque” genre through an empowerment of the typical, expected, everyday topics. She uses heroines “who boldly and unapologetically flaunts gender boundaries, social codes, and even laws…[challenging] her era’s stifling restrictions on women’s bodies and minds at the same time that she questions exactly what constitutes a ‘novel’” (Leffel). She takes the “everyday” woman, her everyday settings and the typical representation of such, in order to comment upon “gendered conventions and social and political implications that this genre in particular—and the novel more generally—normatively assumes” (Leffel). Through her writing and use of satire of the expected tropes in women’s writing, Austen empowers the everyday notions of “femininity” and transforms them into platforms of growth and strength. 

2. The Ethics of Seeing

Susan Meiselas, a Magnum photographer, empowers in a medium different from Austen’s—through photography. As a lover of anthropology, Meiselas shares an intrigue of the human condition, constantly searching for meaning within the people she captures. She often speaks about the “ethics of seeing,” which “involves connecting, engaging, and feeling compassion for your subjects” as a way into truly brining value to a photo (“The Ethics of Seeing”). By connecting with the photo’s story and context, viewers are pushed to extend themselves out into the world and explore overarching themes. The particular photograph that I connected with and used to push myself into the direction of my project was taken in Monimbo, Nicaragua, in 1979, while she was documenting the country’s treacherous revolution. In this photo, a woman, in an eye-catching red dress, pushes a dead body, wrapped up and tied down to a wooden cart. More time and research with this photo led me to the following facts: the woman is 14 years old, and the dead body is her husband. Meiselas represents her powerfully, in a bold dress, holding up the dead body. To me, this photo portrayed the great hand women have had and continue to have in holding up history. Through this photo, I went beyond the story behind the woman and the dead body and grasped onto the potential symbolic implications of this depiction: the concept of strong women. With this idea in mind, I look into some more of Meiselas’ other work, particularly her work on carnival strippers.

3. Candid Representation

In Carnival Strippers (1972-1975), her first major work, Meiselas, without eroticizing or sexualizing, captures the raw reality of the lives of “women who performed striptease for small town carnivals in New England, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina” (Meiselas). Overcoming the stigma and potential preconceived biases that could easily have been attached to her work on women who hold jobs that are not respected in society, she candidly—and truthfully—observed their situation. Using both photographs and interviews, Meiselas captured these women on stage and backstage, and “what is revealed is that, behind the curtain, the dancers are essentially workers. Taking a few minutes off, they are resting, cleaning up, smoking” (English). She shows the uncompromising truth of their lives which are not always about being sex icons. She documents their everyday, and in this, like Austen, Meiselas empowers their efforts to make a living the best they could within a “seedy” world. She emphasizes the voices of these women and challenges the societal conventional confines that aim to demean and weaken the strength of women in such jobs.

4. My Project

Through these three lenses, combining the idea of empowerment through the rawness of the everyday and the concept of “holding up” history, I found myself focusing on a subject that was real—and close—to me: women in college. Through photosets of my friend, Sam, in different settings, holding different things, I strived to paint a few different ways in which women in college can be empowered in the everyday, the “ordinary,” through the ivory miniatures of their daily lives. Like Meiselas, I wanted to take advantage of the illustrative, narrative quality that photographs embrace. In order to paint a tangible depiction of female empowerment through the everyday, I decided to use platform of the photo collage. Through the combining of photos that capture the whole body, the hand, the act of holding up and object, I created a fuller representation of the empowerment of women through everyday concepts.

I wanted to explore the empowerment of women without having to romanticize them, to portray strong women in ordinary life, rather than as superheroes or goddesses. Thus, I created three photosets, titled Sword, Shield, and Armor; each one signifying one way in which the everyday, the ordinary, the usual, gives power to women in college.

A play on the phrase, “the pen is mightier than the sword,” Sword portrays how expression, the concept of writing, acts as a tool for women in college to not only express themselves but speak up. Particularly in an era of technology and internet, sharing your writing has become incredibly simple. Through blogs, diaries, journals—entities often associated with the female experience and popular among women in college—we are encouraged to and hold the authority to share the female voice which is much less prevalent in mainstream news, media, and literature. By “holding up” our pens, women garner the propensity to be heard, to create, to use writing as a tool for social change and equality; we strike against the trends in our world—in literature, journalism, and influential schools of thought that are charged with the masculine experience. Through the power of the written word, she speaks up for her strength, her belief, her capabilities.

