Fred Ott Sneezes, 130th anniversary

Fred Ott Sneezes, 130th anniversary

January 7, 2024: Happy 130th Fred Ott Day. 


January 7 because W. K. L. Dickson registered the title for copyright as Edison Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze, January 7th, 1894.

Below is an abbreviated version of last year’s post (“Fred Ott Sneezes, Twice”), which celebrated the 2023 web debut of the full-length Sneeze movie. 


Happy January 7th!  Two thousand twenty-three begins with a film premiere of sorts for Edison Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze, January 7th, 1894.

The day is an anniversary for the milestone of cinema commonly known as Fred Ott’s Sneeze. In 1894, Thomas Edison instructed W. K. L. Dickson to make a demonstration recording of their new Kinetoscope and to send a photographic illustration to Harper’s Weekly, which had requested a sneeze. 

Here is the web debut of the Library of Congress restoration, which begins with the familiar footage (first reanimated in 1953) and ends with the additional frames published in Harper’s, March 24, 1894. It’s one continuous take — in which Fred Ott sneezes twice!  

The image quality between that taken from the 45 frames in the copyright photograph and the additional 36 frames in Harper’s half-tone print is of course striking.

Here’s the same, repeated ten times, as seen in LOC’s 35mm film print, created in 2013. 

For the completists and projectionists, here’s same with 40 seconds of roll-in, countdown leader, animated LOC Packard Campus logo, and head title card before the original footage begins. 

 

 



Below is an excerpt from my earlier post
(“A New Look at an Old Sneeze,”) documenting the media archaeology of The Sneeze and its varying appearances, culminating in 2013-14. 

As part of this website’s annotated filmography of all works shown at the 2014 Orphan Film Symposium, the descriptions below are for items shown as part of this presentation: 

Dan Streible, “A New Look at an Old Sneeze: Edison Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze,” 9th Orphan Film Symposium, Obsolescence, Eye Filmmuseum, Amsterdam, Mar. 31, 2014. Includes live accompaniment by Stephen Horne. 27 min. Audio here. 

Recorded in January 1894, Fred Ott’s Sneeze (as it came to be known) was not seen as a moving image until reanimated from still photographs to 16mm film in 1953. The many film histories written before and after that year mistakenly refer to The Sneeze as a motion picture that circulated publicly, first on Edison kinetoscope viewers. All instances of The Sneeze on film, video, DVD, television, or the internet are derived from this 16mm copy, itself made from only one of two composite photographs on deposit at the Library of Congress (via. the U.S. Copyright Office) since January 9, 1894. Kemp R. Niver and his small company in Los Angeles did the preservation work for the LOC Paper Print Film Collection, in partnership with the Academy of Motion Pictures Arts and Sciences. The copyrighted work from W. K. L. Dickson showed 45 frames on paper, printed from the original 35mm Edison film. 

When I read the March 24, 1894 publication of Edison Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze in Harper’s magazine, I saw it consisted of 81 frames (a 9 x 9 grid). After research documented that no reanimated copies used all of the available frames, I asked the Library of Congress (National Audio-Visual Conservation Center) about this in 2013. Straight away, the Moving Image Section team had the Harper’s piece (81 frames on 1894 paper) and the copyright deposit card (45 frames) sent to the lab in Culpeper, Virginia. By September, LOC produced a bright, sharp new 35mm print that married the two sources into a longer version of Fred Ott’s Sneeze. A version never before seen as a moving image. 

For the premiere screening of this 35mm restoration, Mike Mashon of the Library of Congress and I presented it at the Indiana University Cinema for the film symposium entitled Orphans Midwest: Materiality and the Moving Image, September 27, 2013. [Audio here: Dan Streible, “Versions of ‘Films’: Kinetoscopic and Digital.” 14 min.]

