Min-Wei Lee
Transient Workers Count Too (TWC2)
Singapore
On the second day of my internship with TWC2, I met Juvy, a 32-year-old runaway Filipina domestic worker. Thankfully the case, which had to do with salary issues, was more or less settled on the day itself, but unfortunately for Juvy she was unable to receive consent for a transfer of employer and had to return home the next day.
That Wednesday was long and tiring as I went between the Ministry of Manpower, the shelter, and Juvy’s employer’s house to retrieve her personal belongings, but meeting her and being able to bring her some measure of comfort made it worthwhile. Though outwardly unassuming and soft-spoken, the woman I came to know over the course of one of the most trying days of her life was brave, resourceful, and exceedingly compassionate, even towards the employer who had caused her so much grief.
Browsing through the photographs I have taken of workers over the course of my internship, I am extremely humbled by the people I’ve met and ashamed at my younger self, who wholeheartedly subscribed to Singapore’s brutally unforgiving and extensively systemic elitist mentality. As I familiarize myself with more cases, it becomes clear, especially in the case of domestic workers, that one of the key factors in exploitation is the employers’ limited one-dimensional perspective regarding foreign workers.
Singapore’s inflexible and deeply ingrained mantra of meritocracy and competitiveness has produced a society that defines success and worth with very select criteria. The dignity of labor seems not to extend to the lower classes of its stratified society, which categorizes lowly paid foreign labor as the ignored and rejected “other.” Perhaps this is the reason that a widely perpetuated elitist mindset, coupled with the country’s loophole-ridden foreign worker legislation, normalizes the notion that these workers are not entitled to the same basic labor rights afforded to local employees.
While on the topic of local mindsets, another troubling phenomenon I’ve discovered is the dogged inflexibility of Singaporean administrators. Having gone through Singapore’s education system, I am fully aware that Singapore believes that everything has a “right” answer, while any deviation from the prescribed and approved is unacceptable. Such rote learning, while successful in producing high-scoring students and compliant citizens, does little to develop the problem-solving skills of employees. Empathetic responses seem to always be buried by apathetic clinical directions.
While accompanying a worker to his employer’s office to retrieve his owed salary and illegal savings, my colleague and I were not allowed to step into the office where the discussion would be held, even though the worker had a limited grasp of English and might not have been able to comprehend the details of the discussion. After three and a half hours of waiting at a separate reception area, no settlement was reached because the company insisted on cutting the amount owed (SGD $600 [USD $444]) in half and agreed to pay the amended sum only if the worker signed some legal documents that he did not fully understand. Also, when we tried to leave the waiting area to find out what had happened to the worker, the receptionist immediately prevented us from doing so, claiming that she had “not received further instructions” regarding our stay in the office. Though initially shocked by my experiences on the receiving end of such mindless bureaucracy, I can only imagine how difficult it is to navigate such an impenetrable system of operations as a foreigner new to Singapore.