Reading Response to《The Uncertainty of Documentarism》

Q1：

• Steyerl talks about how the “unbroken belief” of the documentary form is challenged. What does Steyerl mean by this? Certain movies and films are based on a true story.  How does truth inform fiction? How might fiction inform the truth?

Steyerl discusses the traditional concept of documentaries, which were once seen as direct presentations of reality but are now challenged. The term “unbroken belief” refers to the total acceptance of all documentary films without doubting their authenticity. Steyerl believes that in the contemporary era, the certainty of the real value of documentary images has been disrupted. The reason for this confusion is that the documentary form is gradually becoming blurred and abstract, incorporating many personal emotions from the creators during the production process. These forms lack clarity, often causing viewers to doubt the reality they depict. The “unquestionable belief” in the reality and objectivity of documentary images is no longer solid, as these images are more about stimulating emotions, sensations and a sense of “being there” rather than providing clear, objective depictions of reality.

Regarding the impact of authenticity on fictional works and vice versa, the relationship between the two can be quite complicated. They are in a complementary state, with no absolute fiction and, of course, no absolute reality. Whether it is a film or a documentary, it is the combination of fiction and reality that achieves the respective effects.

Q2：

• What is the significance of the authenticity and representation of the truth in the media that you consume on a daily basis? What is the role of a live broadcast?

The importance of authenticity and presentation in everyday media consumption is paramount, as it shapes the public’s perceptions, points of view, and attitudes. Audiences generally expect the media to provide truthful, accurate, and objective information. However, Steyerl’s discussion highlights the challenges of the contemporary media landscape, especially with the prevalence of live streaming and instant news dissemination, these things may not be as real as we imagine.

Live broadcasts are often thought to capture events in real time, providing immediacy and a “on the scene” feeling. However, as Steyerl points out, these broadcasts may focus more on generating emotional impact or intense sensations, rather than providing a clear, objective presentation of events. Given technological capabilities, it is very possible that these broadcasts also have a fictitious side.

Finally, regarding the role of live broadcasting, it should be a media platform with a considerable degree of authenticity to connect audiences. However, from the consumer’s perspective, one cannot fully trust live broadcasts, and should incorporate more media resources for consideration and integration, and make the final judgment.