Next, Eye Netherlands Filmmuseum projected Fred’s re-premiere on 35mm for my presentation “A New Look at an Old Sneeze: Edison Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze,” March 31, 2014. (The title itself alludes to a 1961 essay by historian Gordon Hendricks, “A New Look at an ‘Old Sneeze,’” Film Culture 22/23.) Worth noting for this study of how iterations and editions of works get reproduced in multiple forms: LOC’s 35mm print of the full-length Sneeze that debuted at Indiana University in 2013 was not locatable when Eye requested shipment to Amsterdam for Orphans 9.  Therefore the print projected at Eye was the Library’s second new 35mm print struck from the 2013 preservation negative. 

(1) Edison Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze, Jan. 7, 1894  (W. K. L. Dickson, US, 1894) 13 sec. .MOV file, sound, b&w. Source: Library of Congress YouTube channel, Mar. 26, 2009.   

Video also here: www.loc.gov/item/00694192/.


(2)  Edison Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze, January 7, 1894 (W. K. L. Dickson, US, 1894) 5 sec. Alternate titles: Fred Ott’s Sneeze; Ott’s Sneeze; The Sneeze, short version (ca. 1955): derived from 45 still images from one of the two copyright deposit cards. 35mm print, silent, b&w, 4 ft. (transfer speed at 16fps). Camera: William Heise. Performer: Fred Ott.
Source: Library of Congress, FEC 8091 (AFI/Gordon Hendricks Collection), 1994. 

sneeze oririnal
One of two copies Dickson deposited for copyright in 1894. The LOC catalog entry from the Prints and Photographs Division assigns the titleEdison kinetoscopic record of a sneeze / taken & copyrighted by W.K.-L. Dickson, Orange, N.J., digital file from original photo.” The catalog describes the original object as a “gelatin printing-out paper print.” Call numbers: PH – Dickson (W.), no. 2 (AA size) [P&P] PH – Dickson (W.), no. 1. Registration number: 44732Y U.S. Copyright Office. The number 4861 (lower right) was assigned to the digital object “LC-USZC4-4861 (color film copy transparency of no. 2).” Digital file from original photo http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/ppmsca.13462/.

3) Edison Kinetoscopic Record of a Sneeze, January 7, 1894 (W. K. L. Dickson, US, 1894) 3 min. longer version (2013); 35mm print created using 81 still images (45 from the copyright deposit card and 36 additional half-tone images published in Harper’s Weekly, March 24, 1894). This version shows Fred Ott sneezing twice, in one continuous take. This double-sneeze take is printed ten times on the 2013 film print. 35mm, silent, b&w. If run at 24 frame per second, the duration of each take is little more than 5 seconds. The 2013 digital intermediate, made before output to 35mm motion-picture film negative and positive print, retained the amber color of the original copyright deposit cards. But the LOC preservation lab only processes black-and-white film. 
Source: Library of Congress.

sneeze frames 81
Overlay of 45 amber frames from copyright deposit photograph on the 81 frames published in 1894.

 

Bonus track: George Willeman put a jaunty organ soundtrack to David Shepard’s silent parody film of 1971: “Jolly Coppersmith” and “Butcher Boy,” from the LP recording Al Melgard at the Chicago Stadium Organ: World’s Largest Theatre Pipe Organ (Audio-Fidelity, US, 1958?). Hence, a new edition on his personal YouTube channel (@nitratefury):

Raymond Rohauer presents “The Sneeze” (Geo. Willeman, Aug. 10, 2011). 

Here Mr. Ott holds his handkerchief in his left hand. In the original and its other descendants it’s in his right. Was Shepard having fun with this “error”? Not unlikely.   


____________
Thanks
of course to Library of Congress informants who made all of this possible: Paul Spehr (retired acting Chief of the Motion Picture and Recorded Sound Division), Pat Sheehan (emeritus), Mike Mashon (Head, Moving Image Section), Ken Weissman (Supervisor, Film Preservation Laboratory), George Willeman (Nitrate Vault Manager), cataloger Andrea Leigh (Head, Moving Image Processing Unit), paper print specialist Alexis Ainsworth (Processing Technician), and reference librarian Zoran Sinobad (Moving Image Research Center). And Charles Musser for his multiple invaluable publications and consultations about the Edison films.