Armor focuses on what women choose to wear and fights the stigma around the phrase, “dressed to be seen.” Taken at Washington Square Park, full of people who come to see and to be seen, I spurn the idea that women are objects of entertainment and dress for others. Beyond deconstructing the stigma around how women dress, how they should dress, and how their clothes label them, I want to reject the stigma around the idea of presentation, of showing off. Through their clothes—accessories, makeup—women not only express themselves but are empowered to use her the clothes she holds up with her body as a demonstration of the beauty of herself, her style, her woman-ness. Instead of being shackled by labels, women dress in their “armor” against the demarcation of the identity of a woman based on her clothes. The way she chooses to present herself empowers her in her self-expression, her presentation of herself to the world, allowing her to not be shaken by attacks against her identity. She is strong in who she is and she shows this through the clothes she chooses to wear each day.

The last photoset, Shield, represents how college women empower themselves through knowledge and education. With intelligence and wisdom, women can stay informed and well-educated on the workings of the world in order to fight against ignorance, injustice, and inequality. Through education, women are empowered to not only take on influential, powerful positions in the workforce, the government, the society, but also protect—to shield—themselves from further discrimination and patronization. Education equates to independence. Through the act of learning, women garner skillsets to help them thrive and support themselves in the world, instead of falling into the molds society expects us to fall into. Through her education, she harnesses the power to expand in a world that wants her to stay still.

Overall, through my project, I depict women empowerment, as a movement that has nothing to do with hierarchy, putting women over men. The primary objective of feminism— is about urging women to believe in their capabilities and identities as living beings who are capable of immense strength and creativity. As Mary Wollstonecraft states, in A Vindication of the Rights of Woman, “I do not wish them [women] to have power over men; but over themselves.”

Works Cited (and Consulted)

Austen-Leigh, William, and Richard Arthur Austen-Leigh. Jane Austen, Her Life and Letters, a Family Record. New York: Russell & Russell, 1965. Print.

English, Deirdre. Stripped Bare: Nude Girls and Naked Truth.” Carnival Strippers. By Susan Meiselas. Steidl: Steidl, Gerhard Druckerei und Verlag, 2003. 153-9. Print.

The Ethics of Seeing. Perf. Susan Meiselas. San Francisco Museum of Modern Art. San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, n.d. Web.

Harrison, Jim. “A Lens on History.” Harvard Magazine. Harvard Magazine Inc, 19 Oct. 2010. Web. 06 May 2016.

Leffel, John C.  “Jane Austen’s Miniature ‘Novel’: Gender, Politics and Form in The Beautiful Cassandra.”  Persuasions 32 (2010): 184-95.

Meiselas, Susan. “Susan Meiselas Photographer.” Carnival Strippers. Magnum Photos, 1972-1975. Web. 06 May 2016.

“Portrait Miniature.” Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, n.d. Web. 06 May 2016.

Seymour, Tom. “Susan Meiselas: Carnival Strippers.” British Journal of Photography. Aptitude Media Ltd., 23 Jan. 2015. Web. 06 May 2016.

Todd, Janet.  “Ivory Miniatures and the Art of Jane Austen.”  British Women’s Writing in the Long Eighteenth Century: Authorship, Politics and History.  Ed. Jennie Batchelor and Cora Kaplan.  New York: Palgrave, 2005.  76-97.

Wollstonecraft, Mary. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: An Authoritative Text, Backgrounds, the Wollstonecraft Debate, Criticism. New York: Norton, 1988. Print.

Observation on Interconnections

Throughout this semester, I have noticed an overwhelming reoccurrence of the theme of agency. Agency both in regards to photojournalists, as well as their subjects. Our discussions on the topic in regards to the bodies of work of photojournalists have brought about many issues, two I found most notable were misrepresentation and exploitation. What I recognized is how vitally necessary it is for photographers to have a strong understanding and keen eye to a world foreign to them, and this must manifest itself in their images. Steve McCurry’s India exhibit and the critical reactions to it made me realize how even an aesthetically beautiful body of work that appears innocent and celebratory of a culture can really be one-sided and misrepresentative of the current people and socio-political/economic status of a place. Some discussions and photographers that come to mind are James Nachtwey’s coverage of Sudan famine and Ron Haviv’s work in the Balkan Conflict regarding human rights violations and war crimes.

