• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Drilled Shaft Defects

Accuracy of Nondestructive Test Methods (NDT/NDE) in Detection of Construction Defects in Drilled Shafts

  • Home
  • Project Description
    • Geotechnical Conditions
    • Construction
    • Defects
    • NDT Methods Employed
    • Instrumentation
  • NDT Results
  • Load Tests
  • Media
    • Publications
    • Photos
    • Presentations
  • MORE
    • Prof. M. Iskander’s Web
    • Transparent Soil Wiki
    • SEP Calculator
    • Plastic Piling Wiki
    • MagicGeo Software
    • DTRA
    • RFERS
    • K-12
    • Rapid Penetration Into Soils
    • Drilled Shaft Defects
    • AI Geo
  • About us
  • Contact us

Load Tests

Load tests were performed in general accordance with American Society for Testing and Materials ASTM D1143 Test Method for Piles Under Axial Compressive Load ASTM . All tests were performed late at night or early morning to minimize thermal effects. Load was applied using a 300 ton hydraulic ram acting against a reaction beam, which was anchored to each of the reaction shafts using Dywidag bars.

The quick load test method was used. All load tests were carried to plunging failure. Load was applied in 10 kip increments, up to a deformation approximately equal to 10% of the shaft diameter (3.6 in). Each increment was maintained for 150 s. The hydraulic ram was equipped with a manually controlled electric pump, which allowed for application of a constant load, even during plunging failure. Test Shaft 4 was retested approximately 8 h after the initial compression test.

Load was measured using two load cells, and shaft-head displacement was recorded using three LVDTs. Data was recorded at a 10 Hz frequency and the average was stored once every 10 s. The LVDTs were connected to a stationary reference beam.

Test Shafts 2 and 4 were provided with ten sister bars measuring the strain at 10 ft intervals, with two sister bars at each depth. Sister bars consisted of full-arm strain gage bridge circuit, mounted on a rebar rod, with full development length on each side of the strain gages.

Summary of Load Test Results

Effect on Skin Friction

  • Skin friction dominated capacity
  • Defects appear to have a small effect on capacity, but further research is needed.
  • Reloading resulted in 30% reduction in capacity, possibly due to (1) Breakage of Cementation (2) Remolding of Clay, or (3) Structural Defects.

Effects on End Bearing

  • Soft bottom resulted in 33% reduction in capacity relative to undisturbed soil
  • Reloading resulted in 20% reduction in capacity relative to undisturbed soil

Load Test- Shaft 2

Load TestsLoad Test- Shaft 4

 

Load Test

Load Test- Shaft 4-Reload

 

Load Test

Primary Reference

  • Iskander, M., Roy, D., Kelley, S., and Ealy, C. (2003). ”Drilled Shaft Defects: Detection, and Effects on Capacity in Varved Clay.” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineeering, 129(12), 1128–1137 [link]

Footer

Copyright © 2016 - Drilled Shaft Defects - All Rights Reserved

click for NYU CUE

Copyright © 2026 · News Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in