In the second and third week I did not participate/join the meetings due to midterms and multiple other assignments. However, I did continue to browse amongst different research paper on whether or not music is able to serve as something that can “reprogram” neurons within a human brain.

Throughout week 2, I looked through multiple research papers regarding music as a neuroagent, these included:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5984303/

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2996135/

However, I discovered that over time, brain plasticity worsens, and musics doesn’t really have any major effects on a grown adult’s brain, relative to a younger more underdeveloped brain of a toddler. 

Eventually, as I dug deeper into the topic of neurogenesis and neuroscience, I was met again with the topic of how seasonal songbirds are able to increase neurogenesis within their brains. These research papers can be found in the references and literature insight tabs. 

However, I was met with a dead end, considering there were no research papers to be found that related these songbirds’ brains to human ones, and moreover, there were no evidence supporting that music could be used to “actually” reprogram the human brain. Maybe its the fact that modern technology hasn’t reached a certain milestone yet, a milestone in which we would be able to produce music both pleasing to the ear and the brain. 

In the next meeting, I plan to change my direction to more concrete and in-person activities and look into joining a group that is currently working on a project that I could share with. However, I still plan to continue browsing the internet and research blog sites on when “music technology” is able to make changes to our brain, improving healthcare.