Often times the photographs we discussed resulted in positive change, whether that be aid or judicial action, but also had a counter side, promoting stereotypes or helping spread fear. Ultimately, I believe that being a photojournalist is an incredibly difficult job that requires keen attention to the nuances and sensitivities of the situations being photographed. When analyzing photography, it is critical to be aware of not only who is in the frame, but who is not as well, and from what perspective is this story or event being told and documented. The more critical and aware of these issues that the audiences of photojournalism are the more photographers consider this in their work, as the relationship between photographer and press are symbiotic in many ways. I will continue to have a critical eye to the role of agency in regards to the photographs I see, and I hope to come to an even greater understanding of the various aspects agency plays in photojournalism.

The Economics Of Food Inequality, And Community Gardens in NYC

Go to this site!

http://msj3328.wix.com/foodnyc

After coming across Starved for Attention, I began thinking about how to bring about change without asking for donations. Something that we talked about a lot during the discussion about Starved for Attention was the site’s use of a petition. We came to the conclusion that the petition was a good idea, but some parts of the website were not entirely convincing enough (i.e. the amount of content on the site, stereotypes of women and children) to prompt a viewer to enter their name into a petition and support their cause.

For my final project, I was inspired to tackle the idea of hunger in New York City. Like Starved for Attention, I thought that creating a site that ultimately encourages users to sign a petition would be an effective way to present a problem, and a call to action. I then realized that impoverished around the world tend to grow their own foods, despite having little to no money. The opposite is true in New York City. The more I thought about it, the more I understood that people living in poverty in New York City are more likely to buy unhealthy and nutritionally lacking fast food rather than fresh, pure foods. That is because seemingly basic items, like tomatoes, lettuce, radishes, etc. can be considered luxury items, and a privilege if one is able to afford them.

The cost of living in New York is excessively high. According to the Council for Community and Economic Research, groceries in New York cost between 28% and 39% more than the national average (Wallace). To that end, New York City sees elevated levels of poverty. In 2015, New York City reported an 18.3% poverty rate, compared to statewide poverty rate of 15.9% (NYSCAA). With necessities like food costing significantly more than the rest of the country, and considering the poverty rate in New York City, I wanted to explore the cost of food in New York City and try to find a solution to help those of low socioeconomic statuses to be able to attain healthier foods. Clearly, those who are impoverished are not doing anything wrong when they buy fast foods. But for a dollar in New York City, one could buy either an entire meal at McDonald’s, or a single, raw vegetable at a market—if that.

At first, I created a website to demonstrate the price of food in New York. I attempted to contrast food that can be bought at different price points, such as $1.00 pizza and McDonald’s, versus a Russ & Daughter’s lox and bagel board, or farmer’s market vegetables. For the sake of my own aesthetic style and also to dignify the food at all price points, I attempted to make each photo look as appealing to the viewer as possible.

Once I created that, I had decided that I proved a point, but in emulating Starved for Attention, I needed a potential solution to the issue and some call to action. I immediately thought that community gardens placed in empty lots in low-income neighborhoods would not only help to beautify the city, but would also help to educate and empower people who may not be able to afford fresh foods. Similarly, community gardens are sustainable, and would ultimately save its residents money.

In an NPR podcast titled, There Goes The Neighborhood, an organization called Arts East New York had created art installations in an empty lot, which served to educate the community and bring people together. This is exactly my intent for advocating the development of community gardens. However, the lot mentioned in the podcast was taken over by developers under Mayor DeBlasio’s 80/20 affordable housing project.

This development program, titled, the Mandatory Inclusionary Housing program creates new buildings (often in low income neighborhoods) that guarantee a certain percentage of housing to be allocated for low-income buyers. While this is a great idea in theory, the podcast mentions that many of these new buildings are going up in areas where gentrification is happening. To that, if predominantly young, well-off residents move into these buildings and gentrify the area, this will create bigger disparities in the community, and original residents will continue to struggle. We can see this through the opening of “high end” grocery stores like Whole Foods, which cater to a much higher price point than many can afford.

As a result, I decided that my call to action would be to petition Mayor DeBlasio. While his development plan has been approved by the city council, the goal of my website is to convince him to allocate a certain percentage of lots in low income neighborhoods to be developed as community gardens.

In order to convince website visitors to sign the petition, I’ve also included two resources that demonstrate how to create a community garden. The first, called Urban Reviewer, is an interactive map created by 596 Acres, a nonprofit aiming to create community spaces in New York’s empty lots. This feature could be used to demonstrate the number of empty lots in New York City, but could also encourage viewers to find an empty lot near them. Additionally, I provided a link to an article that explains how to start a community garden in New York City. It attempts to make the process easy. Ena McPherson, a woman who works at two community gardens in New York, states, “You don’t need money to start [a] garden, you just need to get yourself hooked up with the [city] agencies, the resources out there to get you started” (Evelly).

In the end, I hope that my website serves as a good starting off point for people to begin thinking about the benefits of a community garden. I think that my choice of digital format is necessary in presenting multiple issues. The photos that I took for this project are only a starting point. Through a well-organized, visual experience, I would hope that the simplicity of the website that I created would ultimately help to convince people to sign the petition.

 

Works Cited:

http://www.starvedforattention.org/

 

https://smartasset.com/mortgage/what-is-the-cost-of-living-in-new-york-city (Wallace).

 

http://nyscommunityaction.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/2015-Poverty-Report-w-50th-logos-for-online.pdf  (NYSCAA).

 

http://www.wnyc.org/shows/neighborhood/

 

http://www1.nyc.gov/site/planning/plans/mih/mandatory-inclusionary-housing.page

 

http://www.urbanreviewer.org/#map=12/40.7400/-74.0012&sidebar=plans

 

http://www.fastcoexist.com/3038089/mapping-new-yorks-vacant-lots-to-use-them-to-create-a-more-vibrant-city

 

https://www.dnainfo.com/new-york/20140924/astoria/how-you-can-turn-new-york-citys-vacant-lots-into-community-gardens (Evelly).

 

 

 

TAXI GARAGES

STYLE MANAGEMENT CO.

Style Management Co., W 44th between 10th and 11th Ave

Style Management Co., W 44th between 10th and 11th Ave

Style Management Co., W 44th between 10th and 11th Ave

Style Management Co., W 44th between 10th and 11th Ave

Style Management Co., W 44th between 10th and 11th Ave

Style Management Co., W 44th between 10th and 11th Ave

Style Management Co., W 44th between 10th and 11th Ave

Style Management Co., W 44th between 10th and 11th Ave

Style Management Co., W 44th between 10th and 11th Ave

Style Management Co., W 44th between 10th and 11th Ave

Style Management Co., W 44th between 10th and 11th Ave

Style Management Co., W 44th between 10th and 11th Ave

NYC STAR AUTO REPAIR

NYC Star Auto Repair - W 47th between 10th and 11th ave

NYC Star Auto Repair – W 47th between 10th and 11th ave

Sayed - works at NYC Star Auto Repair

Sayed – works at NYC Star Auto Repair

Cashier Office at NYC Star Auto Repair

Cashier Office at NYC Star Auto Repair

NYC Star Auto Repair - W 47th between 10th and 11th ave

NYC Star Auto Repair – W 47th between 10th and 11th ave

NYC Star Auto Repair - W 47th between 10th and 11th ave

NYC Star Auto Repair – W 47th between 10th and 11th ave

NYC Star Auto Repair - W 47th between 10th and 11th ave

NYC Star Auto Repair – W 47th between 10th and 11th ave

ABACAR - mechanic at NYC Star Auto Repair

ABACAR – mechanic at NYC Star Auto Repair

Abdul - works at NYC Star Auto Rpair

Abdul – works at NYC Star Auto Rpair

NYC Star Auto Repair - W 47th between 10th and 11th ave

NYC Star Auto Repair – W 47th between 10th and 11th ave

NYC Star Auto Repair - W 47th between 10th and 11th ave

NYC Star Auto Repair – W 47th between 10th and 11th ave

Augustine - Taxi Driver

Augustine – Taxi Driver

Augustine - Taxi Driver

Augustine – Taxi Driver

Observation on Interconnections – Searles

I noticed a trend among some of the photographers that we discussed this semester, such as viewing photography of a means, rather than an end, for social change. Often, these photographers have goals besides simply taking and displaying their photos. For them, in varying degrees, photography is just a tool is used to uncover injustices, tell untold stories, and/or make changes in the world.

This is apparent in the work of Ron Haviv, who saw the terrible conditions that hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians in the former Yugoslavia endured. He chose to stay in the area despite receiving littler media coverage of his photos. Now, more than 20 years later, some of his photos have been part of the effort to punish Serbian war criminals. Probably the most prominent example of this type of thinking is Marcus Bleasdale, who corrects people when they refer to him as a photojournalist. Rather, he sees himself as an activist, and uses photos to spread his message against conflict minerals in the Congo. He sends his photos to politicians as a way to pressure them into changing policy, and has over time seen good progress.

In the end, this idea is wrapped up in what seems to be one of, if not the, central debate of photojournalism: what is more important, art or content? Are the Magnum and VII photographers artists, journalists who tell visual stories, or something deeper and more humanitarian—something more Bleasdale-esque? Do the photos matter for their own value, or for what they can do? The answer seems to be slightly different for all journalist/documentary photographers.

Observations on Interconnections

A work of art, journalism, literature cannot exist without the presence of a viewer. Much of this entire course has been about being the viewer, bringing how we feel and what we know to a photograph, a representation of a single moment in time. A photograph is not the equivalent of truth; a photograph is also a form of portrayal and manifestation of someone’s perception of reality.

In other words, the topics we have discussed throughout this semester seem to be joined by a common thread, an idea iterated by Susan Sontag: a picture is not worth a thousand words. Without context and explanation, a photo can be interpreted to mean anything.

I remember a comment by Ben, while we were examining photos from (I believe) Telex Iran, in which he questioned whether we were perhaps trying a little too hard to find symbolic meaning in these photos. He rightfully shed light on the blurred line between deriving meaning and validating our own interpretations. When do our own opinions become too much? How far should we go in reach for the context of the situation? Where is the line between photography as an art form and photography as documentary evidence? Are documentary photographers not supposed express themselves in their documentations of truth and history?

While I may not have the answers to those questions, I hold onto the lens of Susan Sontag, the mysterious, ambiguous multidisciplinary power of photography. In the questions above, if we seek simple answers, then we underestimate, demarcate the breadth of photography and what we can do. If we draw lines and form cookie-cutter dimensions to the multiple facets of photography, we will only limit its capabilities and potentials to take on different forms–as art, as documentation, as fashion, as entertainment, etc.

9/11 Memorial

man with bookbag taking selfie woman reading plaque

building behind fountain

family taking photo in front of memorial

two people sitting in park

two people sitting in park with trees in front of them

man holding child in front of memorial

inside of memorial fountain

woman in front of memorial fountain

The inspiration for this project largely comes out of another project I did last year while studying abroad in Berlin, Germany. While there, I became fascinated by how history manifests itself in the public space of the city. What really caught my attention in particular, was the Holocaust Memorial. As a Jewish American, I was initially annoyed by the way many people interacted with the space. The memorial itself is meant to be interactive. Designed by Peter Eisenman, the memorial is made of 2,7000 concrete slabs that only differ in height. They are arranged in a grid, and people are able to walk through the grid any way they want experiencing “the wave like form differently from each different position.” I kept on wondering if is supposed to be interactive, what happens if people interact with the place in the “wrong” way? Can there be rules for a public space, even if it is a place meant for mourning or remembrance?

As this semester progressed, I began thinking more about how these themes relate to the 9/11 Memorial in New York. More so than the Holocaust Memorial, the 9/11 Memorial has much more personal significance to me. I was seven years old on September 1, 2001, living about 30 miles north of New York City. The day itself is one of my earliest memories. The teachers in my elementary school were not allowed to tell us what was going on, and as the morning went on, more and more parents arrived at the school to get there kids. I remember when my babysitter finally arrived, my brother, sister and I were confused because we weren’t allowed to get ice cream from the truck we usually got it from after school. When we arrived at home, footage of the attacks were playing on the TV in our living room. My brother and his friend who came over said something along the lines of “woah cool,” thinking the footage was from a movie, at which point, my mom informed us that the attacks were real. My only other memory of that day is trying to go into my parents room where my dad was after getting home from his office a block away from the World Trade Center. The door was locked and my mom told me I couldn’t go in for a little while. I think I remember that day less because I was afraid, but because all of the adults in my life were acting in a way that I was too young to understand.

Like much of my generation, I grew up in a world that was completely changed by 9/11, and the War on Terror that fallowed. Maybe if I was 10 years older, it would be easier for me to grasp how the world has changed because of the attacks. In This Muslim American Life,  Moustafa Bayoumi describes a “War on Terror culture”. He writes, “War on Terror culture means that the 9/11 Memorial, supposedly dedicated to ending intolerance and ignorance, offers pamphlets in nine languages but bizarrely not Arabic, and the 9/11 tour concludes with a film considered by many to be inflammatory toward Islam” (13) The film Bayoumi describes is called The Rise of Al Qaeda, and before the museum opened, the film was shown to a group of interfaith clergy. The only imam in the group, said of the film, “Unsophisticated visitors who do not understand the difference between Al Qaeda and Muslims may come away with a prejudiced view of Islam, leading to antagonism and even confrontation toward Muslim believers near the site.”, while the museum defends the film, saying it was created with the advisement of experts on Islam and terrorism (NY Times). Like most memorials, the 9/11 memorial is not a place without politics, and I was interested in how the politics of the memorial affect the way people interact with space, if it did have any effect at all.

Another interesting perspective on the 9/11 memorial comes from Marita Sturken, in her book Tourists of History: Memory, Kitsch and Consumerism from Oklahoma City to Ground Zero. According to Sturken, the 9/11 memorial has become a place of sentiment and kitsch. The kitsch she describes is not something shown in the design of the memorial itself, but rather, in the souvenirs you can buy at the memorial or the nearby museum shop. She writes, “A kitsch image or object not only embodies a particular kind of prepackaged sentiment, but conveys the message that this sentiment is universally shared, that it is appropriate, and importantly, that it is enough. When this takes place in the context of politically charged sites of violence, the effect is inevitably one that reduces political complexity to simplified notions of tragedy.” (26) She believes that the 9/11 memorial (and its entire complex, including the Freedom Tower)  is less about a place of redemption, and more one of mourning and patriotism. This is a problem, because it portrays the acts in a watered down way.

Before taking photos at the memorial, I decided to see how Magnum and VII members photographed the site. One photo by Susan Meiseles, shows a group of businessmen and women observing a moment of silence at the memorial on September 11, 2015. They are all wearing varying shades of gray suits with the hands folded in front of them. Another photo by Ron Haviv shows a Pennsylvania State Constable saluting an American flag on the 10th anniversary of the attacks with a cigar hanging from his mouth. A third by Eli Reed shows people watching the memorial ceremony on the one year anniversary of the attacks. Many people are holding American flags and have camera straps hanging from their necks. The last photo reminded me of one of the installations at the recent Laura Poitras exhibit at The Whitney Museum, which shows people watching ground zero the day after the attacks in slow motion. These three photos, in varying ways show patriotism and sorrow. They also reverse the gaze of the normal way we see ground zero, and the memorial built in its place in images. Instead of looking at the memorial itself, we are looking at people looking at the memorial.  However, I was interested in how people would act at the memorial on every other day. My photos show people at the 9/11 memorial on April 28, 2016.

 

Works Cited

 

  1. Bayoumi, Moustafa. This Muslim American Life: Dispatches from the War on Terror. New York: New York UP, 2015. Print.
  2. Haviv, Ron. Manny Rodrigeuz, a Pennsylvania State Constable, Salutes an American Flag during Events Commemorating the 10th Anniversary of the Sept. 11 Attacks in New York, N.Y., Sept. 11, 2011.
  3. Meiselas, Susan. USA. NYC. September 11, 2015. Observing a Moment of Silence outside the 9/11 Memorial and Museum in Observance of the Beginning of the September 11th Attacks. 2015.
  4. Otterman, Sharon. “Film at 9/11 Museum Sets Off Clash Over Reference to Islam.” The New York Times. The New York Times, 23 Apr. 2014. Web. 05 May 2016.
  5. Reed, Eli. USA. NYC. September 11, 2002. Spectators across from Ground Zero Attend the World Trade Center Memorial Ceremony.
  6. “Stiftung Denkmal Für Die Ermordeten Juden Europas: Field of Stelae.” Stiftung Denkmal Für Die Ermordeten Juden Europas: Field of Stelae. Web. 05 May 2016. <http://www.stiftung-denkmal.de/en/memorials/the-memorial-to-the-murdered-jews-of-europe/field-of-stelae.html>.
  7. Sturken, Marita. Tourists of History: Memory, Kitsch, and Consumerism from Oklahoma City to Ground Zero. Durham: Duke UP, 2007.  Print.
« Older posts Newer posts »